多整理幾天如果不錯的話 這黃線位置會有所調整

Channel
牛犁的交易頻道
@POPIGOGO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,805subscribers
+260 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001773756175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @POPIGOGO |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/POPIGOGO |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 12,805 | +40 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 12,765 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 12,757 | +21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:05 | 12,736 | -39 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 12,775 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 12,763 | +12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 12,751 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 12,758 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 12,764 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 12,754 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 12,751 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 12,738 | +15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 12,723 | +42 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 12,681 | +26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 12,655 | +31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 12,624 | +27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 12,597 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 12,590 | +15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 12,575 | +29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 12,546 | first reading |
Engagement
269 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.5%
- avg views ÷ 12,805 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,340
- 232 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.81%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 232
- of 269 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 217 of 232 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 269 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 311,450 |
| Reactions total | 2,382 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 37s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,798 reactions across 247 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,011 | 71.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 218 | 7.79% | |
| 👍 | 153 | 5.47% | |
| 🥰 | 76 | 2.72% | |
| 😁 | 56 | 2.00% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 1.75% | |
| 😱 | 29 | 1.04% | |
| 👌 | 25 | 0.893% | |
| 👻 | 20 | 0.715% | |
| 😭 | 16 | 0.572% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 0.536% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.465% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 0.429% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 0.429% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 0.393% | |
| 🤓 | 11 | 0.393% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 0.357% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 0.322% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 0.286% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 0.25% | |
| 14 further kinds | 37 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 250 of the 269 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,798 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 250
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 44
- of 269 we hold a reading for · 16%
- Most on one post
- 200
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @POPIGOGO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 269 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
不錯 2出現了 挺好的 晚上就出現了 條件1:漲過黃線 條件2:4H收線在上方 不要著急喔 搞不好又下去一次呢? 按照條件開單會比較好喔
👍11
條件成立很重要嘿 不要亂玩
❤3🤣2
這裡可以試試看 如果吃損了 就等2 條件1:漲過黃線 條件2:4H收過黃線 止損我是覺得拉到這裡會安全一點 但盈虧比會比較難看就是了
❤11❤🔥2
ETH 一般來說 這裡有兩個可能的多單機會 1跟2都可以 2的勝率會高一點 但不確定會不會出現 你如果是追求穩一點的 可以等他走2跌破後的假跌破結構 至於要不要交易 是個人選擇 不過1這個機會我覺得你們應該會喜歡 畢竟踏空了 難得看到可能有利可圖的單 我等等幫你們放上來
❤18
該死,剛才有人用 MetaWin 昨天送出的 25 萬美元,贏得了 12 萬美元 他們剛宣布 1,000 美元免費贈金活動又回來了 凡是在 metawin.com 存款時使用代碼 X100 的用戶 首次存款金額將翻倍,最高可達 1,000 美元 趁活動還進行中趕快去把握這個機會吧,MetaWin 的規模正與日俱增 一旦他們成為最大的加密貨幣賭場,就不會像這樣每天都送錢了
❤1
ETH這裡走了一個小下楔 通常是一個築底跟續能的現象
❤🔥11😐6
笑死 戰隊可以進囉 這次先讓牛媽媽出場 https://www.ourbit.com/zh-TW/activity/cosmic-wheel-3/leaderboard?inviteCode=POPI88&tc=691114745be44aa28c25995d58c4d1f3
❤4
好啦 這次先讓牛媽媽出場 寰宇之輪 S3|神諭秘境正式開啟,總獎池高達 3,000,000 USDT。 輕度玩家可以抽神諭卡牌,集齊 O、U、R、B、I、T 即可參與瓜分 500,000 USDT;抽卡過程中也有機會獲得 USDT、合約體驗金、鑽石等獎勵。 合約交易玩家則可參與組隊賽,瓜分 2,500,000 USDT。冠軍戰隊最高可得 325,000 USDT,隊長最高獨享 65,000 USDT,團賽個人最高也可獲得 65,000 USDT。 活動時間:09/02 12:00 - 09/23 11:59(UTC+8) 立即參與: https://www.ourbit.com/zh-TW/activity/cosmic-wheel-3/task?inviteCode=POPI88
❤5❤🔥1
戰對標誌選哪個好?
我把股票出清了 覺得運不好 所以把錢都丟來幣安了 拿來買牛來 狗才玩股票
❤14
昨天你有觀察我的FOMO的話 你會發現我又一次買底了 https://fomo.family/r/PoPi66002146
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @POPIGOGO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@blocktemponews · 39,440
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@BWEnews · 72,813
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@binance_cn · 34,384
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@Gooaye · 105,927
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@johnstock888 · 49,633
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@reporter_Taiwan · 59,344
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 August 2026
@BTCdayu2 · 30,031
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@theblockbeats · 37,423
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
@WarriorCoin_Ann · 329,514
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
@bitebishuqin · 40,316
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
@JumpDotFun · 108,497
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@abetterpathxyz · 33,231
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@DeJob_official · 46,532
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“牛犁的交易頻道” (@POPIGOGO), 12,805 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/POPIGOGO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.