Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,631–6,847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 02:09
6,656
-7
1 Nov 2026, 06:17
6,663
-6
29 Oct 2026, 12:16
6,669
+7
26 Oct 2026, 15:39
6,662
+6
23 Oct 2026, 09:35
6,656
-2
20 Oct 2026, 11:19
6,658
-12
17 Oct 2026, 15:59
6,670
-6
14 Oct 2026, 16:40
6,676
-8
11 Oct 2026, 02:55
6,684
-20
5 Oct 2026, 00:21
6,704
+8
26 Sept 2026, 02:17
6,696
-17
17 Sept 2026, 09:39
6,713
-10
13 Sept 2026, 19:58
6,723
-16
10 Sept 2026, 05:19
6,739
-15
4 Sept 2026, 18:57
6,754
-5
1 Sept 2026, 12:08
6,759
-7
29 Aug 2026, 03:18
6,766
-3
26 Aug 2026, 01:22
6,769
-13
22 Aug 2026, 14:55
6,782
-22
18 Aug 2026, 20:53
6,804
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 6,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
806
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
48 (13 June 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
4,028
Reactions total
74
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 01:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 13s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
560 reactions across 46 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
430
76.8%
👍
47
8.39%
😁
36
6.43%
🤣
17
3.04%
💔
7
1.25%
😢
7
1.25%
🍓
4
0.714%
👏
3
0.536%
🥰
3
0.536%
💯
2
0.357%
😭
2
0.357%
🤨
2
0.357%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 560 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نبدأ من جديد.. وتستمر رحلة فقه المال
🤎إلى طلابنا ومتابعينا الكرام..
❕ منذ أيام فقدنا قناتنا السابقة على يوتيوب، بما ضمّته
من محاضرات ولقاءات علمية، وآلاف المشتركين الذين رافقونا
في رحلة نشر الوعي بالمعاملات المالية وأحكامها الشرعية.
🚀 ولم يكن فقدان هذا الجهد أمرًا يسيرًا، لكن بفضل الله
لم تتوقف مسيرتنا.
⏳ فقد بدأنا في استعادة ما أمكن من المحتوى العلمي،
وإعادة نشره تدريجيًا، إلى جانب استعدادنا لتقديم المزيد
من …
"الأفعال التي يمكن دخولها تحت الأمر والنهي لا تكون مستوية من كل وجه
بل إن فعلت على الوجه المحبوب.. كان وجودها خيرا للعبد،
وإلا.. كان تركها خيرا له وإن لم يعاقب عليها.
ففضول المباح التي لا تعين على الطاعة:
عدمُها خيرٌ من وجودها إذا كان مع عدمها يشتغل بطاعة الله؛ فإنها تكون شاغلة له عن ذلك،
وأما إذا قُدِّر أنها تشغله عما دونها.. فهي خير له مما دونها،
وإن شغلته عن معصية الله.. كانت رحمة في حقه،
وإن كان اشتغاله بطا…
موعــــــــدنا اليـــــــوم مع اللقاء التفاعلي الخامس والأربعين (المحاضرة 02 من سلسلة الروض المربع)
يقدمـــــــها الدكتـــور: أحمد ياسين
⏱الساعــــــــــــــة: 10:00 مساءً بتوقيت مكة
مفاجآت خاصة لحاضري اللقاءات التفاعلية:
▫️الحصول على مقعد مجاني في دبلوم فقه ومحاسبة زكاة الشركات عند حضور 40 لقاء.
▫️الحصول على مقعد مجاني في برنامج التأهيل لشهادة المصرفي الإسلامي المعتمد عند حضور 35 لقاء.
▫️الحصول على مقعد في برنا…
○○ كيف يُسرق منا العمر حتی صرنا أسری للإعجابات، والإشعارات، والمشاركات؟
○○ كيف صار الكتاب ثقيلًا علی النفس والعقل؟ وصارت المعاني الثقيلة غريبة تتجافی عنها النفس؟
○○ ماذا لو كان هذا الأسير مؤثرًا في غيره!
