Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +628. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,690–40,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:58
40,412
+16
15 Sept 2026, 13:40
40,396
+11
13 Sept 2026, 23:16
40,385
+25
12 Sept 2026, 06:17
40,360
+2
10 Sept 2026, 00:57
40,358
+42
6 Sept 2026, 17:15
40,316
+40
4 Sept 2026, 04:38
40,276
+16
2 Sept 2026, 19:49
40,260
+16
1 Sept 2026, 15:06
40,244
-6
31 Aug 2026, 17:07
40,250
+35
30 Aug 2026, 14:03
40,215
+8
29 Aug 2026, 12:05
40,207
+9
28 Aug 2026, 14:24
40,198
+8
27 Aug 2026, 13:34
40,190
+30
26 Aug 2026, 10:56
40,160
+49
25 Aug 2026, 11:33
40,111
+34
24 Aug 2026, 09:37
40,077
+8
22 Aug 2026, 14:18
40,069
+38
21 Aug 2026, 04:58
40,031
+14
20 Aug 2026, 05:21
40,017
first reading
Engagement
106 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 40,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,640
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.677%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 106 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
106 (31 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
398,110
Reactions total
2,696
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,850
Videos
≈10
Links
≈785
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,497 reactions across 106 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,618
58.2%
👍
1,221
27.2%
🤩
327
7.27%
🔥
178
3.96%
😍
153
3.40%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @bitebishuqin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
三马哥币圈分析（币安或油管确认） @sanmage · 30,951 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
比特币飞扬公开频道 @feiyangkanbi · 23,581 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
金色财经新闻频道 @jinse2017 · 22,784 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀 @btcyouliang · 28,837 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
BlockBeats @theblockbeats · 37,492 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
大宇投资频道 @BTCdayu2 · 30,094 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币｜DeFi ｜Web3 @telonews_cn · 83,700 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Btok News @BtokMedia · 288,827 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
以太坊币圈行情分析频道 @btc18688 · 25,268 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
Toncoin 中文频道 @toncoin_cn · 141,084 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
欧易OKX公告 @OKXAnnouncements_CN · 44,940 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news) @fenchacaij · 255,096 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
币安公告 @binance_cn · 34,158 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时 @jinseBTC · 23,761 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
金色财经 @jinsecaijinpingdao · 239,544 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道 @ChannelPANews · 24,042 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
金十数据 闪电资讯 @jin10light · 25,121 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞 @blocktemponews · 39,179 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)” (@bitebishuqin), 40,412 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitebishuqin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
