Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ندى عمر ~ قناة

Channel

ندى عمر ~ قناة

@nomar2019

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,832subscribers

+49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001369725523
TypeChannel
Username@nomar2019
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nomar2019

Growth

9,7539,8339,7936 August 2026 — 9,783 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,783 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,780 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,779 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,759 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,812 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,833 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,828 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,832 subscribers9,8326 August 20262 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,741–9,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 07:569,832+4
30 Aug 2026, 11:089,828-5
25 Aug 2026, 00:299,833+21
21 Aug 2026, 12:469,812+59
18 Aug 2026, 19:239,753-6
15 Aug 2026, 17:249,759-13
12 Aug 2026, 06:039,772-7
9 Aug 2026, 12:339,779-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:109,780-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:009,783no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:549,783first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.91%
avg views ÷ 9,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
974
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held93 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total76,002
Reactions total2,462
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,854 reactions across 90 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,47186.6%
😢1093.82%
👍963.36%
💔752.63%
💯371.30%
👏270.946%
🔥180.631%
😭110.385%
😍30.105%
🤩30.105%
😱20.07%
😁10.035%
🤔10.035%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC378 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

اسأل الله لأنه كريم سبحانه ويعطي..ليس لأنك تستحق أن يعطيك.. فنعمه ومنته عليك لا تحصيها ولا تحصي ثناء عليه سبحانه.. لكنه الرب الحي القيوم..وإنعامه عليك ورزقه لك واستجابته لدعائك جزء من ربوبيته..لا إله إلا هو المجيب القريب... اللهم صل على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم..

26

28 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC567 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026

بمناسبة الحديث حول العين والحسد.. لعل من يتابعني من فترة طويلة،، لاحظ أن أكثر من 90% من منشوراتي هي كتابات قديمة لي مكررة.. نعم أصبح لدي قصور شديد في الكتابة..ونادرا ما أستطيع تجميع أفكاري لأكتب.. بل وأكثر من ذلك، أنني في بداية بحث الدكتوراة بقيت أكثر من سنة ونصف لا أستطيع ان أكتب حرفا في الرسالة! قبل فترة اهتممت قليلا بالرقية الشرعية لأمور تتعبني،، فرأيت مناما واضحا أن لدي إصابة من حسد في الكتابة.. ولم أكن لأتحدث ع

23😢16💔8👍5

28 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC635 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

تذكير بمجلس الوابل الصيب اليوم إن شاء الله الساعة ٣ ظهرا بتوقيت مكة على روضة المؤمنات.. رابط البوت لمن أرادت التسجيل https://t.me/hesaann_bot حياكن الله..

5

27 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC990 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

كل أسبوع تقريبا أصبحنا نسمع عن زلزال في المشرق أو المغرب.. فيضانات طينية تدفن الناس وبيوتهم وهم أحياء! حرائق في الغابات كأنها الجحيم تستعر! صواعق ورعود تهز القلوب في كل مكان لا تملك إلا أن تغلق عينيك وتسد أذنيك خوفا ورهبة.. كسوف وخسوف هنا وهناك يختفي معها شعاع الشمس الحارق ونور القمر الوضيء! كل هذا ومازال الإنسان المتمرد.. الذي لا يملك نفَسًا من أنفاسه إذا دخل أن يخرج... الذي يقتله برغوث لا يُرى بالعين المجردة إن دخ

16😢4👏3💔2💯1

27 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC648 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

على مستوى العلاقات ... من يقول إنها لا تعود بعد جفاء..ويتحجج بتغير الخلاّن.. إنما تعود إلى الأفضل تلك العلاقات الناضجة التي لا يستغني فيها طرف عن الآخر.. ويحملان قلبا نقيّا لا يراكم المواقف..

19👍5😢2😁1

27 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC663 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

س: فعلت كل شئ جاهدت ع قراءة الورد كثيرا ولم انتظم جاهدت ع سماع مواعظ حضور دورات بحث عن صحبة قراءة بعض كتب أتابع بعض الحسابات المفيدة كل هذا لم يؤثر فيا أبدا تعبت عقلي كاد يطير لا أعلم أين المشكلة أين الخلل هل قلبي ميت هل يكرهني الله لماذا لا يرحمني مما أنا فيه ماذا أفعل بعد كل محاولاتي يأست والله غصب ج: يبدو أنك تفعلين كل هذا وأنت متحفزة تنتظرين النتيجة بضغطة زر.. وليس أمر القلب كذلك..وكلامك فيه تسخط يدل على خلل واضح

13👍1😢1

27 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC636 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026

