Channel
@m_alshathri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,481subscribers
+231 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001009351721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m_alshathri |
| Created | 27 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m_alshathri |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:15 | 17,481 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 17,482 | +6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:38 | 17,476 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:35 | 17,480 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 17,485 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 17,487 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 17,489 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 17,495 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 17,494 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 17,490 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 17,489 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 17,488 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 17,485 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 17,489 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 17,483 | +7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 17,476 | +22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 17,454 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 17,453 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 17,451 | -2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 17,453 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (3 April 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 43,540 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
كان نبينا ﷺ بالمؤمنين رحيما، وعليهم مشفقا، ولهم ناصحا .. وكان من نصحه وشفقته بأمته تجريدُه التوحيدَ لله رب العالمين، علمًا وعملًا ودعوةً، وكان من أخصّ مَن شملهم نصحُه وشفقتُه: قرابته وأهل بيته، فنصحهم وأنذرهم كما أمره ربه بما أمره به ربه. فقال لابن عباس -رضي الله عنه وعن أبيه- ابنِ عمّه ومن دعا له بالفقه في الدين والعلم بالتأويل: «إني أعلمك كلمات، إذا سألتَ فاسأل الله، وإذا استعنتَ فاستعن بالله». وقال لابنته سيدةِ…
«ومن أتى حدِّثْ ولو لم تنصلحْ نيَّتُهُ فإنّها سوف تصحّْ فقد روينا عن كبارٍ جِلَّهْ: أبى علينا العلمُ إلا للهْ» السيوطي
«حلال المشكلات فضيلة مولانا الشيخ محمد حسنين مخلوف العدوي»
كتب العلامة محيي الدين عبد الحميد آخر تحقيقه لشرح شذور الذهب: (أسأل الله أن يجعله خالصًا لوجهه، وأن يثيبني عليه بمقدار ما عانيتُ فيه والناسُ نيام). رحمه الله ورضي عنه وجزاه عن العلم وطلبته بخير ما جزى به العاملين لدينه والناشرين لعلوم شريعته
Photo, posted without a caption
أول تجربة لي في صناعة مقطع تعليمي عبر الكلود، استعنت بها في شرح مواقيت الصلاة لطلابي .. لم يتطلب مني إنجازها كبيرَ جهد، وقد كانت تبذل في مثل ذلك الأوقات والأموال، فالحمد لله على تيسيره عسى أن تكون تجربة نافعة 😃
لا شك أن أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي فتحٌ من الله، والاستعانة بها -بحثًا وتعليمًا ومدارسةً- من تمام العقل .. لكن هذا شيء، وتشبّع المرء من خلالها بما لم يُعْطَ شيءٌ آخر، فهي أدواتٌ للتتبُّع وليست مسالكَ للتشبُّع. ولا حرجَ على الباحث أن يطلب منها كتابةَ آلاف الصفحات لينتفع بقراءتها والبناء على مادتها وتخليق أفكار من استقراءاتها وإحصاءاتها، شأنه في ذلك شأن من يطالع المصادر والموسوعات ليقوّم فكره ويدعّم بحثه، لكن أن ينشئَ …
File, posted without a caption
لمن أحب أو سأل: هذه نسخة "pdf" من كتاب: "العواصم" المقولات الضامنة من الانحرافات الفكرية المعاصرة مع الشكر لمركز آفاق المعرفة على إتاحة النسخة للنشر.
«كان ابن عباس إذا فسّر الشيءَ رأيتَ عليه نورًا» مجاهد
صنف أبو سعيد السيرافي كتاب الإقناع في النحو، ولم يتمّه، فأتمّه ولده يوسف وقال: «وضع والدي النحوَ في المزابل بالإقناع». قال ياقوت: «يعني أنه سهّله جدا فلا يحتاج إلى مفسِّر». وشرح تلميذه أبو الحسن علي بن عيسى كتاب سيبويه «إلا أنه غسله، وذاك أن أحد بني رضوان التاجر نازعه في مسألةٍ، فقام مغضبًا، وأخذ شرح سيبويه وجعله في إجّانةٍ وصبَّ عليه الماء وغسله، وجعل يلطم به الحيطان ويقول: لا أجعل أولاد البقالين نحاة».
"لا يُؤيِسْكَ من الخير ما مضى من التفريط، فإنه قد انتبه خلقٌ كثيرٌ بعد الرقاد الطويل" ابن الجوزي
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @m_alshathri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة مشاري بن سعد الشثري” (@m_alshathri), 17,481 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_alshathri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.