This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net +488. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,624–11,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 22:41
11,185
+33
6 Sept 2026, 13:38
11,152
+44
4 Sept 2026, 01:40
11,108
-8
2 Sept 2026, 15:37
11,116
-4
1 Sept 2026, 17:34
11,120
+7
31 Aug 2026, 18:33
11,113
+1
30 Aug 2026, 15:32
11,112
+7
29 Aug 2026, 13:35
11,105
+4
28 Aug 2026, 12:56
11,101
+53
27 Aug 2026, 09:54
11,048
+72
26 Aug 2026, 06:17
10,976
+32
25 Aug 2026, 07:03
10,944
+20
24 Aug 2026, 10:25
10,924
+10
22 Aug 2026, 16:53
10,914
+27
21 Aug 2026, 07:06
10,887
+15
20 Aug 2026, 08:52
10,872
+44
19 Aug 2026, 12:12
10,828
+39
18 Aug 2026, 14:13
10,789
+9
17 Aug 2026, 10:42
10,780
+17
15 Aug 2026, 18:07
10,763
first reading
Engagement
199 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.15%
avg views ÷ 11,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 199 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
199 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
157,576
Reactions total
3,731
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 59s
Average length
2m 10s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,950 reactions across 195 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,779
96.5%
😢
106
2.14%
🥰
52
1.05%
👍
13
0.263%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 199 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
..
قال سيدي الشيخ سامي معوض رضي الله عنه:
قُدّر في علم الله الأزليّ القديم أنه سيفرض على أمة نبيّه صلى الله عليه وسلم خمس صلوات في اليوم والليلة، وكان من الممكن أن يُعلمه بذلك من أول الأمر في رحلة المعراج، ولكنه - والله أعلم- أراد أن يُظهر لنا مزيد شرف هذا النبي المكرَّم ومدَى إدلاله على الله وحُبّ الله له، فجعلها خمسين، ثم حمَله على أن يطلب التخفيف، فيجيبه، ثم يطلب فيجيبه، فقضى له في كل مرة حاجة، حتى وصلت إلى خَمس،…
في مجلس من مجالس المولد المباركة الشريفة بشرف المذكور الممدوح فيها صلى الله عليه وسلم: مرت علي اليوم قصة الإسراء والمعراج وسعي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فينا عند ربه ليخفف الصلاة المكتوبة علينا، جاءني خاطر يقول:
لو طلب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أكثر من ذلك لأُعطي، فلا يسع الحبيب إلا أن يلبي ما يريده حبيبه، ولو كان حقه الذي يريد أن يستوفيه.
اللهم صل وسلم وزد وبارك عليه وعلى آله وصحبه.
لما نزل العلامة عبد الحميد قُدّس بأرض المدينة وحل بطابة دار الحبيب الشفيع، قال:
وفي دار الرَّسولِ أروم أحظى
بِلَثْم تُرَابِهَا العَطِرِ الشَّذيِّ
لعلي أن أنال بحُر وجهي
مكانًا مسَّه قدم النبيِّ
رزقنا الله تعالى كمال الأدب، بحضرة سيد العجم والعرب، صلى الله وسلم عليه وعلى آله، ومَنَّ علينا باتباعه، وعظم محبته ونواله.
أحسب أن من مناقب أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أنهم سمعوا هذا القرآن العربي المبين المعجز، ثم قرت به أفئدتهم في صدورهم، وسكنت له جوارحهم، وانقادت به نفوسهم، ثم لم يَقضِ أحدُهم رهبةً ووجلًا وهيبة من سَطوة هذا البيان المهيب والقول الشديد.
وإن المرء منا لو أحاط علمُه بشيء من علمِ العرب بلسانها، من غير أن يكون هذا بيانَه الذي به معاشه ومغتداه ومراحه، ثم سمع القرآن بهذه الأذن = كاد أن يُغشَى عليه لفرط ما يهوله من نظ…
في مصنف عبد الرزاق:
أن النبي ﷺ دعا أبا بكر فاستعذره من عائشة، فبينا هما عنده، قالت: إنك لتقول: إنك لنبيٌّ، فقام إليها أبو بكر فضرب خدَّها، فقال النبي ﷺ: «مَه يا أبا بكر، ما لهذا دعوناك».
لعائشة رضي الله عنها جسرة بين يدي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لأنها تعلم مكانها منه عذرًا وتلافيًا للعثرة تكون منها في المنطق والفعل رضي الله عنها.
وللمُحبِّ جَسرةٌ بين يدي حبيبه يأمنُ فيها عواقبَ فعله، لأنه مطمئن إليه غير خائفٍ من ت…
بالله ما قولي وكيف خطابي
أم ما يكون لدى السؤال جوابي!
إن جئت أنوي بالقصيدِ إليكم
زلفى وإلا ما اهتديتُ صوابي
هل لي إلى أعتابكم من بُلغةٍ
أم لي إلى ذاك الحمى من بابِ
أم لي إلى نجوىً هناك وسيلةٌ
لتبوح زفراتُ الفؤاد بما بي
لكن إذا كان النوى لي قسمةً
فالصبرُ آخرُ عدّتي لمُصابي
ولقد رضيت بلوعتي وتولُّهي
وسهاد أجفاني وقلبي الصابي
يا قلب زِد في الشوق حتى ينتهى
بي في ديار مقامةِ الأحباب
دع ذكرَ كل مواجِد النفس التي
أضن…
«فيه آياتٌ بينات مقام إبراهيم».
- إذا كان موضع قيام سيدنا إبراهيم عليه السلام من الكعبة جُعل فيه آيات بينات للمتفكرين، فما بالك بمثوى سيد الخلق صلى الله عليه وسلم في مدينته الغراء!
- وفيها تعظيم الله تعالى لمواطن الصالحين وحث على التأمل والتفكر في مقامهم فيها.
- وفي هذا حث على تلمس المواضع التي وطئتها أقدامه الشريفة صلى الله عليه وسلم وطول التفكر في آيات الله تعالى في مقامه فيها.
- وفيها ملمح شريف من وجوه تفضيل م…
فيه ومنه وإليه صلى الله عليه وسلم.
وصل إلى طيبة الطيبة به بأبي هو وأمي
❤45
Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @ShamaeloftheProphet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ShamaeloftheProphet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
جَامِعْ تُرَاثِ المِنْشَاوِيْ 📻 @El_minshawy · 109,013 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
بلاغةٌ. @Balaghaton · 54,049 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
عِرفان @aerfanalruooh · 38,694 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
نايف بن نهار @nayefbinnahar · 34,190 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
قناة الأستاذ / أحمد سالم @ahmedsalem81 · 60,613 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
طَاقَةُ بِالمُوجَب - الرسمية @Taqat_bialmujab · 70,472 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
موسوعة الشيخ المنشاوي @AlminshawiEncyclopedia · 52,455 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
حُبَابَة• @Hobaba7 · 60,280 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
أفكار وأسْمَار @alnatheerr · 32,433 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
قطوف - علّموا الناس الخير @Qutooff · 104,160 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
تراث الأدب العربيّ @toratheladabelarabi · 36,278 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شِيَمُ النَّبيِّ ﷺ” (@ShamaeloftheProphet), 11,185 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShamaeloftheProphet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.