Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Gepengfess! 💌
@gepengfess
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,726subscribers
-338 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001174169346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gepengfess |
| Description | A base for gepengers to send your thoughts or ask about stuffs! Please read the pinned for the rules we use in this base. Send your menfess: 👀 ・Inquiries, critiques & suggestions: @ GepengfessRobot ・Twibbon: @ MametchiTheBot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gepengfess |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:16 | 17,726 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:00 | 17,737 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:05 | 17,744 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 17,748 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:58 | 17,754 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 17,747 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:20 | 17,765 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 17,764 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:09 | 17,773 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 17,785 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 17,786 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:46 | 17,782 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 17,775 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 17,780 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 17,783 | -15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:31 | 17,798 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 17,812 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 17,817 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 17,821 | +10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 17,811 | first reading |
Engagement
353 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.79%
- avg views ÷ 17,726 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 317
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 353 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 353 (23 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,733 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈89,800
- Videos
- ≈9,630
- Links
- ≈12,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 50s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Thank you for today! 🤍
The call of the night awaits my presence, for it marks the very beginning of my journey. Much gratitude for accompanying me today, until then, check out our dearly partner: @EnglishMuses & @CoastFess— see where we are after the curtains are closed: @gepengers. Will we meet again when the moon and the stars allow us to?
Channel name was changed to «Gepengfess! 💌»
#cupeng peng, is it okay tiba tiba lost feeling padahal udah deket bgt (belum ad hubungan) karna dighosting sama dianya? Soalnya sender jujur ngerasa lost feeling karna dia tiba tiba ngilang tanpa kabar gitu..😔😔
#BantuGepeng hi! Could anyone help me with some OC concept ideas? Maybe jobs, backgrounds, personalities, or anything interesting. I’ve been wanting to make a new plot lately, but my mind is completely blank rn 😭 I’d really appreciate any ideas you have. Thank you so much ♥️
#BantuGepeng. Ummm pengiee, is it okay to use ALNST muse rn? Sender mau pakai Ivan cuman masih ragu.
#BantuGepeng heeyya!!! i'm quite mmmm museless rn.. sooo can you suggest me a female muse that you wish to seee the most? from anywhere would be fine by me!!! thank you!
#BantuGepeng. I've been thinking about this for a while and I've now settled on three suitable candidates for roleplay muse in the form of my original plot. This is a small description of the plots available to them; (1) Alhaitham, is a librarian who will later be confronted by many stories from library books, which suddenly come to life and take him in to solve some keys. (2), Anaxa, is a mad-scientist who is obsess…
#cupeng. not the same sender (izin jbjb) but why should we settle down with trying to take the hint if we're in a relationship in the first place? i mean, isn't the whole point of it is to communicate with your partner? kalau emang bosen atau ada apa2 harusnya komunikasi nya jalanin dong.. i'm sorry but masa sekedar ngabarin ngga sampe 5 menit aja susaaah banget padahal di awal punya waktu online lama? :/
#BantuGepeng better sender stay kiki wee or move to shu iwai silent hill f ya peng?
#BantuGepeng peng, saranin muse m yang talkactive + kindof flirty dong :3
Showing the 12 most recent of 353 posts we hold for @gepengfess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Mau apa malem ini?
- Menfess biasa.50%
- Sesi khusus malming.50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 353 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@gepengers · 1,0518 postsHappy birthday, Shikanoin Heizou!
@AFawnSleuth · 11 post#AcidOnMina⋆˚࿔
@AcidOnMina · 31 postDearest, Solivan.
@Brugmanssia · 11 postCOAST FESS
@CoastFess · 4,0561 post#XIAFEIJUBILEE!
@XiafeiJubilee · 11 post𝓢huriful—Day!💗
@shurifulday · 21 postᥕᥱі wᥙ𝗑іᥲᥒ birthday — !
@weiwuxianbirthday · 21 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kemarahan · 56,767
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 26 August 2026
@HokaBase · 119,142
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 26 August 2026
@OnTopTM · 441,758
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gepengfess! 💌” (@gepengfess), 17,726 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gepengfess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.