Channel
@ebn_rjb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,797subscribers
+168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001348444367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ebn_rjb |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ebn_rjb |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 10,797 | +6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 10,791 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 10,783 | +7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 10,776 | +12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 10,764 | +17 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 10,747 | +3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 10,744 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:50 | 10,745 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:32 | 10,737 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 10,736 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 10,732 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 10,731 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 10,721 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 10,720 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 10,713 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 10,706 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 10,709 | +9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 10,700 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 10,703 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 10,711 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (21 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,610 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
وأمَّا شهرُ ولادتِهِ فقد اختُلِفَ فيه، فقيل: في شهر رمضانَ، رُوِي عن عبدِ اللهِ بن عمرو بإسنادٍ لا يَصِحُّ. وقيل: في رَجبٍ، ولا يَصِحُّ. وقيل: في رَبيع الأوَّلِ، وهو المشهورُ بين النَّاسِ، حتَّى نَقَلَ ابنُ الجوزيِّ وغيرُه عليه الاتِّفاقَ، ولكنَّهُ قولُ جُمهُورِ العلماءِ. ثم اخْتَلَفُوا في أيِّ يومٍ كانَ مِنَ الشهرِ، فمنهم مَنْ قال: هو غَيْرُ مُعيَّنٍ، وإنما وُلِدَ في يومِ الاثنينِ من رَبيع الأول من غيرِ تعيينٍ لِعد…
سمي محمداً ﷺ سراجاً منيراً؛ لأن نوره للدنيا كنور الشمس وأتم وأعظم وأنفع. [فتح الباري (340/4) لابن رجب]
وأنتَ لمَّا وُلدت أشرقَت الأرضُ .. فَضاءت بنُورك الأفقُ فَنحنُ في ذلِك الضَياءِ وفي النَورِ .. وَسُبل الرشَادِ نخترقُ [لطائف المعارف (ص/174) لابن رجب]
إخواني! مَن كانَ مِن هذهِ الأُمَّةِ؛ فهوَ مِن خيرِ الأُممِ عندَ اللهِ، قالَ تَعالى: {كُنْتُمْ خَيْرَ أُمَّةٍ أُخْرِجَتْ لِلنَّاسِ}.. لمَّا كانَ هذا الرَّسولُ النَّبيُّ الأُمِّيُّ خيرَ الخلقِ وأفضلَهم عندَ اللهِ سبحانَهُ؛ كانَتْ أُمَّتُهُ خيرَ أُمَّةِ وأفضلَها، فما يَحْسُنُ بمَن كانَ مِن خيرِ الأممِ وانْتَسَبَ إلى متابعةِ خيرِ الخلقِ وأفضلِهِم.. إلَّا أنْ يَكونَ متَّصفًا بصفاتِ الخيرِ مجتنبًا لصفاتِ الشَّرِّ، وقبيحٌ ب…
نبوَّة النبي ﷺ كانت مذكُورة معرُوفة من قبل أن يخلُقَه الله ويُخرِجَهُ إلى دار الدُّنيا حيًّا، وأنَّ ذلك كان مكتُوباً في أُمِّ الكتاب من قبلِ نفخِ الرُّوحِ في آدم عليه السلام. [لطائف المعارف (ص/158) لابن رجب]
فإنَّ مُحمَّدًا صلى الله عليه وسلَّم هو المقصودُ من خَلقِ النَّوع الإنسانيِّ، وهُو عينُه، وخُلاصته، وواسطة عقدِهِ. [لطائف المعارف (ص/162) لابن رجب]
يا بني آدمَ صُونوا دينَكم ينبغي لِلدّينِ أن لا يُطَّرَحْ واحمَدوا اللهَ الذي أكرَمَكُم بِنَبيٍّ قام فيكُم فنَصَحْ بِنَبيٍّ فَتَحَ اللَهُ بِهِ كُلَّ خَيرٍ نِلتُموهُ وَشَرَح مُرسَلٌ لَو يُوزَنُ الناسُ بِهِ في التُقى وَالبِرِّ خفُّوا وَرَجَح فَرَسولُ اللَهِ أَولى بِالعُلى وَرَسولُ اللَهِ أَولى بِالمِدَح [لطائف المعارف (ص/181) لابن رجب]
من سار على طريق الرسول ﷺ ومنهاجه وإن اقتصد فإنه يسبق من سار على غير طريقه وإن اجتهد. مَنْ لِي بِمِثْلِ سَيْرِكَ الْمُدَلَّلِ تَمْشِي رُوَيْدًا وَتَجِي فِي الْأَوَّلِ [لطائف المعارف (ص/255) لابن رجب]
فإنّ أعظم نعم الله على هذه الأمّة إظهار محمد صلّى الله عليه وسلّم لهم وبعثته وإرساله إليهم، كما قال تعالى: {لَقَدْ مَنَّ اللهُ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذْ بَعَثَ فِيهِمْ رَسُولاً مِنْ أَنْفُسِهِمْ}. فإنّ النّعمة على الأمّة بإرساله أعظم من النّعمة عليهم بإيجاد السّماء، والأرض، والشّمس، والقمر، والرّياح، والليل، والنّهار، وإنزال المطر، وإخراج النبات، وغير ذلك؛ فإنّ هذه النّعم كلّها قد عمّت خلقا من بني آدم كفروا بالله وب…
📚 شرحٌ لحديث: «السبعة الذين يظلهم الله في ظله يوم لا ظل إلا ظله» للإمام ابن رجب الحنبلي رحمه الله، مع شرحٍ وتعليقٍ لفضيلة الشيخ الدكتور محمد ابن طوق المري. شرحٌ يجمع بين التأصيل العلمي، واللطائف الإيمانية، والفوائد التربوية، بأسلوبٍ محررٍ واضح، يعين على فهم هذا الحديث العظيم والعمل بما فيه.
(كانت لي نفسٌ توَّاقة، فكنت لا أنال منها شيئًا إلا تاقت إلى ما هو أعظم، فلما بلغت نفسي الغاية، تاقت إلى الآخرة) عمر بن عبد العزيز حلية الأولياء (5/331). وهذه هي علامة العقل والبصيرة؛ فإن مطالب الدنيا في كثير من الأحيان إذا نالها العبد، تهون في عينه، وينكشف له أنها ليست الغاية التي تُفنى الأعمار في طلبها. فالدنيا مهما اتسعت، ومهما علت منازلها إلى انقضاء، وإنما المؤمن يستعين بها على طاعة ربه، ويتزود منها لآخرته. فإذ…
قَسَّمَ من قَسَّمَ من العُلَمَاءِ العلم إِلى باطن وظاهر، فالباطن: ما باشر القلوب فأثمر لها الخشية والخشوع، والتعظيم والإجلال، والمحبة والأنس والشوق. والظاهر: ما كان على اللسان، فبه تقوم حجة الله على عباده. وكتب وهب بن منبه إلى مكحول: "إِنَّكَ امْرُؤٌ قَدْ أَصَبْتَ بِمَا ظَهَرَ لَكَ مِنْ عِلْمِ الْإِسْلَامِ شَرَفًا فَاطْلُبْ بِمَا بَطَنَ مِنْ عِلْمِ الْإِسْلَامِ مَحَبَّةً وَزُلْفَى". وفي رواية أخرى أنّه كتب إليه: "…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ebn_rjb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لطائف ابن رجب” (@ebn_rjb), 10,797 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebn_rjb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.