Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про арабский | اللغة العربية

Channel

Про арабский | اللغة العربية

@al_kalam2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,421subscribers

-210 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296508033
TypeChannel
Username@al_kalam2
DescriptionПроголосуй: https://t.me/boost/al_kalam2
Created14 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_kalam2

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,4218,6318,5266 August 2026 — 8,631 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,631 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,623 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,589 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,581 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,575 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,571 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,563 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,555 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,544 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,539 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,531 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,522 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,495 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,461 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,447 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,457 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,464 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,458 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,447 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,441 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,432 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,431 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,421 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,390–8,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 20:398,421-10
2 Nov 2026, 10:378,431-1
30 Oct 2026, 17:168,432-9
27 Oct 2026, 13:278,441-6
24 Oct 2026, 16:148,447-11
21 Oct 2026, 11:308,458-6
18 Oct 2026, 02:278,464+7
15 Oct 2026, 06:078,457+10
11 Oct 2026, 18:578,447-14
5 Oct 2026, 11:388,461-34
27 Sept 2026, 15:218,495-27
18 Sept 2026, 17:008,522-9
14 Sept 2026, 15:388,531-8
11 Sept 2026, 07:188,539-5
6 Sept 2026, 13:578,544-11
2 Sept 2026, 08:368,555-8
30 Aug 2026, 18:068,563-8
28 Aug 2026, 01:588,571-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:258,575-6
21 Aug 2026, 15:558,581first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 8,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held31 (5 January 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total10,504
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
188
Videos
44
Links
94

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42m 05s
Average length
10m 31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 31 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @al_kalam2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (55.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

28 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC405 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

Ибн Теймия, да помилует его Аллах, указал на ошибки Сибавейхи в 80 местах его книги «аль-Китаб». При этом Сибавейхи считается одним из имамов в науке ан-нахв. —————— Передаётся, что это произошло ещё до того, как Ибн Теймии исполнилось 20 лет. А сегодня в этом возрасте мало кто успевает пройти даже «аль-Аджрумию» — начальную книгу по ан-нахву. https://t.me/al_kalam2

17 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC817 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Последовательность изучения книг по науке нахв, предлагаемая шейхом Сулейманом аль-‘Уюни: 1) «Аль-Аджрумия» или «Ан-Нахв ас-Сагир», автор Сулейман аль-‘Уюни. 2) «Аль-Муватта филь ‘Ираб», автор Сулейман аль-‘Уюни. 3) «Катр ан-Нада», автор Ибн Хишам или «Аль-Азхария», автор Халида аль-Азхари. 4) «Альфия Ибн Малика». * У шейха есть уроки по всем этим книгам. #нахв t.me/al_kalam2

16 Oct 2026, 12:43 UTC732 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Шарх “Катр ан-Нада” шейха ‘АбдуЛлаха аль-Фаузана, который называется “Т’аджилю ан-Нада” — один из лучших современных шархов на данный матн»,— шейх Сулейман аль-‘Уюни. #нахв t.me/al_kalam2

16 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC699 viewsread 6 November 2026
File

Шарх «Катр ан-Нада» шейха ‘АбдуЛлаха аль-Фаузана. #книги t.me/al_kalam2

16 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC641 viewsread 6 November 2026

التوكل سلاح المؤمن Упование [на Аллаха] — оружие верующего. https://t.me/al_kalam2

14 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC720 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

Виды كان: ١) ناقصة неполный ٢) تامة полный ٣) زائدة добавочный t.me/al_kalam2

13 Oct 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,580 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Порой одно искреннее слово оказывает большее воздействие (влияние), чем тысяча поступков»,— шейх Салих ас-Сувеийх, да сохранит его Аллах. t.me/al_kalam2

13 Oct 2026, 06:17 UTC≈4,110 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Арабский язык — лучший из языков. Стремление изучить его относится к религии, ведь он служит средством приобретения знаний, ключом к пониманию религии и причиной благополучия в этой жизни и жизни будущей», — Абу Мансур ас-Са’алиби. فقه اللغة t.me/al_kalam2

11 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC800 viewsread 6 November 2026

الصعود للأعلى صعب. Подниматься вверх трудно. أما النزول للأسفل فهو يسير. А спускаться вниз легко. t.me/al_kalam2

4 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,040 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

هل تحزن من نجاح الآخرين ؟ صارح نفسك... إذا كنت كذلك فاعلم أن النبي ﷺ قال: «لا يؤمن أحدكم حتى يحب لأخيه ما يحب لنفسه» متفق عليه Огорчает ли тебя успех других? Будь честен с самим собой… Если это так, то знай, что Пророк ﷺ сказал: «Не уверует никто из вас до тех пор, пока не станет желать своему брату (в исламе) того же, чего желает самому себе». Написал: шейх Ахмад аль-Халиль. t.me/al_kalam2

4 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC955 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Если человек не кается в своих грехах, они накапливаются в сердце и порождают в нём черствость, а порой — ожесточение сердца и болезнь, а порой — и смерть»,— шейх Мухаммад аль-Ма‘юф, да сохранит его Аллах. t.me/al_kalam2

27 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 November 2026
File

Многие, кто начинает изучать арабский язык, быстро выгорают. Причина проста: месяцы уходят на сухую грамматику и таблицы, а долгожданное чувство, что ты напрямую понимаешь слова Пророка ﷺ, так и не приходит. Кажется, что до чтения первоисточников — бесконечный путь. Но есть другой подход! Представляем практическое учебное пособие: 📒 «Услада очей в хадисах из двух слов» («Куррату-ль-‘Айн фи Ахадис аль-Калиматайн») …

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @al_kalam2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @al_kalam2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Арабский | Arabic | العربية
@my_misr_arabic · 22,919
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
تجويد لمن تريد 📖
@Alltagweed · 113,912
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про арабский | اللغة العربية” (@al_kalam2), 8,421 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_kalam2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.