Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for emberthought

Channel

emberthought

@EmberThought

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-1,282 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001920497293
TypeChannel
Username@EmberThought
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EmberThought

Growth

21,329665.57 August 2026 — 1,284 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,285 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,283 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,308 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,312 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,310 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,329 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -1,282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 22:382-1,327
29 Aug 2026, 01:081,329+19
25 Aug 2026, 20:221,310-5
23 Aug 2026, 06:141,315+3
19 Aug 2026, 18:261,312+4
16 Aug 2026, 21:421,308+20
13 Aug 2026, 10:381,288+5
10 Aug 2026, 19:581,283-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:531,285+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:321,284first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026

أثمّة من يباحثني في المنطق الأرسطيّ من نقّاده وفق المنطق الرّمزيّ؟ إن كان فليأتِ لمجموعتي: https://t.me/chatmtalh

7 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC130 viewsread 7 August 2026

لو احتج مسفسط علي بأني لا أقبل اليقين العادي بماذا أجيب؟ يعني كاليقين بالتواتر أو غيره ويسند ظهره على مايستحيل عادة كالتواطئ — عدم قبول الشّيء إنّما يتعلّق بموضوعه، فالموضوعات لما اختلفت بالشّرف والأهميّة من جملة موضوعات الغايات الّتي نسعى إليها وجدنا أنفسنا نتسمّح فيها فنقبل في هذا الظّنّ ولا نقبل في هذا الظّنّ، ونظرًا لكون يقيننا قليلًا لا لإشكال بِلَوحٍ الواقع إلّا عسرة اكتسابنا بزحام المشاغل وتكاسل الأنفس ومشقّ

5 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC233 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

"هناك أبواب لو شئنا لشرحناها، ولأسهبنا في شرحها ولكنّنا أغفلنا بعضها ليبقى للعالم ميزةً بعدي".

4 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC288 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

شرف علم البلاغة على سائر العلوم العربيّة.

4 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC299 viewsread 7 August 2026

تخيل معي فجأةً وبغتةً باشرتَ رجلًا تقول له: "والله العظيم وأقسم بالله وبربّ العزّة اسمي مؤيّد"، أفتراه يعجب منك منكرًا لِمَ كلّ هذا الجهد في الإثبات؟ فهكذا الأمر في ابتدائك الكلام في كلّ عبارةٍ: "لقد". ما أنقمه على أغلب الكتابة المعاصرة استعمالهم التّوكيد في أقلّ واردة! فتراهم يقولون في كلّ ابتداء مقال وكلام: لقد لقد لقد. و(لقد) كلمةٌ مركّبةٌ من كلمتين: (لـ)، و(قد)، وهما حرفان يفيدان التّوكيد، الأوّل لام التّوكي

4 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC303 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هذا أكثر ما فَجَأني والله في قراءته.

3 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC301 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

إبطال دعوى الإجماع على حرمة المعازف.

3 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC317 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

في إطلاقات (الأصل)، حسين محسن العاملي.

2 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC388 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

حديث سموّ سيّدي الأمير محمّد بن سلمان عن الرّوابط العميقة بين السّعوديّة والعراق.

1 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC377 viewsread 7 August 2026

هذا، ويمتنع في حدّ ذاته أن يكون رسمٌ بلا حدّ البتّة؛ إذ الرّسم معلول لما بالذّات، وما بالعرض لا يكون لشيءٍ دون ما بالذّات، فكيف وقد خصصناه بخواصّه الّتي بالذّات تستسلزم فصلًا ما لأجله كان الاختصاص العرضيّ؟ فالقول بالرّسم دون حدّه تناقضٌ لازم، وإن أنكر الرّسم، فإنّه واقعٌ فيه لا محالة.

1 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC356 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

المشكلة أنّه منع الرّسم للجزئيّ، ثمّ هو يجيز تحديده بالإشارة الّتي هي قسمٌ من أقسام الرّسم، المجيءُ بالعوارض، وهي الجزئيّات الممثّلة لما يكون بالعرض.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @EmberThought. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“emberthought” (@EmberThought), 2 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmberThought.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.