Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 黎叔_市场信号群

Channel

黎叔_市场信号群

@Entry_Exit_Signal

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

597subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001619272228
TypeChannel
Username@Entry_Exit_Signal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Entry_Exit_Signal

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5976096037 August 2026 — 609 subscribers7 August 2026 — 609 subscribers14 August 2026 — 605 subscribers22 August 2026 — 601 subscribers28 August 2026 — 599 subscribers4 September 2026 — 600 subscribers12 September 2026 — 597 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 595–611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:20597-3
4 Sept 2026, 16:01600+1
28 Aug 2026, 19:36599-2
22 Aug 2026, 06:47601-4
14 Aug 2026, 07:25605-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:04609no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:48609first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍466.7%
233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

进入今年海外旅行窗口,市场的信息分享将做一个调整,专注小波段走势和拐点的分享,以及有重大市场消息或机会的时候再分享本人对市场的独有看法和操作要点,一方面做一些侧重生活的享受,另一方面也可以打击盗用我这头像和名字冒充我的到处招摇撞骗假的李逵,让他们露出自己的原形,让更多尊重知识产权的群友识别真伪。何时回来呢?大约在冬季,但是,只要旅途网络可行,我们随时都会在这里见面,接下来八月份市场的走势,将更加动荡,整体美股大市场会有一波冲高,但是这是一个减仓的机会,如果你的仓位比较较重的话。而比特币将在60,000和65,000之间震荡,市场缺乏资金,这些资金都跑到一些热门美股去了,一旦再破60,000,很容易来到50,000以下,大概48000左右到45000;操作的大方向,短线中在反弹中寻找做空的机会,如果你要是没有持有比特币,60,000点或者以下这个地方,你是可以建一个小仓位的作为长线持有,如果你在70,000点以上持有比特币的,要根

1👍1

28 Jul 2026, 01:52 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

比特币未来一周将有重大方向调整,总体偏熊,本周二将出炉消费者信心指数,将判断通货膨胀的程度及走向;本周三新任美联储主席Warsh有关利率的讲话将引导市场走向;接下来美股七巨头的其他几个重磅财报出炉,也将是市场的催化剂,个人判断,操作上逢高做空是我关注的策略,目前比特币63255,这里或许有小反弹,我们拭目以待

23 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

进入美股财报季节,市场大幅波动,昨天开始七巨头开始进入财报,特斯拉和谷歌财报出来暴雷,带领市场大跌,比特币现在64980,注意这个点位可能止跌反弹,仅供参考

22 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

粉丝福利,撸个羊毛,不撸白不撸!抓紧搞他一个!😁👍

22 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

Bybit 最新空投合約價值1000U,新註冊入金100金客戶都可以參與,可以在頁面領取空投合約。 https://www.bybit.com/zh-TW/promo/campaign/MAQ3PositionAirdropCampaign/?affiliate_id=25282

16 Jul 2026, 23:38 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysisPhoto

有在上方做空的,目前这个点位或者以部分收割盈利

16 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC94 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

比特币现在63777,本周最后一次进场做多的机会在63500以下寻找,仅供参考

13 Jul 2026, 02:05 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

新的一周开始,比特币现在63480,本周操作方向,大致为反弹中寻找做空的机会,同时,每股存储股开始走低,带动大盘转向?给他几天时确认方向?待续。

1👍1

8 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysisPhoto

比特币现在62038,这里或者以下要部分收割盈利,市场继续震荡中下行,很快迎来转折点,拭目以待,以上仅供参考

7 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysis

比特币周一在比特币大佬Michael Salor 卖出比特币2.16亿美元后大跌3000点,美国总统答记者问时说自己是加密货币的拥护者crypto guy,市场随即大涨了3400点形成过山车走势,最高来到64700,目前63300,反弹后,可能出现一个做空的机会,我们拭目以待仅供参考

👍2

6 Jul 2026, 00:37 UTC109 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysisPhoto

比特币在美国250年国庆这两天继续往上走,现在63432,走势仍将震荡走高,但是随时有转向较大的可能:下周一开盘,美股可能冲高折反,AI股和芯片股有可能领跌,密切注意观察,这是过去一周比特币深跌反弹,做的两个交易

1 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC145 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_technical_anlysisPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Entry_Exit_Signal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,412
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“黎叔_市场信号群” (@Entry_Exit_Signal), 597 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Entry_Exit_Signal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.