Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
قناة | الغيث الشامي (طالب علم)
@AboObadaShami
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,812subscribers
+70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001392681596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AboObadaShami |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AboObadaShami |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 11,812 | +10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 11,802 | +11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 11,791 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 11,794 | +21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 11,773 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 11,770 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 11,756 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:07 | 11,752 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 11,750 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 11,746 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 11,745 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 11,744 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 11,740 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,738 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 11,740 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 11,735 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 11,738 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 11,756 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 11,760 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 11,751 | first reading |
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.89%
- avg views ÷ 11,812 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 813
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.72%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 97 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 32,534 |
| Reactions total | 391 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
972 reactions across 73 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 622 | 64.0% | |
| 👍 | 216 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 3.40% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 2.78% | |
| 🕊 | 19 | 1.95% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 1.75% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 1.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 1.13% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.514% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.514% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.514% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 972 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 26
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 26
- of 97 we hold a reading for · 27%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AboObadaShami. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 97 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
المقاصدية المنضبطة حقٌ وخير؛ أما المقاصدية الزائغة فهي جهاز فكري يلبس عمامة الفقه، أكبر إشكالاتها التعبير الإنشائي السائل غير المنضبط عن مفهوم المصلحة وتطبيقاتها.
❤8👍4✍1
طبعا المقال كتبته في فكرة سخافة بناء هذا النوع من المذاهب الأخلاقية الرديئة وأنها مجرد نتوء متشوه من الأخلاق البشرية الطبيعية البعض فهم أني أحاول أقنعه يجيب أطفال ويصير رجل : ) محد مهتم، لا تحول قلة تستسترونك لمذهب أخلاقي وتكبر الموضوع.
❤6
شذرات في نقد الأخلاق غير الطبيعية (اللا إنجابية - النباتية - إلخ..) المقصود بالأخلاق غير الطبيعية هنا ليس أن كل ما يقع في الطبيعة حسن، ولا أن مجرد كون الفعل طبيعيًا يجعله أخلاقيًا. فالطبيعة من حيث هي طبيعة صامتة أخلاقيًا؛ الأسد لا يرتكب جريمة حين يفترس الغزال، والبركان لا يظلم من يهلكهم، والمرض لا يكون شريرًا حين يقتل صاحبه. والمقصود نوع آخر من الخلل: أن تُنتزع قيمة جزئية من داخل الحياة الإنسانية، كمنع الألم أو عدم …
❤5
إنها تحفظ الثقة، وتمنع العدوان، وتنظم الحقوق، وتحفظ الأسرة، وتجعل التعاون ممكنًا. الأخلاق اجتماعية بطبعها من هذه الجهة؛ لا بمعنى أن المجتمع يخلق الحقيقة اعتباطًا، بل بمعنى أن الممارسة الأخلاقية تعمل داخل فضاء العلاقات البشرية، وتملك وظيفة واقعية سببية في استمرار الحياة الاجتماعية وازدهارها. 8 ولهذا لا نستطيع أخذ لفظ «ينبغي» ثم إلحاقه بأي تصور فلسفي، ثم مطالبة الناس بأن يعاملوه بالقوة الأخلاقية نفسها. حين يقال: «ينبغي…
❤3
وإن قيل: لأن هناك من يحبه، صارت العلاقات قيمة. وكلما حاولنا منع القتل، أعدنا إلى ميزان الأخلاق القيم التي أُخرجت عند النظر إلى الطفل الممكن. 16 لنفترض أنني أسافر مع طفلي، وهناك احتمال ثلاثون في المئة أن يمسك به قطاع الطرق ويعذبوه ثم يقتلوه، وأستطيع الآن قتله بطريقة لا تؤلمه. هل أقتله؟ إن كان منع الألم هو القيمة الغالبة، فقد يبدو ذلك معقولًا: حولت احتمال ألم شديد إلى موت بلا ألم. لكننا لا نسمي هذا حماية. لقد ألغيت صاح…
❤4
25 الأخلاق نشأت داخل حياة، وتتعامل مع حياة، وتنظم علاقات الأحياء، وتزن الأفعال بحسب ما فيها من كمال ونقص، ومصلحة ومفسدة، وعدل وظلم، وحق واستحقاق. فإذا جاء مذهب وجعل أفضل انتصار للأخلاق هو اختفاء موضوع الأخلاق نفسه، فقد آن له أن يراجع المبدأ الذي بدأ منه. فليس السؤال الأخير: كيف نمنع أكبر مقدار ممكن من الألم؟ بل: ما الذي نريد حفظه حين نمنع الألم؟ فإن كان الجواب: الإنسان وحياته وكماله، فهمنا لماذا كانت الرحمة خيرًا. أم…
❤5
Sticker, posted without a caption
