Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الغازي محمد

Channel

الغازي محمد

@alghazi_m

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,075subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001280601035
TypeChannel
Username@alghazi_m
Descriptionعلى المرء أن يسعى حثيثًا أن يكون جديرًا بآرائه 📖 https://www.goodreads.com/alghazi_m ❓ https://revospring.net/@alghazim ✉️ E-Mail: [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/alghazi_m

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,9819,0949,037.56 August 2026 — 8,996 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,996 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,000 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,993 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,992 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,981 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,989 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,989 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,997 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,013 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,010 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,022 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,094 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,085 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,090 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,080 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,086 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,082 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,076 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,080 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,077 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,075 subscribers9,0756 August 20262 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,964–9,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 18:079,075-2
30 Oct 2026, 12:409,077-3
27 Oct 2026, 04:409,080+4
24 Oct 2026, 06:299,076-6
21 Oct 2026, 10:019,082-4
18 Oct 2026, 09:569,086+6
15 Oct 2026, 08:119,080-10
12 Oct 2026, 11:419,090+5
5 Oct 2026, 20:189,085-9
28 Sept 2026, 07:169,094+72
15 Sept 2026, 22:029,022+12
12 Sept 2026, 15:399,010-3
3 Sept 2026, 07:589,013+16
30 Aug 2026, 18:048,997+8
27 Aug 2026, 23:148,989+4
25 Aug 2026, 04:038,985-4
22 Aug 2026, 09:268,989+8
19 Aug 2026, 06:198,981-11
16 Aug 2026, 16:198,992-1
13 Aug 2026, 04:038,993first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 9,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held31 (26 January 2025 – 7 October 2026)
Views total3,650
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 21:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈11
Links
≈326

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,867 reactions across 31 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,26767.9%
😢27114.5%
👍1075.73%
❤‍🔥532.84%
😁331.77%
💔321.71%
👏191.02%
🕊140.75%
🔥110.589%
🤔100.536%
🫡100.536%
💯90.482%
🤣80.428%
⚡70.375%
😨50.268%
🤝50.268%
👀20.107%
👨‍💻20.107%
😍10.054%
🥰10.054%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2025 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,390 views27 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @kareemahelmy

عن ضرب الأبناء والطلبة!

❤27

5 Oct 2026, 09:47 UTC≈2,260 views23 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤15🤔8

21 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC≈3,540 views53 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[4/4] ثم ستفاجئك نفسُك، وستتفاجئ من نفسك، وستبص لروحك فجأة، تلاقيك كبرت فجأة، لما تقرأ كتاب فتلاقيه بيسحبك نحو آخر - من نفسه - ويملي عليك مواضيع بعينها لتسأل عن كتب فيها بعينها، وستجد أنك بدأت تصنع قائمتك بنفسك وستنسى أمر القائمة الأولى تمامًا، لأنك الآن بات عندك "أسئلة" وبات لديك "أهداف خاصة"، فتكون وظيفة الترشيح حينها أن يختصر عليك الطريق ويوفّر عليك هدر الوقت في غير مظنة الإجادة، فتنفع نفسك، وتنتفع من غيرك، وتلك و…

❤44💯4🤝3🥰1😢1

21 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC≈2,490 views21 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[3/4] (2) أما الثانية، فهي أني العام الماضي هذا، قرأت كتابًا ما، فهدم لي رفًا كاملًا من مكتبتي، أنا لا أقول لك "لم اقرأ"، بل لو أدركتني قبل أن أفتح هذا الكتاب بيوم، وطلبت مني ترشيحًا في موضوع الكتاب هذا، لقلت لك كتبًا رصينة للغاية، بل فوق الرصينة، كتبًا هي عُمدٌ في هذا المجال، وافهم عنّي: هذا الكتاب هدم الرفّ لكنه لم يهدم الكتب، يعني أعاد ترتيب كل شيء فيه وفق نمط جديد، وكشف لي عن مساحات ما كنتُ أعلمها ووجب عليّ من حي…

❤19😢2

21 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC≈1,980 views20 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[2/4] الآن، ما كتبت لك هذا لأتظاهر أمامك بحصيلتي المعرفية المهولة، وأقول لك انظر من أعرف ومن لا أعرف، ويأتيك خبر هذا لاحقًا. إنما كتبتها لأنها نماذج على "حسن" استخدام قوائم القراءة، ففي الأولى القراءة هي قراءة "منهجية" بحق، لأنها ببساطة قراءة تعليم وتحصيل، ليس قراءة ثقافة أو إطلّاع، فهي مصممّة أصلًا لتقرأها دارسًا، متدرجة في الموضوع والدرجة، محددة الموضوع جدًا، أنا هذا الأسبوع والذي يليه لن اقرأ إلّا عن "تحولات الاقت…

❤20

21 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC≈2,210 views27 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[1/4] في قوائم القراءة، وواضعها، وطالبها، وحاملها، ومن حُملت إليه. === أكثر ما جاءني من رسائل بعد منشوري الأخير هذا، كان طلبات لترشيحات "قوائم" كتب في موضوعه، وليس موضوعه بواحد أصلًا، لكن ما علينا. وبدايةً أقول لكل من راسل مشكورًا على ثقته فيّ وائتمانه إياي على ما يقرأ: لست أعني واحدًا منكم بما سأتكلم فيه فلا يحمّلنكم ما سأكتب على أن تظنّوا أني انزعجت من أشخاصكم أو من طلبكم بعينه، إنما هو كلام عام في شأن عام. المنشو…

