📗 عنوان کتاب: اسلامیسازی سکولاریسم 🔹 عنوان اصلی: أسلمة العلمانية 📝 نویسنده: دکتر فهد العجلان 🖊 مترجم: عبدالله شیخ آبادی 📑 تعداد صفحات: ۳۱۸ مرکز بینش سایت | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | فیسبوک

Channel
قناة د.فهد بن صالح العجلان
@fahadalajlan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,012subscribers
+619 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001193984871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fahadalajlan |
| Created | 12 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fahadalajlan |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 17,012 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:18 | 17,019 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:25 | 17,025 | +7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 17,018 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:36 | 17,015 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 17,018 | +4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 17,014 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:57 | 17,010 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 17,011 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:46 | 17,009 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 17,014 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 17,011 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 17,010 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 17,006 | +7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 16,999 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 17,003 | +5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 16,998 | +7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 16,991 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 16,995 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 16,997 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.70%
- avg views ÷ 17,012 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 460
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (26 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 460 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 21
- Videos
- 20
- Links
- 70
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
File, posted without a caption
أسعدكم الله بطاعته، ولمن أحب: هذه صفحة مصممة لمؤلفاتي المتاحة بصيغة pdf نفع الله بها، وبارك فيها.
File, posted without a caption
لمن أحب أو سأل: هذه نسخة "pdf" من كتاب: "العواصم" المقولات الضامنة من الانحرافات الفكرية المعاصرة مع الشكر لمركز آفاق المعرفة على إتاحة النسخة للنشر.
File, posted without a caption
من الضمانات المهمَّة لصيانة المسلم نفسه من الشبهات المعاصرة على السنَّة النبوية أن يعرف كيف حفظت سنَّة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم. فالملاحظ أنَّ أكثر الناس لا يعرفون كيف جمعت سنَّة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، ولهذا يسهل عليهم تقبُّل كثيرٍ من الشبهات الساذجة التي تشيع في عصرنا. فلا تعجب حينها من ترداد شبهات سطحية شائعة، كالقول بأنَّ المحدثين اعتنوا بالسند دون المتن، أو أنَّ متون الأحاديث الصحيحة تخالف العقل، أو البخاري …
https://youtu.be/kSQ3B-uEEwU?si=QhWIUnfSf95ZJxgV
رأيت تعليقًا يغلِّط فيه صاحبُه طريقة الدفاع عن بعض الأئمة والأعلام والذب عنهم مع ذكر وقوعهم في أخطاء وأغلاط لا يجوز متابعتهم عليها، ويقول ما فحواه: إنَّ الدفاع عن العلماء يجب أن يكون باتباعهم، وأنَّهم أعلم بالسنَّة، ونتبعهم في معرفة معتقد السلف، وأما منهج إعذارهم في أخطائهم فهو غرورٌ وجهلٌ. وهذا في الحقيقة مسلكٌ تائه، فليس في بيان غلط العالم، وعدم متابعته عليه ثم إعذاره أي جهلٍ أو غرور، بل هو مسلك واجبٌ، فهو اتباعٌ…
هذا الملف يحوي ما يلي: * من كتاب «زخرف القول.. معالجة لأبرز المقولات المؤسسة للانحراف الفكري المعاصر»: ١- مقولة «الغلو نبتة سلفية» * من كتاب «معركة النص.. مع التحريف المعاصر للأحكام والمفاهيم الشرعية»: ١- السلفية.. منهج أم جماعة؟ ٢- الغلو في التكفير واستباحة الدماء «ظاهرة الأصول الشرعية المتعطِّلة». ٣- جناية الغلاة على تحكيم الشريعة.
https://atharah.net/قصة-الفتنة
روى ابن الجنيد عبارة مؤثرة عن الإمام الشهير يحيى بن معين، يقول فيها: (إنا لنطعن على أقوامٍ، لعلَّهم قد حطُّوا رحالهم في الجنَّة منذ أكثر من مائتي سنة). وهي عبارة موجعة لقلوب المتقين من علماء السلف، ولهذا قال ابن مهرويه راوي هذه العبارة: (فدخلتُ على عبد الرحمن بن أبي حاتم وهو يقرأ على الناس كتاب الجرح والتعديل، فحدثتُه بهذه الحكاية فبكى، وارتعدت يداه، حتى سقط الكتاب من يده، وجعل يبكي، ويستعيدني الحكاية، ولم يقرأ في …
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @fahadalajlan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @fahadalajlan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 15 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Khatmat_Tafsir_AlQuran · 4774 postsالعقيدة و دراسة الأديان
@xthelight · 7764 postsقرآن
@Quran_Tarjama_Farsi · 203 postsTHE QURAN
@The_Quran_English_Translation · 5493 postsقناة | فيصل بن تركي
@IFaisal_Turki · 14,3402 postsالمدربة مريم الهاجري
@Malhajri_2 · 2202 postsأبو عمر || سامر إيبش
@aboomarsamer1 · 40,5012 posts¦¦ لطيف الكلام ¦¦
@alrehlah · 6,2252 postsأقباسُ أسمارٍ (صالح بن عبد الحكيم)
@aqb_as · 8952 postsقناة مشاري بن سعد الشثري
@m_alshathri · 17,4662 postsقناة | مِهاد الأصول
@mihad_osol · 19,7612 postsقَيد
@qa1id · 6132 postsقناة أبي عبد الرحمن عادل بن أحمد
@shrohat_adel · 5972 postsقناة د/ سلطان العميري
@sutanalomairi · 38,0662 postsعبدالله العيسى
@ABDULLAHALISSA_H4 · 3921 postالْحِلْيَة
@AL7ELYA · 1,2791 postرَقم السَّوانح
@Alsawaneh · 8641 postقناة : ارجو طيب الأثر..
@Athara1234 · 281 postفوائد وشوارد
@FiqhNawazil · 1,0721 postمركز إصلاح وتأهيل الحدادية والغلاة
@Haddadynews · 1,8821 postقناة د. حسن سلمان
@Hassansalaman · 1,0701 postالموسوعة القرآنية
@QuranPediaApp · 29,5271 postعبدالله الوهيبي
@aalwhebey · 26,9351 postقناة مُحمد شُميس
@alfawayid99 · 35,0831 postأبو معاذ الحموي 📜
@alhamaoy · 7491 postمهتم!
@iMOHTM · 7861 post⠀ོمن كل بستان
@mutarjimat · 4,9021 postنور الإسلام لتبديد الظلام
@nrislamvsdalam · 781 postسنا | قضايا المرأة
@sana_women · 2,2811 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ktbtakween · 21,805
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
@turaath_ah · 33,488
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@masarchannel · 22,502
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@mohamedebrahim1431995 · 77,771
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 August 2026
@OTCcourse · 63,109
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@eexx_2030 · 80,108
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة د.فهد بن صالح العجلان” (@fahadalajlan), 17,012 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fahadalajlan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.