Channel
@Drhabaloshi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,016subscribers
+165 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002203232765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Drhabaloshi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Drhabaloshi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 5,016 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 5,012 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 5,006 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 4,995 | +89 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 4,906 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 4,911 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 4,908 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 4,899 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,895 | +9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 4,886 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 4,874 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 4,863 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 4,851 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 4,851 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 99 | 95.2% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 4.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
كان بعض مشايخنا يكره وينهى عن كثرة التنظير فيما يدرس الطالب من كتب أو يحفظ.. إلخ وكان يقول: إذا رأيت الشخص يكثر من ذلك فاعلم أنه ليس بطالب علمٍ.. المقصود: إذا عرفت طريقة العلماء في طلب العلم فالزمها، ولا تكثر الالتفات إلى كثرة المنظرين؛ فإن ذلك سيقطعك عن مواصلة السير في طريق طلب العلم..
👍1
الإنسان في هذه الدنيا: يسير إلى ربه في كل يوم يصبح فيه ويمسي؛ ﴿ يَا أَيُّهَا الْإِنْسَانُ إِنَّكَ كَادِحٌ إِلَى رَبِّكَ كَدْحًا فَمُلَاقِيهِ ﴾ [الِانْشِقَاقِ: 6]. فالناس كلهم في سير مستمر، وليس فيهم واقف مستقر.. فمن الناس كادح في فعل الخير والطاعة؛ فمنتفع من كدحه، ومن الناس كادح في فعل الشر والمعصية؛ فمتضرر من كدحه.. ثم كلٌّ سيلقى ربه، وسيلقى جزاء عمله؛ من ثواب أو عقاب.. فاللهم إنا لنرجو لقائك، ونخشى عقابك..
👍2
مجلس سماع كتاب منهج السالكين وتوضيح الفقه في الدين الجمعة ٢٤ صفر ١٤٤٨ه - الجزء الثاني رابط اليوتيوب 👇🏻 https://youtu.be/VAbfKB5eZfE?si=U_Z_cYAwJMHrTxmd
👍1
التطويل في شرح المتون لمددٍ طويلة من أهم أسباب ضعف الملكة. وذلك بسبب انقطاع مسائل الفن بعضها من بعض... قال ابن خلدون في المقدمة: «وكذلك ينبغي لك -أي: للمعلم- : ألا تطول على المتعلم في الفن الواحد والكتاب الواحد، بتقطيع المجالس وتفريق ما بينها؛ لأنه ذريعة إلى النسيان وانقطاع مسائل الفن بعضها من بعض، فيعسر حصول الملكة بتفريقها. وإذا كانت أوائل العلم وأواخره حاضرة عند الفكرة مجانبة للنسيان؛ كانت الملكة أيسر حصولاً، و…
👍4
قال ابن خلدون في المقدمة: «وكذلك ينبغي لك -أي: المعلم- ألا تطول على المتعلم في الفن الواحد والكتاب الواحد، بتقطيع المجالس وتفريق ما بينها؛ لأنه ذريعة إلى النسيان وانقطاع مسائل الفن بعضها من بعض، فيعسر حصول الملكة بتفريقها. وإذا كانت أوائل العلم وأواخره حاضرة عند الفكرة مجانبة للنسيان؛ كانت الملكة أيسر حصولاً، وأحكم ارتباطاً، وأقرب صبغة؛ لأن الملكات إنما تحصل بتتابع الفعل وتكراره، وإذا تنوسي الفعل؛ تنوسيت الملكة ا…
👍5
أهل العلم بمختلف تخصصاتهم واهتماماتهم: هم مرابطون على ثغور الإسلام، ويسدون حاجة الأمة، وهم قائمون على تبليغ دين الله وشرعته، واتباع هدي رسول الله ﷺ وسنته.. ونسأل الله أن يجعلنا هداة مهتدين، غير ضالين ولا مضلين، وأن يستعملنا وأن لا يستبدلنا 🤲🏻..
👍3
حالات الواتس.. أجور من الحسنات، وجسور إلى فعل الخيرات؛ وذلك في كل يوم وليلة.. فكم من تلاوة خاشعة، أو نصيحة صادقة، أو دعوة مباركة، أو كلمة طيبة؟؛ كانت سببًا في تنبيه غافل، أو تعليم جاهل، أو كشف غمة، أو إيقاظ همة.. فلا تستهن بمقاطع خير تعيد نشرها..؛ فإن لك أجرها وأجر من عمل بها.. وانوِ في نشرها الأجر والثواب عنك وعن والديك وعمن تحب من الأحياء أو الأموات، أو عن عموم المسلمين والمسلمات..
👍6
Posted without readable text
اللهم احفظ #بلاد_الحرمين الشريفين، المملكة العربية #السعوديه.. واحفظ أمنها وأمانها، وأرضها وسماءها، وبرها وبحرها، ومن شرقها إلى غربها، ومن جنوبها إلى شمالها.. واحفظ ولاة أمرها وعلماءها ورجال أمنها والمواطنين والمقيمين فيها.. ورد عنها شر الأشرار، وكيد الفجار، وشر طوارق الليل والنهار.. آمين 🤲🏻
👍8👎5
المعين المنبع بشرح الروض المربع أهمية الشرح مع منهج المؤلف رابط التحميل 👇🏻 https://t.me/Drhabaloshi/3157
👍7
💥ندعوكم إلى مجلس لقراءة كتاب: 📔 منهج السالكين وتوضيح الفقه في الدين للشيخ السعدي رحمه الله على الشيخ 🎙 د. حسين بن أحمد البلوشي بقراءته له على ابن عقيل رحمه الله 🗓️ الجمعة ١٤٤٨/٢/٢٤ 🧭 الساعة ١١ مساء بتوقيت مكة بإذن الله تعالى 📍في مجلس واحد بإذن الله على قناة ميراث https://t.me/Meeraath1443 رابط قوقل: https://meet.google.com/unk-mvby-wzs
👍7
منهج الحجاوي -رحمه الله- في التصحيح والترجيح.. ينظر: المعين المنبع بشرح الروض المربع (١/ ٤٦) وما بعدها.
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Drhabaloshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Drhabaloshi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. حسين البلوشي (القناة العلمية)” (@Drhabaloshi), 5,016 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Drhabaloshi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.