❤24💯3

26 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈6,210 views52 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[تكملة] إذا ساحَ الناسُ في مناقشة آثار الذكاء الاصطناعي على العمالة والاقتصاد، فإني لا أغرق في "التنبؤات"، أنا أعرف أن العلاقة بين التكنولوجيا والعمل مسألة قتلت بحثًا وإني سأتناول كلام ريكاردو في فصل "حول الآلات" وكلام ماركس في رأس المال، وكلام المنظّر الفلاني حول عمّال المعرفة، وكلام آخر حول العمل الذهني، وكلام آخر حول القوة التفاوضية.. إلخ، وحتّى لو كنت من النيوكلاسيك فسأنظر في "الطلب الفعّال".. وفلان الفلاني، الم…

❤30😢11💔5🕊4🤔2

26 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈6,050 views40 reactionsread 3 November 2026

لا تذهلنّ عن الطين وأنت تدعو بالمطر.. تأملات شِبه شخصية. 'There are no side effects – just effects,' - John Sterman حتى أشجعنا نادرًا ما يملك شجاعة تحمُّل كل ما يَعْلم... - نيتشه تمنّيت .. تمنّيت أن أفهم العالم، أردتُ أن أفهم لماذا تحدث الأشياء، لماذا نحن على ما نحن عليه؟ تمنّيت أن أفهم معاناتي، أردتُ أن أفهم لماذا جرت على ما جرت عليه الأشياء، ولماذا أنا على ما أنا عليه؟ تمنّيت أن أفهم الآخرين، أردتُ أن أفهم لماذا …

❤24😢7❤‍🔥4👏3🕊2

26 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈3,160 views18 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢8🕊6❤2💯2

13 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈4,190 views73 reactionsread 3 November 2026

اللهم ارحم عبدك أشرف شهاب. اللهم اشمله بحنانك وعطفك وواسع جودك وعظيم كرمك. اللهم كن له وكن معه واجعله يوم القيامة تحت ظلّ عرشك واجعل مقامه عندك في أعلى عليين، واسقه من كوثر حبيبك المصطفى صلّى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم، ومتعّه بالنظر إلى وجهك الكريم. آهٍ يا صاحبي، إن للشوق لحرقة واللهِ .. كم فتّشت في الناس بعدكَ فما وجدت عدلك ولا نصيفك. إذا قلتُ هذا حين أسلو يهيجني — نسيم الصبا من حيث يطّلع الفجر

😢60❤11🕊2

26 May 2026, 21:10 UTC≈7,430 views48 reactionsread 3 November 2026

[....] — الفقرة التي يُذكر فيها أنه دا كتاب مش جامد. «دا كتاب مش جامد» أبدًا. — الفقرة التي يُذكر فيها ليه دا كتاب مش جامد؟، أو فقرة شغل العلماء. عيب هذا الكتاب الأساسي هو وجه آخر لميزته الأساسية، الكتاب كما قلنا يغطي طيفًا واسعًا من المواضيع من جهة، وبإيجاز شديد من جهة أخرى، فماذا كان؟ كان كل خير يا سيدي، بس القصد يعني، أنه اللي عارف شيء أزيد مما في الكتاب وأعمق عن أي واحد من الأسماء المذكورة فيه، سيجد أن بعض المع…

❤32❤‍🔥6😁6😢3⚡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @alghazi_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

نايف بن نهار
@nayefbinnahar · 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
عبدالله الوهيبي
@aalwhebey · 26,865
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
T
@tea_sugar · 21,847
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
رواسخ
@Rawasekh · 31,594
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
مكتبة سُرَ مَن قَرأ
@soramnqraa · 93,280
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة: خالد بهاء الدين
@Kbahaa · 23,618
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
المكتبة العامة
@almaktabaalamma · 25,473
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
مكتبة الرضا - كتب إلكترونية مجانية
@elredabooks · 24,160
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
المعرفة للجميع كتب الإلكترونية
@M3RFAHALKOTOB · 24,738
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
عِرفان
@aerfanalruooh · 38,727
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
السبيل
@al_sabeel · 23,948
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
Dr Mostafa Saad Ibrahim
@mostvision · 28,690
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,786
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
أفكار وأسْمَار
@alnatheerr · 32,585
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
رف كتب 📖
@WakeeelZz_books · 24,389
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
قطوف - علّموا الناس الخير
@Qutooff · 102,571
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Dr Hossam Mokhtar - د. حسام مختار
@drhosammokhtar · 26,860
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
مُسدَّد
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,481
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Metras - متراس
@metrasweb · 21,350
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
أحمد أبو الفتوح
@Afotouhll · 40,266
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
المعرفة للجميع كتب كندل ‏Kindle
@KindleKotob · 25,193
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
📒مكتبة الرافد الشاملة📖✒📚
@EncyclopediaofBooks · 34,848
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
مكتبة شغف
@Passion_1 · 26,574
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
عالم الكتاب
@ahn2323 · 60,751
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 78 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الغازي محمد” (@alghazi_m), 9,075 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alghazi_m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.