Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Massoud Vahedi

Channel

Massoud Vahedi

@mavahedi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

358subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002246937439
TypeChannel
Username@mavahedi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mavahedi

Growth

33235834510 August 2026 — 332 subscribers10 August 2026 — 332 subscribers18 August 2026 — 337 subscribers25 August 2026 — 340 subscribers31 August 2026 — 347 subscribers10 September 2026 — 358 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 328–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 06:37358+11
31 Aug 2026, 20:43347+7
25 Aug 2026, 11:57340+3
18 Aug 2026, 20:17337+5
10 Aug 2026, 06:30332no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:16332first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 02s
Average length
6m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1026.3%
💯923.7%
👍718.4%
🤣410.5%
🤡37.89%
👎25.26%
😁25.26%
🤮12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ibn Taymiyyah observes that Heraclius and al-Najashi recognized the truth of Islam and the Prophethood of the Messenger of Allah 'alayhi al-Salam through distinct approaches. Al-Najashi’s recognition was grounded primarily in the message of the Qur’an and the moral and spiritual values it conveyed. Through reflection upon its teachings, he came to the conviction that the one who brought this message could only be a

3👍1

9 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC67 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sheikhfathialmousli

#الفائدة :(733) (فَوَائدُ مِنْ مَجَالسِ شَيْخِنَا أَبِي عَبْدِاللهِ فَتْحِي المَوْصِلْيّ حَفِظَهُ اللهُ). مقدمات علمية : حديثيّة وأصوليّة في تحسين الحديث بتعدد طرقه *المقدمة الأولى* : الحكم على الخبر بالصحة والقبول إنما يكون بحسب أمرين : بحسب صفات ناقليه ، وبحسب تعدد طرقه ؛ وبالتالي القول بعدم التصحيح أو التحسين بتعدد الطرق قادح في أصول الرواية في الدين ومصادم للعقل والعادة . *المقدمة الثانية* : أن طلب التعدد ي

9 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC92 viewsread 10 August 2026

In the Qur’an, the word sa‘i (سَعْي) and its related derivatives does not always literally mean “running.” In most instances, it refers more broadly to hastening or striving to do good deeds (al-mubādarah ilā al-khayr). There are, however, a few verses where sa‘i is used in the context of physically coming or moving quickly: 1. Surah Yā-Sīn, 36:20: وَجَاءَ مِنْ أَقْصَى الْمَدِينَةِ رَجُلٌ يَسْعَىٰ “And a man cam

9 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @HarunSalehMaliki

On the topic of AI, many have seen recently that AI companies are buying rare books to feed to their models and then they destroy the books so that anyone who wants access to that knowledge must go through them. This is also happening with Arabic texts, and it is essential that those who have the means and the know-how preserve rare books. Those who have the knowledge of what books must be purchased and preserved sho

💯3

8 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC126 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

In his critical work al-Radd ʿalā man ittabaʿa ghayr al-madhāhib al-arbaʿa, the great scholar Ibn Rajab complains about how cunning amateurs in his time were falsely claiming to be eminent jurists and qualified to perform independent Ijtihad. But as Ibn Rajab contended, a cursory look at their actual qualifications revealed that they hardly even completed the bare basics; they were actually ignoramuses and neophyt

💯6👎1

8 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC140 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

New motion dropped: Islam does not have clear answers on the economy, so Mamdani and Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed are forced to "push forward" with the "necessary ijtihad".

🤣4🤡3

7 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC138 viewsread 10 August 2026

Paul Krause on the Tensions and Contradictions of the Liberal Order: "If there is a God and a Moral Order, liberalism runs into a problem. Hence the dream of a world without God, without religion, without moral demands. If group feeling outweighs individual hedonistic pleasure, liberalism runs into a problem. Hence the dream of atomistic individualism and the “freeing” of humans from all the bonds of community, trib

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC124 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

قال ابن القيم: "خبر الواحد بحسب الدليل الدال عليه: ١- فتارة يجزم بكذبه لقيام دليل كذبه، ٢- وتارة يظن كذبه إذا كان دليل كذبه ظنيا ، ٣- وتارة يتوقف فيه فلا يترجح صدقه ولا كذبه إذا لم يقم دليل أحدهما ، ٤- وتارة يترجح صدقه ولا يجزم به ، ٥- وتارة يجزم بصدقه جزما لا يبقى معه شك ...

7 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

There is a distinct point where you know that you have read enough in a subject that you are researching, and you can transition from reading to writing. You can't read everything. But you have to read enough to develop a proper "feel" of the topic area you are looking at to write about it correctly and confidently. In many cases, only you can decide when exactly that threshold has been reached, and it is time to s

3👍1

6 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ibn Taymiyyah was arrested and sentenced to prison 7 times during his life. The controversies that sparked most of his prison sentences related to some of his theological views (e.g. those espoused in his book al-Wasitiyyah), legal positions (e.g. shadd al-rihal to the grave of the Prophet 'alayhi al-Salam, divorce), and comments regarding certain personalities (e.g. Ibn 'Arabi).

👍2🤮1

6 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

They told him: "When you finally get your work published, be humble." When he finally got published:

😁2

6 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

It is often said that when the two canonical Hanbali texts, al-Muntahā and al-Iqnāʿ, differ, the ruling in al-Muntahā is always given preference. This, however, is an oversimplification. Although al-Muntahā is generally regarded as the more refined work, there are cases where the position found in al-Iqnāʿ is stronger. For example, if al-Muntahā only indicates a ruling by implication (mafhum), while al-Iqnāʿ states

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mavahedi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Massoud Vahedi” (@mavahedi), 358 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mavahedi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.