يقول فيتجنشتاين في كتابه «في اليقين» (On Certainty): «ما أحتاج إلى إظهاره هو أن الشك ليس ضروريًا حتى عندما يكون ممكنًا. إن إمكان قيام اللعبة اللغوية لا يعتمد على الشك في كل ما يمكن أن يكون موضع شك. ويرتبط هذا بدور التناقض في الرياضيات.» في الممارسة الإنسانية العملية للمعرفة، يكون اليقين نفسه سياقيًا. فلو سألني أحد: «هل أنت على يقين أنك قلت كذا؟»، ففي سياق يومي سيكفيني أن أكون على يقين من أنني قلت جملة تؤدي المعنى نف…
❤8👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله: "فكل من أعرض عن الطريقة السلفية الشرعية الإلهية، فإنه لا بد أن يضل ويتناقض، ويبقى في الجهل المركب أو البسيط." «درء تعارض العقل والنقل» (5/ 356)
✍7❤6👍4
"وحد الاقتصاد بين هذا الانحلال كله وبين جمود الحنابلة دقيق غامض لا يطلع عليه إلا الموفقون الذين يدركون الأمور بنور إلهي لا بالسماع ثم إذا انكشفت لهم أسرار الأمور على ما هي عليه نظروا إلى السمع والألفاظ الواردة فما وافق ما شاهدوه بنور اليقين قرروه وما خالف أولوه فأما من يأخذ معرفة هذه الأمور من السمع المجرد فلا يستقر له فيها قدم" إحياء علوم الدين (1/ 104) قال شيخ الإسلام معلقًا على كلام أبي حامد: قلت: "هذا الكلام مض…
❤9👍4✍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @AboObadaShami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@AboObadaShami edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 30 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@IbnTaymiyyah_Quotaions · 1,3159 postsقناة | الغيث الشامي (الأبحاث)
@ResearchHunter · 1,6073 postsمرقاة المعرفة | حسام المالكي
@AlMalikiAscension · 482 postsمحمد بن رمضان
@Qataaada · 1,7002 postsتَحري الْحَّق
@Sc_1d_or_d1 · 6102 postsقناة|| أَريبُ الإِسلام
@areb2 · 3782 postsقناة || لماذا أنا 😎✌️📿
@asgsgshbdbx · 3172 postsقناة | أسامة بن محمد هاشم 📖
@osamaHashemR · 4622 postsكُناشَةُ الخُوارِزْمِيّ
@AthariKunnasha · 8911 postكُناشة ابن حامد
@Bohliqah · 1131 postقناة|| نواف بن أحمد السعيدي
@Dnawif · 6291 postالمعتصم بالله الأثري
@Hozaifa74 · 481 postسفيان الثوري | العلم
@alailm00 · 4351 postروايات و رد شبهات🗿☝🏻
@alnukhas40 · 3961 postالمدونة الأثرية
@blog1222 · 2881 postالدُرَرُ السَنيَّة
@drrsenya · 1,4011 postبيانُ مخالفات الأشاعرة للصراط المستقيم
@goah26 · 5521 postمِشْكَاة
@l_gr12 · 91 postفوائد في العلوم
@mattersofknowledge · 561 postحلية القلب
@modwanael · 5651 postعلي أن أنظر
@nazarafulan · 461 postسديم
@sodium100 · 891 postСтоит взглянуть
@stoitvzglyanutt · 1251 postتثوير الذخا.ئر على الإرجاء المعاصر
@thakhaer · 121 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@ResearchHunter · 1,6079 postsكناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,0845 postsإِتْحَافُ الأَرِيبْ || أَبُو عِكْرِمَة
@mustakeen · 13,0933 postsعبدالله الوهيبي
@aalwhebey · 26,5672 postsقناة بدر آل مرعي
@badrth313 · 58,6422 postsيوسف سمرين
@yousefsom · 11,5102 postsقناة/ د. محمد السيد محمد
@AAAAAEGGHySRffBDdtHPiw · 3,7361 postالمخزن التيمي / القيّمي
@IbnTaymiyyah_Quotaions · 1,3151 postقناة || م أ
@MaherAmeer · 9,3991 postآدَم بْن مُحَمَّد المَالِكِي
@adambno78 · 8,0161 postقناة - الفقير لربه القدير
@alfakeer_lrbh · 1,4901 postالانتصار لأهل الحديث والآثار
@almaqdisy_al7anbali · 9,6721 postمحسن بوعكاز
@mohsinbouakkaze · 1,6591 postقناة | أسامة بن محمد هاشم 📖
@osamaHashemR · 4621 postالمِحَفَظَة التَيمِية القَيمِية
@xeufkhyhijijiklpy · 3001 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alkulife · 49,568
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
@MShmsDin · 23,358
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@rabbatulkhodor · 26,935
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@makanyworld · 188,208
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
@Archive_Makany_World · 43,790
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@Ruqyah011 · 23,879
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@abntaymia3 · 51,342
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@KOTOB_ISLAMIC · 82,509
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@basemelewa · 30,017
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@lovekotob · 499,906
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@salaftime · 30,563
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@archive_makany · 28,099
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@lmakitat · 30,756
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
@islamhis4 · 97,234
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
@ProgrammingAdvices · 44,972
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
@UmahShield · 29,837
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@aladwey · 52,832
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@Elmacademy1 · 35,464
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@koutobi · 75,177
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@qwaedalelom · 23,191
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
@T5yll_SA · 26,699
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@Nafae3 · 105,827
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@uraware2014 · 218,784
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@othmanalkamees · 81,588
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة | الغيث الشامي (طالب علم)” (@AboObadaShami), 11,812 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AboObadaShami.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.