Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -3,583. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 633,181–639,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 13:14
633,864
-182
4 Nov 2026, 10:26
634,046
-32
3 Nov 2026, 08:19
634,078
+31
2 Nov 2026, 11:48
634,047
+40
1 Nov 2026, 12:41
634,007
-134
31 Oct 2026, 12:17
634,141
-248
30 Oct 2026, 09:45
634,389
-201
29 Oct 2026, 13:09
634,590
-215
28 Oct 2026, 13:51
634,805
-280
27 Oct 2026, 10:19
635,085
-134
26 Oct 2026, 08:18
635,219
-48
25 Oct 2026, 06:01
635,267
-36
24 Oct 2026, 05:37
635,303
-141
23 Oct 2026, 07:26
635,444
-184
22 Oct 2026, 09:39
635,628
-226
21 Oct 2026, 03:00
635,854
-227
20 Oct 2026, 00:16
636,081
-162
19 Oct 2026, 01:35
636,243
-105
18 Oct 2026, 03:20
636,348
-233
17 Oct 2026, 00:18
636,581
first reading
Engagement
667 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.69%
avg views ÷ 633,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
238 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.133%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 667 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 232 of 238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
667 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
2,548,856
Reactions total
3,370
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,390
Videos
≈89
Links
≈12,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
10,525 reactions across 653 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,543
90.7%
👍
454
4.31%
🔥
143
1.36%
🥰
133
1.26%
👏
65
0.618%
🙏
33
0.314%
😁
31
0.295%
👎
26
0.247%
👌
14
0.133%
🤡
13
0.124%
🐳
11
0.105%
🕊
10
0.095%
😱
9
0.086%
🤣
9
0.086%
🤔
8
0.076%
🤯
8
0.076%
❤🔥
5
0.048%
💯
5
0.048%
🎉
3
0.029%
😍
2
0.019%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 654 of the 667 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 667 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 238 posts held from the last 30 days (1.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Live SSC CGL Mains Practice Batch (Maths) is HERE!! 🔥
🚀Concept Clarity, Advanced Coverage, Exam Based Practice
❌ ₹999 ➝ ✅ Just ₹199
https://uclive.org/new-courses/95-mains-practice-batch-maths-2026
Maths Crash Course is HERE!!🔥
🚀 Master the FULL Maths Course
💥 Limited Offer – Start Your ZERO to INFINITY Journey NOW!
❌ ₹999 ➝ ✅ Just ₹249
https://uclive.org/new-courses/86
Recorded Maths Batches Are HERE!
Alpha 1.0 (…
Recent Exams में पूछे गए New Pattern Spotting Errors | SSC CHSL & CPO 2026 | Rani Ma'am is live now.... Link. https://www.youtube.com/live/PO7zsUxDgmU?si=DzPz9SMgdKIrAOHX
Live SSC CGL Mains Practice Batch (Maths) is HERE!! 🔥
🚀Concept Clarity, Advanced Coverage, Exam Based Practice
❌ ₹999 ➝ ✅ Just ₹199
https://uclive.org/new-courses/95-mains-practice-batch-maths-2026
Maths Crash Course is HERE!!🔥
🚀 Master the FULL Maths Course
💥 Limited Offer – Start Your ZERO to INFINITY Journey NOW!
❌ ₹999 ➝ ✅ Just ₹249
https://uclive.org/new-courses/86
Recorded Maths Batches Are HERE!
Alpha 1.0 (…
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 667 posts we hold for @Englishwithranimaam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Englishwithranimaam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 6 most recent of 51 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
A six digit number is divisible by 33. If 54 is added to the number, then the new number formed will also be divisible by:
छह अंकों की एक संख्या 33 से विभाजित है। यदि संख्या में 54 जोड़ा जाता है, तो बनने वाली नई संख्या भी इससे विभाज्य होगी:
354%
216%
513%
717%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If the selling price of an article is doubled, then the profit becomes 4 times. What was the original profit percentage?
यदि एक वस्तु का विक्रय मूल्य दोगुना हो जाता है, तो लाभ 4 गुना हो जाता है। वास्तविक लाभ प्रतिशत क्या था?
75%16%
100%32%
50%31%
25%21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
6 labourers can finish a work in 16 days. 10 labourers are available, but the work is to be finished in 8 days. How many more labourers are to be called to finish the work in time?
253%
012%
422%
113%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The simple interest on a certain sum at the rate of 12.5% per annum for 6 years is Rs. 13,500 less than the principal. Find the simple interest.
Rs. 13,50017%
Rs. 54,00033%
Rs. 40,00018%
Rs. 40,50032%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 667 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Englishwithranimaam named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dopt_india named in 2 posts, 7 October 2026 – 8 October 2026
@pmoindia named in 2 posts, 7 October 2026 – 8 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
English With Rani Ma'am {UC Live} @English_By_With_Rani_Maam_Mam · 19,298 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 30 September 2026
UC LIVE @uclive_ranimam · 20,223 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 September 2026
English with Rani Ma'am @Rani_Mam_English_2025 · 23,050 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 September 2026
English Madhyam @EnglishMadhyam · 453,655 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
SSC CRACKERS @ssccrackersofficialpage · 63,672 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
StudyIQ PCS @PCSSaarthi · 80,886 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Parcham Classes @PARCHAMCLASSES06 · 326,846 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
SSC QUIZ GROUP (PARMAR SSC) @sscquizparmar · 551,411 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 August 2026
RaMo Sir - Maths “ डरना नही करना है “ @RaMoSirOfficial · 63,083 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
EK DUM BASIC @ekdumbasic · 27,460 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
Pinnacle Publications official @ssccglpinnacleonline · 41,090 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
Abhinay Maths Pdfs & Notes SSC CGL Exams @abhinaymathspdfs · 110,996 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Tarun Grover English @tarungroverenglish · 251,755 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Maths With Pawan Rao Quiz @mathswithpawanraoquizofficial · 19,378 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
NEON CLASSES @neonclasses · 119,159 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
PARMAR SSC @parmar_ssc · 1,373,381 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Maths by Abhinav Rajput @mathsbyabhinavrajput · 62,455 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
Suman Mam English @sumanenglish · 109,179 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Abhinay maths @abhinaymaths · 453,290 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
English MCQQ @ENG_MCQQ · 41,526 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
SelectionWay Railway Exam @SelectionWayRailway2026 · 85,230 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
Gv Kaksha @gvwitmover · 110,221 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Abhas Saini Maths - Official Channel @Verbalmath · 130,019 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
Piyush Varshney Sir Reasoning @piyushvarshneyreasoningsir · 339,224 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 163 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English With Rani Ma'am(UC LIVE)” (@Englishwithranimaam), 633,864 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Englishwithranimaam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.