وماذا لو كان ممن يدعو الناس إلی الخير؟
كيف تُغيره وسائل التواصل وخوارزمياتها؟
○○ إذًا، هل يتركها؟
أم يدافعها ويُزاحمها؟
🎙مع درس تربوي جديد:
أثر وسائل التواصل علی الدعوة والدعاة | د. أحمد عبد المنعم
يوتيوب | ساوندك…
🎥 اليوم | اللقاء الختامي للمستوى التأسيسي من صناعة الحلال 🌿
⏳ بعد رحلة علمية امتدت لسبعة أسابيع، انتقلنا خلالها من فقه البيوع وأصول المعاملات المالية المحرمة إلى التطبيقات المصرفية والأسواق المالية، وفقه الزكاة، والقواعد والضوابط الجامعة...
🎯 نصل اليوم إلى اللقاء التفاعلي السابع والختامي من برنامج
«صناعة الحلال – المستوى التأسيسي».
📖 أسئلة وأجوبة حول نوازل المعاملات المالية المعاصرة
🎓 مع د. مصطفى رفعت
متخصص في ال…
📘 خصائص النسخة التفاعلية للكتاب
نسخة إلكترونية مطوَّرة تجعل التعامل مع الكتاب أقرب إلى قاعدة للبحث والدراسة، وليس مجرد ملف للقراءة، ومن أبرز خصائصها:
🔎 بحث شامل داخل محتوى الكتاب.
🔢 الانتقال المباشر إلى أي معيار أو بند بمجرد إدخال رقمه.
🔗 إحالات مترابطة تفاعليًا؛ بالنقر على رقم البند تنتقل مباشرة إلى موضعه.
↩️ الرجوع إلى موضع القراءة السابق بسهولة بعد تتبع الإحالات.
📖 مقارنة النص بأصله المطبوع (PDF)، مع إمكانية فتح ا…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @AhmadYasseen1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @AhmadYasseen1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قناة شريف علي @Sherif_Aly · 88,767 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
المُشوِّق إلى القُرآن | عمرو الشرقاوي @Aalsharqawy · 31,575 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
قناة أمجد سمير @amgadsamir · 251,191 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
قناة كريم حلمي @kareemahelmy · 37,872 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
صوتيات قناة أمجد سمير @amgad_samir_sounds · 53,039 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
قناة: خالد بهاء الدين @Kbahaa · 23,576 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
فاتحون🔻 @fathoon · 25,803 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
صوتيات مجالس شريف علي @SawtiatSherifAli · 19,396 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
د.أحمد العربي - القناة الرسمية @Ahmed_Elaraby · 178,640 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
هذه سبيلي | القناةالدعوية لأسماءمحمدلبيب @hatheehi_sabili_asmaa · 28,490 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
تسجيلات دروس رِفقة || @rifqahrecordings · 28,342 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
دروس كاست @DroosCast · 92,152 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
قناة أحمد عبد المنعم @ahmad_abdelmon3em · 145,631 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
مسجد أحمد أبو أحمد @MsjdAboAhmed · 227,516 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
إنه القرآن ( القناة الرسمية ) @itsTheQuraan · 277,520 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
رِفقة- RIFQAH @RifqahOnline · 38,534 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
القناة الرسمية للشيخ هاني حلمي @hanyhilmy · 23,517 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
واحة القرآن عادل الجندي @wahaQuR · 33,034 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
درجات @DarajatAhmedAmer · 59,499 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
صناعة حفّاظ القرآن - د.سعيد حمزة @saidhamza2023 · 33,446 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
شبكة الطريق إلى الله - Way2allah.com @way2allahcom · 32,688 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
المهندس علاء حامد Alaa Hamed @Alaa_Hamed1 · 165,811 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
فِطرَة @fetra20 · 50,377 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Ahmed pharmacy (OTC) @OTCcourse · 63,127 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة : أحمد ياسين” (@AhmadYasseen1), 6,656 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AhmadYasseen1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.