Channel
@alkhalil_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,799subscribers
+736 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001276392112 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alkhalil_1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alkhalil_1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 34,799 | +113 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 34,686 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 34,657 | +18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 34,639 | +42 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 34,597 | +64 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 34,533 | +37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 34,496 | +22 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:43 | 34,474 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:04 | 34,460 | +21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 34,439 | +17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 34,422 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 34,411 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 34,419 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 34,413 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 34,407 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 34,393 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 34,394 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 34,384 | +8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 34,376 | +13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 34,363 | first reading |
95 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (21 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 196,960 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
«إني من أهل الجنة» قال مصعب بن سعد بن أبي وقاص : كان رأس أبي في حجري، وهو يقضي، فبكيت. فرفع رأسه إلي، فقال: أي بني! ما يبكيك؟ قلت: لمكانك، وما أرى بك. قال: «لا تبك، فإن الله لا يعذبني أبدا، وإني من أهل الجنة». قال الحافظ الذهبي: «صدق والله، فهنيئا له». قلت: سعد بن أبي وقاص (رضي الله عنه) من أهل الجنة قطعاً؛ لأنه شهد له بذلك النبي ﷺ فهو من العشرة المبشرين بالجنة. فهنيئا له ما أسعده. (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل ا…
«التفصيل في تقبيل اليد» 1- تقبيل اليد لم يكن الصحابة يعتادونَه إلا قليلًا، ولما قدِموا عليه عامَ مؤتةَ قبَّلوا يدَه، وقالوا: نحن الفَرَّارُونَ، قال: «بل أنتم العَكَّارونَ»، وقبَّل أبو عُبَيدةَ يدَ عمرَ. 2- وأرخص أكثرُ الفقهاءِ - أحمدُ وغيرُه - لمن فعَل ذلك على وجهِ التديُّنِ، لا على وجهِ التعظيمِ للدنيا، وكرِه ذلك آخرونَ؛ كمالكٍ وغيرِه، وقال سليمانُ بنُ حربٍ: (هي السجدةُ الصغرى). 3- وأما ابتداءُ مدِّ اليدِ للناسِ …
{فالصالحات قانتات حافظات للغيب} ما معنى: {قانتات}؟ الصالحةُ: هي التي تكونُ قانتةً؛ أي: مداومةً على طاعةِ زوجِها. قاله ابن عباس، وسفيان، وابن تيمية وغيرهم. (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل العلمية) (t.me/alkhalil_1)
Video, posted without a caption
«من دلائل النبوة» قال رسول اللهﷺ: «إذا وقع الذباب في شراب أحدكم فليغمسه ثم لينزعه؛فإن في أحد جناحيه داء،وفي الآخر شفاء» أخرجه البخاري كيف عرف النبي ﷺ أن في أحد جناحيه داء، وفي الآخر شفاء؟ مع أن هذا الأمر لم يكتشفه العلم الحديث إلا مؤخرا. هذا مما لا يمكن معرفته بوجه من الوجوه إلا بخبر من السماء. (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل العلمية) (t.me/alkhalil_1)
هل ينبغي في العقود التجارية بين الناس: أن يدقق في بيان الشروط والتفاصيل داخل العقد أو الأحسن الإجمال والتخفف ؟ الجواب: الأحسن أن يدقق في بيان الشروط والتفاصيل. والدليل على ذلك: أن كثيرا من أحكام الشرع جاءت لدفع النزاع والاختلاف ولهذا شرعت الشهادة والشفعة ومنع من البيع على البيع أخيه ومنع من تلقي الركبان في أحكام كثيرة شرعت لدفع النزاع والاختلاف. والتفصيل في العقود أبعد لوقوع الاختلاف والنزاع كما لا يخفى. (قناة …
Photo, posted without a caption
«الْمَبَادِئُ لَا تَتَجَزَّأُ» إذا رأيت الرجل خَلُوقًا مُؤَدَّبًا مع أهله دون باقي أقاربه فضلا عن باقي الناس فهذا ليس خلوقا بل مُتَعَصِّبٌ. وإذا رأيت الرجل خَلُوقًا مُؤَدَّبًا مع الأغنياء وأصحاب المناصب دون غيرهم. فهذا ليس خلوقا بل صاحب مصلحة.. وهكذا ... فالمؤدب أَدَبًا حقيقيًّا لا يَتَلَوَّنُ. (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل العلمية) (t.me/alkhalil_1)
لماذا جاء في الآية: «واشتعل الرأس شيبًا». يعني لماذا لم تكن الآية: (واشتعل شيب الرأس) ؟ الجواب: لأنه يستفاد من الصيغة القرآنية عموم الشيب لجميع الرأس. ولو كانت الآية (واشتعل شيب الرأس) لم يفد ذلك العموم. ومثال ذلك: أنك لو قلت في مثاله اشتعلت النار في البيت: لصدق هذا القول على اشتعال النار في جانب واحد من البيت دون بقية جوانبه. وإذا قلت: اشتعل البيت نارًا أفاد هذا القول أن النار قد شملت جميع نواحي البيت. (قنا…
Video, posted without a caption
هل باقي كثير على قيام الساعة ؟ {وما يدريك لعل الساعة تكون قريبا} هذه الآية المراد بها التخويف من قرب الساعة. فيستعد لها المسلم بالعمل الصالح. (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل العلمية) (t.me/alkhalil_1)
من الحكمة معرفة أن: لكل مقام مقال. قال إبراهيم النخعي: «كان أصحاب رسول الله - ﷺ - يقرءون في السفر بالسور القصار» (قناة د. أحمد بن محمد الخليل العلمية) (t.me/alkhalil_1)
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @alkhalil_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alkhalil_1 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 152 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة د. أحمد الخليل 📚” (@alkhalil_1), 34,799 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alkhalil_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.