Channel
@somaliki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
684subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201988363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @somaliki |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/somaliki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 684 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 684 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 March 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,403 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
282 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 245 | 86.9% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 3.19% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 2.84% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.48% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.13% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.13% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.355% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You can discern the great mercy of Allah in His command that we do things only for His sake. We are creatures charged with action. And we will be judged for those actions. If our motive is to please a loved one, it dies with the passing of our beloved. If our motive is to acquire fame and riches, they end with our passing. However, if what drives us to act is Allah, Allah is Everlasting, Undying.
❤18
I met him when I was in Mauritania. I rode on a very crowded back of a Hilux, crowded with baggage, humans and livestock, hanging on the the edge of the truck for dear life the whole way, which was a few hours on the road, after which, we were dropped off and had to walk another few hours off road to get to Taysīr, his Maḥḍarah (Madrasah village). Taysīr was one of the best organized and laid out Maḥāḍir in all of …
❤13
The land of Shinqit has just lost and mourned one of its great pillars of scholarship, Muhammad al-Hasan Walad Ahmadu al-Khadim al-Yaʿqubi al-Shinqiti. He passed away today. He was one of the top scholars of the Maliki Madhab.
😢8
And they cried out, "O AI, make me a muftī in my image." And it made mistakes but they were not mistakes, because the AI said so and the AI, designed and trained by tech bros, was their proof before God. Over the last few months, I've had several conversations with friends and acquaintances that have exposed unwarranted levels of confidence in the capabilities of LLM models. In one instance, a friend was excited to…
❤14👍1👏1
A word of advice to those who hope to teach one day Shaykh Dr. al-Bashīr ʿIṣām al-Murrākushī (ḥ) says: ❝One of the mistakes made by some who step forward to teach the Islamic sciences is this: A person studies a text, masters it, and then assumes that he is able to teach it. The correct approach is that you cannot teach a text unless you have mastered what lies above it, even if only by one level. For example, i…
❤20
“Verily Allah has His people among the people. The people of the Quran are Allah’s people and His elect.” - Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Narrated in Sahih Al-Jami al-Saghri
❤15
There are a lot of functional tasks that LLMs can do which erase much of the tedium in modern life. I absolutely hate negotiating over cars (I hate negotiating in general), so I co-created* an agent with an LLM to do much of the dirty work. It is important to note that when I say "co-created," I mean that I gave it detailed specs and then did very minimal code review. Though I've created scripts, microservices, and …
❤10👍3
Artistic expression is a tool that can enigmatize patently fallacious ideas, thereby sanitizing them. Some eloquence truly is akin to sorcery in its ability to manipulate and overcome men’s intellects. It truly is a scary realization, especially when you recognize its effects on your own cognition. قال في تفسير ابن كثير: وقوله تعالى : ( يوحي بعضهم إلى بعض زخرف القول غرورا ) أي : يلقي بعضهم إلى بعض القول المزين الم…
❤8
Every time I pass by a billboard or yarn signage for a psychic, I wonder if they know that I’m still not interested and will not be coming in for a session. P.S. Believing psychics can benefit you or are reliable sources of knowledge is filthy shirk.
😁6👍3
It’s kind of sad that you can pretty much guess the person who’s being referenced in the post above. There’s a pattern with the individual referenced that tends towards disdain of Islam and Muslims as well as a penchant for sparking controversy. If you took social media algorithms and deployed it to discover what’s likely to get most engagement with a Muslim audience, you’d probably end up with the same spattering of…
❤23
If you speak incorrectly about the history for why the printing press was "banned" in the Muslim world the first time (c. 2013), chances are your analysis will be wrong the second time as well (2026). Bringing up oversimplistic and Orientalist-inspired narratives like "The Muslims banned the printing press because the scholars feared it" do a disservice to the field of Islamic legal history. It also creates a false…
❤7
What are our obligations as Muslims in times of economic crises such as the one presently looming whereby some 4,000 Americans (many of whom are Muslim) are losing their jobs per day due to restructuring and claims of AI-adoption efficiency? On the one hand, individual Muslims are not obligated to employ people. And the categories of people one is obligated to support is limited, with exceptions for cases of financia…
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @somaliki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Somaliki” (@somaliki), 684 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/somaliki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.