Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 牛犁的交易頻道

Channel

牛犁的交易頻道

@POPIGOGO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,805subscribers

+260 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773756175
TypeChannel
Username@POPIGOGO
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/POPIGOGO

Growth

12,53612,80512,670.57 August 2026 — 12,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,556 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,562 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,571 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,599 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,544 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,546 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,590 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,597 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,624 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,655 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,681 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,723 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,738 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,754 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,764 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,751 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,763 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,775 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,736 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,757 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,765 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,805 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +260. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,496–12,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 05:0112,805+40
5 Sept 2026, 21:3912,765+8
3 Sept 2026, 18:4012,757+21
2 Sept 2026, 12:0512,736-39
1 Sept 2026, 10:0412,775+12
31 Aug 2026, 10:4512,763+12
30 Aug 2026, 13:1512,751-7
29 Aug 2026, 15:0412,758-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:3412,764+10
27 Aug 2026, 15:1112,754+3
26 Aug 2026, 15:1312,751+13
25 Aug 2026, 17:2212,738+15
24 Aug 2026, 17:4412,723+42
23 Aug 2026, 05:3612,681+26
21 Aug 2026, 14:3712,655+31
20 Aug 2026, 14:0512,624+27
19 Aug 2026, 15:4312,597+7
18 Aug 2026, 13:3912,590+15
17 Aug 2026, 16:3912,575+29
16 Aug 2026, 14:2812,546first reading

Engagement

269 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 12,805 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
232 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
232
of 269 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 217 of 232 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held269 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total311,450
Reactions total2,382
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,798 reactions across 247 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,01171.9%
❤‍🔥2187.79%
👍1535.47%
🥰762.72%
😁562.00%
🔥491.75%
😱291.04%
👌250.893%
👻200.715%
😭160.572%
😢150.536%
😍130.465%
🤣120.429%
🫡120.429%
💋110.393%
🤓110.393%
👏100.357%
🤯90.322%
💔80.286%
70.25%
14 further kinds371.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 250 of the 269 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,798 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
250
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 269 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
200
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @POPIGOGO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 269 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC974 viewsread 2 September 2026

多整理幾天如果不錯的話 這黃線位置會有所調整

2 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,020 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

不錯 2出現了 挺好的 晚上就出現了 條件1:漲過黃線 條件2:4H收線在上方 不要著急喔 搞不好又下去一次呢? 按照條件開單會比較好喔

👍11

2 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,260 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

條件成立很重要嘿 不要亂玩

3🤣2

2 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,280 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

這裡可以試試看 如果吃損了 就等2 條件1:漲過黃線 條件2:4H收過黃線 止損我是覺得拉到這裡會安全一點 但盈虧比會比較難看就是了

11❤‍🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,270 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ETH 一般來說 這裡有兩個可能的多單機會 1跟2都可以 2的勝率會高一點 但不確定會不會出現 你如果是追求穩一點的 可以等他走2跌破後的假跌破結構 至於要不要交易 是個人選擇 不過1這個機會我覺得你們應該會喜歡 畢竟踏空了 難得看到可能有利可圖的單 我等等幫你們放上來

18

2 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

該死,剛才有人用 MetaWin 昨天送出的 25 萬美元,贏得了 12 萬美元 他們剛宣布 1,000 美元免費贈金活動又回來了 凡是在 metawin.com 存款時使用代碼 X100 的用戶 首次存款金額將翻倍,最高可達 1,000 美元 趁活動還進行中趕快去把握這個機會吧,MetaWin 的規模正與日俱增 一旦他們成為最大的加密貨幣賭場,就不會像這樣每天都送錢了

1

2 Sept 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,030 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ETH這裡走了一個小下楔 通常是一個築底跟續能的現象

❤‍🔥11😐6

2 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

笑死 戰隊可以進囉 這次先讓牛媽媽出場 https://www.ourbit.com/zh-TW/activity/cosmic-wheel-3/leaderboard?inviteCode=POPI88&tc=691114745be44aa28c25995d58c4d1f3

4

2 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,030 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

好啦 這次先讓牛媽媽出場 寰宇之輪 S3|神諭秘境正式開啟,總獎池高達 3,000,000 USDT。 輕度玩家可以抽神諭卡牌,集齊 O、U、R、B、I、T 即可參與瓜分 500,000 USDT;抽卡過程中也有機會獲得 USDT、合約體驗金、鑽石等獎勵。 合約交易玩家則可參與組隊賽,瓜分 2,500,000 USDT。冠軍戰隊最高可得 325,000 USDT,隊長最高獨享 65,000 USDT,團賽個人最高也可獲得 65,000 USDT。 活動時間:09/02 12:00 - 09/23 11:59(UTC+8) 立即參與: https://www.ourbit.com/zh-TW/activity/cosmic-wheel-3/task?inviteCode=POPI88

5❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,110 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

我把股票出清了 覺得運不好 所以把錢都丟來幣安了 拿來買牛來 狗才玩股票

14

2 Sept 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,110 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

昨天你有觀察我的FOMO的話 你會發現我又一次買底了 https://fomo.family/r/PoPi66002146

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @POPIGOGO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 39,440
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,813
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
币安公告
@binance_cn · 34,384
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Gooaye 股癌
@Gooaye · 105,927
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
林睿閎證券分析師-John
@johnstock888 · 49,633
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
記者爆料網
@reporter_Taiwan · 59,344
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 August 2026
大宇投资频道
@BTCdayu2 · 30,031
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,423
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Warrior Coin Announcements
@WarriorCoin_Ann · 329,514
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,316
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
jump.fun
@JumpDotFun · 108,497
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
abetterpath 招聘求职
@abetterpathxyz · 33,231
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
DeJob—Web3招聘求职频道📮
@DeJob_official · 46,532
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“牛犁的交易頻道” (@POPIGOGO), 12,805 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/POPIGOGO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.