Channel
@turki1445
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,913subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001904672211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @turki1445 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/turki1445 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 1,913 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 1,910 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 1,905 | +7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 1,898 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 1,899 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 1,896 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,893 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 1,882 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,881 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
123 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 66 | 53.7% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 39.8% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.07% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
﴿ فَأَوْجَسَ مِنْهُمْ خِيفَةً قَالُوا لَا تَخَفْ وَبَشَّرُوهُ بِغُلَامٍ عَلِيـمٍ ﴾ قال بعض أهل العلم: ومن أدب البشارة: أن لا يُخبَر الإنسانُ بما يسرهُ دَفعةً؛ فإنه [قد] يُورث مرضًا، يدل عليه أنهم جلسوا، واستأنس بهم إبراهيم عليه السلام، ثم قالوا: نُبشرك، ثم ذكروا أشرف النوعين، وهو الذكَر، ولم يقتنعوا به حتى وصفوه بأحسن الأوصاف. يعني: العلم
❤4
Signed د. تركي
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed د. تركي
وإنما سكتَ عن الذي أعطى؛ لأنه مختلفٌ فيه، فلم يرَ التضييقَ عليه فيه. المغني ١٠١/١١
👍3
Signed د. تركي
قال بأبي صلوات ربي وسلامه عليه: "وحيثُما كنتُم فصلُّوا عليَّ، فإنّ صلاتَكم تَبلُغُني". اللهم صلِّ وسلِّم على نبينا محمد
👍5
Signed د. تركي
كتب بعض الفضلاء بحثا في "المسائل الفقهية التي وصفها العلامة المرداوي بالحسن - دراسة استقرائية تحليلية"، وحكم في بعض المجلات العلمية، وسينشر في أحد أعدادها القادمة بإذن الله تعالى عسى الله أن ينفع به، ويتقبله منه ولعل أحدا ينشط لمثله عند عالم آخر، أو في فن آخر، كالأصول مثلا
👍2❤1
Signed د. تركي
نقلَ الشيخُ ابن أبي عمر في 📚 الشرح الكبير عن 📚 المحرر للمجد (رحمة الله عليهما) في مواضع كثيرة .. فهل نعتبر هذا من زيادات الشارح على ما اصطلح عليه؟ ج: نعم.
❤1👍1
Signed د. تركي
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله، كما في مجموع الفتاوى ٢٤٤/٣٥ : ولهذا عقد الفقهاءُ لمسائل الأيمان بابين، أحدهما: باب تعليق الطلاق بالشروط ... والباب الثاني: باب جامع الأيمان، مما يشترك فيه اليمين بالله والطلاق والعتاق وغير ذلك. فيذكرون فيه الحلف بصيغة القسم، وإن دخلت صيغة الجزاء ضمنًا وتبعًا. ومسائلُ أحد البابين مختلطةٌ بمسائل الباب الآخر؛ لاتفاقهما في المعنى كثيرًا أو غالبا. وكذلك طائفةٌ من الفقهاء -كأبي الخطاب …
👍3
Signed د. تركي
#فقهيات
❤4👍1
Signed د. تركي
في 📚 (سنن سعيد بن منصور) : أنّ رجلًا من قريش سألَ سعيدَ بن المُسيّب عن مسألةٍ، فقال: ائتِ عروةَ (يعني: ابن الزبير) فاسأله، ثم ارجع إليَّ فأخبِرني ما يقول لك. فسألَ عروةَ فأجابه، ثم رجع إلى سعيد فأخبره بجواب عروة، فقال: صدقَ عروة، القولُ ما قال. وفيه: أنه لا بأس بمثل هذا الفعل من المفتي والمستفتي، ولا وجه للمنع منه!
❤2👍1
Signed د. تركي
من توفيق الله للعبد وحسن أدبه: أن يلهج بالدعاء لأهل العلم والفضل عند ذكرهم أو قراءة كتبهم
❤7💯3👍2👏2
Signed د. تركي
وقد أحصيتُ فوائد الأمراض، فزادت على مئة فائدة. ابن القيم / 📚 شفاء العليل اللهم اشف مرضانا ومرضى المسلمين
❤7👍4
Signed د. تركي
وحُسنُ القصد من أعون الأشياء على نيل العِلم ودَركه، والعلمُ الشرعيُّ من أعون الأشياء على حُسنِ القصد والعملِ الصالح. 🖋️ أبو العباس ابن تيمية رحمه الله 📚 مجموع الفتاوى
❤7👍4
Signed د. تركي
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @turki1445. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. تركي الذيابي 📚” (@turki1445), 1,913 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turki1445.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.