Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for House of Muses.

Channel

House of Muses.

@EnglishMuses

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,103subscribers

+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002174147939
TypeChannel
Username@EnglishMuses
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EnglishMuses

Growth

12,04412,10312,073.56 August 2026 — 12,048 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,044 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,047 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,055 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,058 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,054 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,062 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,052 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,054 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,063 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,072 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,068 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,080 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,083 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,096 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,103 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 23 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,035–12,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 14:0712,103+7
28 Aug 2026, 15:4812,096+13
27 Aug 2026, 12:1612,083+3
26 Aug 2026, 15:2412,080-4
25 Aug 2026, 16:0312,084+16
24 Aug 2026, 15:1212,068-4
22 Aug 2026, 22:5312,072-3
20 Aug 2026, 10:5312,075+19
19 Aug 2026, 10:4812,056-7
18 Aug 2026, 12:1312,063+2
17 Aug 2026, 12:4412,061+7
16 Aug 2026, 02:2612,054+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:4512,052-10
13 Aug 2026, 05:0512,062+8
12 Aug 2026, 02:4712,054-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:5712,058+3
10 Aug 2026, 00:2812,055+6
9 Aug 2026, 02:2112,049+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:3712,047+3
7 Aug 2026, 03:3312,044first reading

Engagement

484 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.08%
avg views ÷ 12,103 subscribers
Avg views / post
252
459 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
484
of 484 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 191 of 459 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held484 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total115,646
Reactions total1,779
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,779 reactions across 177 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49627.9%
😭42824.1%
🔥19911.2%
😇1297.25%
🥰1297.25%
🕊1086.07%
💯1045.85%
🎉432.42%
💘382.14%
❤‍🔥321.80%
🍓181.01%
👍170.956%
👏150.843%
80.45%
🐳80.45%
😍40.225%
😘30.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 191 of the 484 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,779reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 484 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 459 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EnglishMuses. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 484 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC275 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ Well, it appears the evening has reached its natural conclusion before I had quite noticed. Time does have a rather unfortunate habit of departing without invitation. In the meantime, I would kindly invite you to pay a visit to our good companions: @GepengFess, @ENGRPbase, and @ENGnsfworld. I would also encourage you to keep @EyeOnPalestine2 and @Qudsnen within your view. ㅤㅤㅤ For those inclined to wander a littl

😭8🕊43

28 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC260 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

I’ve had enough fun for today’s FUNishment.

😭11

28 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC316 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#KissAHomie. Salutations. A Phainon doppelgänger here. I’ve been feeling a little lonely lately, so I suppose now would be a rather lovely time to meet some new people and perhaps find a few with whom I can share a little extra affection A.K.A Friend-With-Affection. A little about me: I’m quite the yapper. Give me something I’m passionate about and I can easily send 1–4 BBCs without even noticing. I’m also rather fon

28 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC298 viewsread 29 August 2026

#homiesTMI the urge to delete your account because you embarrassing yourself by accidentally pressed calls to someone's profile while you're stalking them. 😨

28 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC290 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#HomiesTMI. Okay, let's stop chasing exes. Because she herself told me that she truly loves someone else, and she doesn't want me anymore. 🙂

🕊3

28 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC305 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

If you're still so sleep deprived despite resting in your own room, why don't you try mine instead, @SleepDeprivedGod?

❤‍🔥9

28 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC329 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#SeekHomies ; Warm wishes to you all, I’m currently seeking new people to be friends with. I’m also looking for a family too like sisters, brothers, also children. Moonlight falls with quite grace, if you’re interested do leave some trace❣️

Showing the 12 most recent of 484 posts we hold for @EnglishMuses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 225,626 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“House of Muses.” (@EnglishMuses), 12,103 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnglishMuses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.