Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net +7,907. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,080–147,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Oct 2026, 14:59
146,173
+84
13 Oct 2026, 06:07
146,089
+398
8 Oct 2026, 22:16
145,691
+1,073
4 Oct 2026, 13:57
144,618
+1,413
26 Sept 2026, 06:01
143,205
+674
19 Sept 2026, 07:56
142,531
+187
16 Sept 2026, 23:58
142,344
+198
15 Sept 2026, 03:40
142,146
+325
13 Sept 2026, 11:16
141,821
+191
11 Sept 2026, 12:38
141,630
+267
8 Sept 2026, 23:35
141,363
+210
5 Sept 2026, 19:16
141,153
+233
3 Sept 2026, 17:20
140,920
+96
2 Sept 2026, 11:04
140,824
+109
1 Sept 2026, 09:33
140,715
+69
31 Aug 2026, 09:06
140,646
+80
30 Aug 2026, 06:05
140,566
+78
29 Aug 2026, 04:35
140,488
+4
28 Aug 2026, 06:03
140,484
+111
27 Aug 2026, 05:47
140,373
first reading
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 146,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,200
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.318%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
162 (20 July 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
1,839,000
Reactions total
5,839
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Oct 2026, 13:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15,752 reactions across 133 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
5,361
34.0%
❤🔥
5,222
33.2%
🫡
2,397
15.2%
🏆
1,152
7.31%
👏
760
4.82%
🎉
667
4.23%
⚡
193
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/WKUbVoOFm4I?si=B9AEVNkxFKakbP9k
IMR Batch now with Book - https://www.mathsmaniassc.com/new-courses/56-intense-maths-revision-batch-book
IMR BOOK link - https://www.mathsmaniassc.com/books/2-intense-maths-revision-notes
Discount for IMR Existing Users on BOOK
Use Code - OLD50
One small achievement I really wanted to share with you all. ❤️
Today, we had the official puja of our very own Maths Mania office. 🙏✨
It’s an emotional feeling to see something you once dreamed of slowly becoming real. A small step forward, but a very special one.
Grateful for how far we’ve come, and excited for everything that’s yet to come. ❤️🧿
जय माता दी 🙏
Maths Mania SSC pinned «SSC Selection Post (Phase-14) 2026 Answer Key Out:- Check Your Answer Key Now! 🔍 Visit the official SSC website: https://ssc.gov.in If you want to challenge any question or verify an answer, feel free to WhatsApp me at 9315589583. @mathsmaniassc ❤️»
SSC Selection Post (Phase-14) 2026 Answer Key Out:-
Check Your Answer Key Now! 🔍
Visit the official SSC website: https://ssc.gov.in
If you want to challenge any question or verify an answer, feel free to WhatsApp me at 9315589583.
@mathsmaniassc ❤️
Email your samples at [email protected]
Important: AI-generated samples will not be entertained.
Please share genuine handwritten Maths notes created on an iPad or Android tablet as your work samples.
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @mathsmaniaSSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MATHS MANIA QUIZ @quizbymathsmania · 54,560 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026
Maths by Abhishek ojha sir @mathsbyabhishekojha112 · 99,199 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
Dk agrawal @dkagrawal0 · 23,006 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 19 September 2026
EK DUM BASIC @ekdumbasic · 27,740 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
Bihar Yoddha @biharyoddha · 34,083 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
Himanshu Gautam CGL @HimanshuGautamCGL · 83,172 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
SSC PANACEA - Official Channel @SscPanacea · 43,007 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
THE PUNDITS 😎 - OFFICIAL : SSC Exams @ThePundits_Official · 419,927 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Tarun Grover English @tarungroverenglish · 253,523 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
SSC PYQ ENGLISHgs @SSC_PYQ_ENGLISH · 25,574 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 September 2026
Mr True Tales @mrtruetales · 32,048 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
SSC Exam Updates - Official @SSC_EXAMS_UPDATES · 108,029 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
Open Study गुरुकुल @open_study · 31,169 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Diligent SSCian Monika Poonia @DiligentSSCian · 137,259 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
DUMRAON TV @Dumraontv · 125,940 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
⚜️ SSC4EVER ⚜️ @ssc4ever · 36,889 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
GS Catalyst @truementor100 · 46,945 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 August 2026
English With Rani Ma'am(UC LIVE) @Englishwithranimaam · 637,011 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
PARMAR SSC @parmar_ssc · 1,361,554 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
SSC QUIZ GROUP (PARMAR SSC) @sscquizparmar · 546,227 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 August 2026
Maths by Abhinav Rajput @mathsbyabhinavrajput · 62,730 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
1EQ @One_EQ · 43,530 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
SSC CGL Tricky Vocab @SSC_CGL_Tricky_Vocab · 51,215 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 August 2026
Maths by Sahil Sir @sahilmaths · 494,487 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maths Mania SSC” (@mathsmaniaSSC), 146,173 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mathsmaniaSSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.