Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
أكاديمية المسلم الصغير للتحفيظ والتربية ♥️
@elmoslem_elsaghir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,304subscribers
-331 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001452560143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elmoslem_elsaghir |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elmoslem_elsaghir |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 22,304 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 22,324 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 22,334 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 22,349 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 22,365 | -29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 22,394 | -24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 22,418 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 22,432 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 22,439 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 22,449 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 22,463 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 22,473 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 22,480 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 22,494 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 22,498 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 22,504 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 22,513 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 22,520 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 22,534 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 22,540 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.92%
- avg views ÷ 22,304 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 205
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.896%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,053 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13m 39s
- Average length
- 2m 44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
فيه آية أو سورة، أول ما ابنك يقرأها بصوته، قلبك بيقع. مش لأنها أصعب حاجة حفظها، لكن فيها حاجة تخصك انت. قولنا هي إيه، وليه دي بالذات 🤍
البراء ختم القرآن كامل. 🤍 الشهادة دي مش ورقة. دي نهاية طريق مشيه طفل، حصة ورا حصة، وسورة ورا سورة، ومراجعة ورا مراجعة. والطريق ده مكانش سهل عليه. فيه أيام كان زهقان، وأيام نسي فيها، وأيام كان عايز يسيب. وده طبيعي — ده بيحصل مع كل طفل بيحفظ. الفرق إن كان فيه حد ماسك إيده: معلّمة تسمع له كل يوم، ومشرف بيتابع، وأهل صابروا معاه. نسأل الله يجعله من أهل القرآن العاملين به، ويثبت حفظه، ويرزقه أخلاق أهله. مبروك يا البراء 🌟
❤2👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
هل نريد لأبنائنا أن يكونوا مجرد نسخة من المجتمع من حولهم؟ أن يتأثروا بكل فكرة جديدة… وأن يقلدوا كل ما يرونه… وأن يحدد لهم الهاتف والسوشيال ميديا ما يحبون وما يكرهون وما يؤمنون به؟ أم نريد أن نبني فيهم شخصية إسلامية قوية تعرف من هي، وماذا تريد، وعلى أي شيء تثبت؟ “لا يكن ابنك إمَّعة…” من هنا جاءت فِطرة؛ رحلة تربوية تساعد أبناءنا على فهم أنفسهم، وبناء هويتهم، وحفظ فطرتهم وسط عالم يحاول أن يعيد تشكيلها كل يوم. 📚 في …
سؤال نريد إجابتكم عليه بصدق، بعيدًا عن المجاملات: لو قال لك ابنك يومًا: **«لا أريد أن أقرأ القرآن»**، كيف سيكون رد فعلك؟ ربما يغضب بعضنا، وربما يرتفع صوتنا… لكن هل الصراخ يحل المشكلة فعلًا؟ أم أنه قد يُنهي الموقف اليوم ويترك أثرًا أكبر في الغد؟ نريد أن نتعلم من تجاربكم: كيف تتصرفون في مثل هذا الموقف؟ اكتبوا لنا في التعليقات، فلعل تجربة أحدكم تكون سببًا في أن نتعلم جميعًا طريقة أفضل. 🤍
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
آراء أولياء الأمور في حلقات تحفيظ المسلم الصغير حابب تحجز ( حصة تجريبية مجانا ) تقرر بعدها تكمل معنا أو لا اضغط على الرابط👇 . http://Wa.me/201065263121
سألنا طالب: رأيك إيه في الأكاديمية؟ قال: «أفضل مما كنت أتوقع». إحنا مش هنقول أكتر من كده 🤍 📩 جرّب حصة مجانية وشوف ابنك هيقول إيه.
