Channel
@Ibn_Aljuzi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,650subscribers
-168 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243497920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ibn_Aljuzi |
| Description | أبو الفرج ابن الجوزي اسمه عبد الرحمن : فقيه حنبلي، مُحدِّث، مشهور بالوعظ البليغ المؤثر، من ذرية الصدِّيق رضي الله عنه، توفي سنة (٥٩٧)هـ. ⚠️قنواتنا : ❶ @siraj_altawhid ➁ @telawat2 ❸ @ibn_Rajab ➃ @ibnrajabf للتواصل: @b2a3e @ibn_aljuzi1 : |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ibn_Aljuzi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 37,650 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 37,657 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 37,650 | -24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 37,674 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 37,688 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:14 | 37,696 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 37,722 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 37,719 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 37,721 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 37,726 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 37,739 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 37,738 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 37,739 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 37,757 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 37,760 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 37,757 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 37,765 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 37,773 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 37,778 | -20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 37,798 | first reading |
170 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (30 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 229,605 |
| Reactions total | 2,661 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,070 reactions across 161 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,986 | 78.6% | |
| 😢 | 905 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 179 | 3.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال يحيى بن معاذ - رحمه الله - : سقمُ الجسد بالأوجاع وسُقم القلوب بالذنوب، فكما لا يجد الجسد لذّة الطعام عند سقمه، فكذلك القلب لا يجد حلاوة العبادة مع الذنوب. 📖 ذم الهوى لابن الجوزي
😢30❤21
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤9
قال ابن الجوزي رحمه الله: تفكرت في نفسي يومًا تفكر محقق، فحاسبتها قبل أن تحاسب، ووزنتها قبل أن توزن، فرأيت اللطف الرباني: فمنذ الطفولة وإلى الآن أرى لطفًا بعد لطف، وسترًا على قبيح، وعفوًا عما يوجب عقوبة، وما أرى لذلك شكرًا إلا باللسان! ولقد تفكرت في خطايا، لو عوقبت ببعضها؛ لهلكت سريعًا، ولو كشف للناس بعضها، لاستحييت. ولا يعتقد معتقد عند سماع هذا أنها من كبائر الذنوب، حتى يظن في ما يظن في الفساق؛ بل هي ذنوب قبيحة …
❤34😢12
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤6
من عرضت له شهوة، فاستعجل لذتها، ونسي عاقبتها، فكم من ندم يتجرعه في باقي عمره، وعتاب يستقبله من بعد موته، وعقاب لا يؤمن وقوعه، كل ذلك للذة لحظة كانت كبرقٍ. 📖 ابن الجوزي | صيد الخاطر
😢42❤25👍5
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤20
قال ابن الجوزى رحمه الله : " واعلم أن أوفى الدخائر: غض الطرف عن محرم، وإمساك اللسان عن فضول كلمة، ومراعاة لحد، وإيثار الله عزّ وجلّ على هوى النفس" . 📜لفتة الكبد في نصيحة الولد
❤38👍8
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤9
إذا كنت عاجزًا عن شهوات نفسك، فكيف تطلب مرافقة الصِّدِّيقين؟!. ابن الجوزي البغدادي
😢52❤17👍4
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤17
تأملوها بقلوبكم وعقولكم قال الإمام ابن الجوزي رحمه الله : فمَن حفظَ لسانهُ لأجلِ الله تعالىٰ في الدنيا . أطلقَ اللهُ لسانهُ بالشهادة عندَ الموتِ ولقاءِ الله تعالىٰ . ومَن سَرَّح لسانهُ في أعراضِ المسلمين اتبعَ عَوراتهم ، أمسكَ اللهُ لسانهُ عن الشهادةِ عند الموت . 【 بحر الدموع (١٢٤/١) 】 لعل ذلك (جزاء وفاقا)
❤47😢18
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @Ibn_Aljuzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَوَاعِظُ اِبْنِ الْجَوْزِيِّ” (@Ibn_Aljuzi), 37,650 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ibn_Aljuzi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.