AV女優「變態姊姊」惠理性幻想台灣男星 曾為結婚引退 https://lai-media.net/148860

Channel
記者爆料網
@reporter_Taiwan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,551subscribers
-1,339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001428197618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reporter_Taiwan |
| Description | 官方認證藍勾勾媒體 《記者爆料網》由多位記者組成,提供民眾及同業最即時消息參考。 如要引用畫面請「標示來源出處」,讓辛苦的第一線人員擁有價值。 🔗 網站|https://new-reporter.com/ 🇹🇼中文化|https://t.me/setlanguage/taiwan 💬LINE社群|https://linktr.ee/reporter.taiwan 📣爆料投訴|https://lin.ee/34CyUcD5E 📨|[email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reporter_Taiwan |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:27 | 58,551 | -15 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 58,566 | +25 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:17 | 58,541 | +21 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:19 | 58,520 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 58,539 | -25 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:36 | 58,564 | -23 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:55 | 58,587 | -33 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 58,620 | -20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 58,640 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 58,650 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 58,651 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 58,660 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 58,674 | -33 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 58,707 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 58,727 | -25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 58,752 | -24 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 58,776 | -27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 58,803 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 58,821 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 58,833 | first reading |
Engagement
1,045 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.78%
- avg views ÷ 58,551 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,040
- 387 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.188%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 387
- of 1,045 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 131 of 387 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,045 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 404,366 |
| Reactions total | 404 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,140
- Videos
- ≈7,220
- Links
- ≈14,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 29m
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 290 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,371 reactions across 427 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 349 | 25.5% | |
| 🤡 | 152 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 94 | 6.86% | |
| 👏 | 86 | 6.27% | |
| 🖕 | 85 | 6.20% | |
| 🤮 | 69 | 5.03% | |
| 😈 | 64 | 4.67% | |
| 🤬 | 57 | 4.16% | |
| 💩 | 44 | 3.21% | |
| 🤣 | 38 | 2.77% | |
| 👎 | 35 | 2.55% | |
| 😱 | 33 | 2.41% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 2.26% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 1.82% | |
| 😭 | 20 | 1.46% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 1.31% | |
| 🙈 | 17 | 1.24% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 1.24% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 1.02% | |
| 💊 | 14 | 1.02% | |
| 24 further kinds | 109 | 7.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 501 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 387 posts held from the last 30 days (0.775%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
AV女優「變態姊姊」惠理性幻想台灣男星 曾為結婚引退 日本AV女優「變態姊姊」惠理日前來台舉辦攝影會,難得分享感情生活,透露過去曾為了結婚離開AV界,原以為能就此展開家庭生活,沒想到多年來始終未能順利懷孕,後來又因人工受孕問題與前夫意見不合,最終走上離婚一途。此外,她也大方透露近期迷上一位台灣男星,甚至將對方視為性幻想對象。
日本半夜地震!主播10分鐘內「全素顏、黑框眼鏡」上陣 https://lai-media.net/148859
日本半夜地震!主播10分鐘內「全素顏、黑框眼鏡」上陣 日本中部地區8日凌晨1時4分發生規模5.7地震,NHK長野電視台主播稻井清香再度因緊急播報受到關注。地震發生約10分鐘後,她便現身攝影棚,來不及化妝、整理頭髮,只穿著藍色高領毛衣、戴上黑框眼鏡就直接上主播台,以素顏姿態傳遞最新地震資訊。畫面曝光後,日本網友大讚她是「主播的典範」,也佩服她在深夜突發狀況下展現的專業態度。
🤩1
英勇女乘客霸氣反擊嗆退火車怪人 網友狂讚:超級帥
❤1
國道1號高雄五甲路段「衛生紙雨」!2箱貨物掉落散滿車道 駕駛遭開罰 https://lai-media.net/148852
國道深夜下起「衛生紙雨」! 國道1號高雄五甲路段,2箱衛生紙因貨物沒綁牢,直接散落車道!所幸沒有釀成事故,駕駛也因此吃上罰單,最高可罰1萬8千元。 現場畫面曝光!
目擊者想問:你怎麼不讓你自己的女兒被機車拖著跑,卻可以讓小狗被拖著跑?
🔥3
https://lai-media.net/news_view.php?new_sn=148813&new_csn=3091
https://lai-media.net/148784
行人被撞死!台中驚傳死亡車禍
🤬1
找到了!烏溪支流捕魚被溪水沖走,遺體尋獲
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,045 posts we hold for @reporter_Taiwan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@reporter_Taiwan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 October 2026
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@reporter_Taiwan named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 3 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 1 post, 3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026
named in 1 post, 3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026
named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
named in 1 post, 26 October 2026 – 26 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TaiwanAlerts · 9,286#1
@cnanewstw · 3,434#2
@bc3ts178 · 8,555#3
@tw_reporter_org · 5,073#4
@taiwanfood · 7,406#5
@technews_tw · 5,476#6
@PTS_TW_NEWS · 2,629#7
@Rush01_News · 2,916#8
@FutaGuard · 663#9
@tw_earthquake · 1,556#10
@HiNetNotify · 2,295#11
@ingressTaiwan543 · 1,829#12
@blocktemponews · 37,761#13
@Gooaye · 105,072#14
@init_engineer · 1,197#15
@abmedia_news · 18,660#16
@IngressChinese · 3,819#17
@CruelsHistoryOfFinancial · 9,803#18
@walkerland · 1,484#19
@kocpc · 7,925#20
@yipee88 · 2,635#21
@mrmadtw · 5,735#22
@grenadetw · 7,299#23
@natgeomedia · 14,855#24
@LibaoFinanceSchool · 2,853#25
@thenewslens · 5,243#26
@StockIntelligenceNews · 17,106#27
@b12nytg · 3,669#28
@cardtopia · 3,353#29
@Free_Group · 5,305#30
@memes_backup · 2,872#31
@davihuantalks · 202#32
@BingXTraderAlex66 · 14,447#33
@POPIGOGO · 14,357#34
@MAXannouncement · 994#35
@blockcastit · 12,652#36
@PTTSteamFree · 179#37
@zombitinfo · 11,068#38
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@investanchors · 19,807
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 September 2026
@Gooaye · 105,072
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“記者爆料網” (@reporter_Taiwan), 58,551 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reporter_Taiwan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.