كثير من المسلمين يقرؤون سورة الكهف كل جمعة، وتمر عليهم آيات السفينة التي خرقها الخضر والولد الذي قتله والجدار الذي بناه، وخفيت عن موسى -عليه السلام- أسبابها وظنّها شرا، وأرادها الله لحِكم جليلة.. لكن المفارقة أن كثيرا من الناس اليوم لديهم تسخط من الأقدار وعدم تصور أن وراء الأقدار حكم قد تخفى عليهم، وأن الإيمان بأن الله عليم حكيم لا يخلق شرا محضا من لوازمه التسليم له سبحانه في ما يقدّر وما يمنع وما يعطي! فيطمئن القلب

24

27 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC665 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026

من يفهم التوكل حقا...لا يُقصّر في الأسباب مطلقا، لكن الفرق أن قلبه معلق بالله اعتمادا واستعانة وأن هذه الأسباب لا تؤثر بذاتها.. وأن الله بيده نواصي العباد، وتدبير الأمور سبحانه.. وغيره معلق قلبه بالأسباب ذاتها.. لا يلجأ إلى ربه إلا عندما تُقصر معه تلك الأسباب.. خيط رفيع بين الأخذ بالأسباب كما أمر الشرع.. وبين التعلق بالأسباب حتى يصل العبد إلى الشرك! #التوكل #حسن_الظن_بالله

27👏1

26 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC618 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @neeaam2026

من أدعية السُّنةِ النبوية مساءً: (أمسيتُ أُثني عليكَ حمدًا، وأَشهد أن لا إله إلا الله)

26

26 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC734 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026

الباقيات الصالحات.. ----- كريم حلمي قل (سبحان الله)، ونزّه معها ربك عن ظن الظنون، وما يلقيه الشيطان في روعك من أحاديث السوء، نزهه عن كل خاطر خبيث ينزع عنه في نفسك عزّته أو رحمته أو حكمته! قل (الحمد لله)، وعظّم معها في نفسك كل نعمة قد أسبغها الله عليك، وكل خيرٍ قد أودعه فيك، وكل سوء قد صرفه عنك، وكل أمارة وُدٍّ قد أظهرها لك! قل (الله أكبر)، وصغّر معها في نفسك كل شيء من حطام الدنيا، من همّها وغمّها وبلائها وأهلها وزين

33🔥3👍1

26 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC822 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026

النضج النفسي أن تسمع كلاما عن نفسك قد يكون فيه عتاب أو انتقاد..بدون أن تهاجم القائل وتحول الموقف إلى عراك..أو تهاجم شخصه (قلب الطاولة عليه).. بل تحاول التفكير في كلامه قبل أن تدافع عن نفسك..وهذا يدل على قوة نفسية وثبات قد لا يكون له علاقة بالسن.. من علاماته أيضا الصدق مع النفس..والشجاعة في الاعتراف بالخطأ..والاعتذار الحقيقي..هذه شجاعة قد لا يمتكلها حتى من نرى شجاعتهم في النزال! لأن الشخص الذي لديه نضج نفسي معركته في

34🔥2😢2

25 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC749 views47 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @neeaam2026

أن يكون لك اليد العليا.. فأنت من تعطي وتتصدق ...وتعين وتساعد.. ان يكون لك من المال ما تحفظ به ماء وجهك.. ورزق تستغني به عن سؤال الناس.. أن تتعفف عن السؤال والمسألة.. تلك من أجل النعم التي تستوجب حمدا لله الرزاق ذي القوة المتين..

47

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @nomar2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,698 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قطوف - علّموا الناس الخير
@Qutooff · 104,402
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
فقه العلاقات
@fiqhal3laqat · 38,710
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
قناة تسنيم راجح
@TassneemRajehChannel · 41,928
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
بالوحي نُرَبِّي - سمر إبراهيم
@Belwhynoraby · 62,971
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
مسجد أحمد أبو أحمد
@MsjdAboAhmed · 229,438
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
ممّا قَرَأتُ : 📚
@readrr · 51,063
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
نافع | Nafe3
@Nafae3 · 106,266
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
ملف الزواج
@elzwag · 39,246
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
شكة دبوس - pinprick
@shaketdabooz · 445,115
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
فِطرَة
@fetra20 · 51,101
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
رَوْضَةُ الأَدَبِ
@Rawwda · 229,696
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
• حَرْفٌ | 🌸
@haref2 · 35,014
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
فِقْهُ الطَّبِيب"ما لا يسَعُ المسلم الطبيب جهله"
@fiqh_altabib · 96,017
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
دروس كاست
@DroosCast · 94,735
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
معهد المحطات السبع
@Hefzelquraanchangedme · 55,016
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ندى عمر ~ قناة” (@nomar2019), 9,832 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nomar2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.