لو ابنك حفظ القرآن كاملًا… 🤍 إيه أول حاجة نفسك تشوفها فيه بعد الحفظ؟ إنه يقرأه بصوت جميل؟ ولا يثبت حفظه؟ ولا يكون القرآن ظاهرًا في أخلاقه وتصرفاته؟ لأن أجمل شيء في رحلة القرآن مش إن الطفل يقول: “أنا حفظت.” لكن إن اللي حواليه يقولوا: “القرآن غيّر فيه.” 📖🤍 💬 لو هتختار صفة واحدة تتمنى القرآن يزرعها في ابنك… هتختار إيه؟
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @elmoslem_elsaghir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@amrabdolaziz · 7,306#1
@itsTheQuraan · 277,248#2
@Mahmoud_Maddad · 12,586#3
@Aya_shahid · 6,324#4
@alshafi3ii · 2,216#5
@adabonofoss · 2,136#6
@dr_alkadery · 538#7
@Quraany5 · 549 (as read 21 September 2026)#8
@pardontanrim · 466#9
@fatimeat986 · 870 (as read 21 September 2026)#10
@so_alobodi · 20,003#11
@TamayyuzCenter · 113,505#12
@ganat0n · 403#13
@aqrae · 1,522#14
@amroelbosaty · 17,425#15
@mekkawy2019 · 59,300#16
@Nfayis · 7,746#17
@alqamra · 6,178#18
@university_dream · 991#19
@latifa215 · 444#20
@estelahhadeth · 5,864#21
@lotf_21 · 773#22
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 99,437#23
@ayatqurancenter · 328,621#24
@MuhammadShuqeir · 1,235 (as read 21 September 2026)#25
@fayezalkandary · 17,217#26
@ShamaeloftheProphet · 11,216#27
@darEzza · 3,017#28
@IbnMalekAr · 41,683#29
@sh_samirmostafa · 125,617#30
@elwardany · 1,314#31
@QaleelDa2em · 4,271 (as read 21 September 2026)#32
@bahyaoui · 5,399#33
@drhazemshouman · 262,766#34
@Belwhynoraby · 63,242#35
@Quran_Station · 363,033#36
@THAIR0 · 1,937#37
@Abdulrahman_AlMoshed · 8,209#38
@ahmedsalem81 · 60,573#39
@dhaalnuwn · 2,219#40
@dr_mogbel · 6,416#41
@doaasafwat · 4,690#42
@ammars1986 · 12,570#43
@allathar · 3,944#44
@takhasosyafiqhwasooloh · 3,074#45
@sh3radab · 626#46
@alsayed_ah · 517,033#47
@nassermuteb · 7,202#48
@tahriratakadia · 4,355#49
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,695#50
@Kbahaa · 23,913#51
@algoharyahmad · 39,827#52
@feelingletter · 271#53
@Qutooff · 103,803#54
@eqtebasaati · 8,635#55
@roqua_a · 9,118#56
@wafeyatdomiat · 1,061#57
@tarekh_kateba · 2,443#58
@Space_TP2016 · 290 (as read 21 September 2026)#59
@Jamal_Alsebaey · 2,462#60
@bibrahimi · 9,609#61
@alaaabobaker · 3,422 (as read 21 September 2026)#62
@safaaalahmadi · 860 (as read 21 September 2026)#63
@alrashed1440 · 614#64
@Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,170#65
@planetnews3 · 670#66
@tahaelazhre · 5,940#67
@arabicpost_me · 25,041#68
@jhelles · 88,903#69
@qenawy99 · 6,127#70
@quraanmanhaj · 1,442#71
@alqasemm · 5,230#72
@alrehlah · 6,212#73
@RaniaZanoun · 486#74
@alminasaai · 2,813#75
@menhaj_elsunna · 5,690#76
@aerfanalruooh · 38,661#77
@palscholars · 10,171#78
@HusseinAyyad · 536#79
@taghridosaimi · 9,337#80
@takween_ebooks · 3,695#81
@korawabas · 553 (as read 21 September 2026)#82
@sari_orabi · 12,886#83
@wa_youallimkom · 394#84
@ArabicTeachers4NonNativeSpeakers · 14,406#85
@SyriaDefence · 39,318#86
@CopysiorCS1 · 3,611#87
@ArabicCenterFajr · 7,991#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PR0PHETMuhammad · 65,381
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أكاديمية المسلم الصغير للتحفيظ والتربية ♥️” (@elmoslem_elsaghir), 22,304 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elmoslem_elsaghir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.