🔥 Robinhood 迷因幣交易火熱,但用信用卡購買卻被歸為「數位商品」,引發規避 KYC 爭議,銀行已要求 Visa 審查。 - 💸 同時鏈上驚現 2,000 萬美元交易慘遇極端滑價,瞬間價值蒸發 99%,再次警示迷因幣的高風險。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/kq4eghx

Channel
區塊客 Blockcast.it-第一手 區塊鏈新聞
@blockcastit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,474subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001437144113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockcastit |
| Description | 區塊客成立於 2017 年 4 月,積極蒐羅並傳遞全球區塊鏈與加密貨幣的第一手資訊,剖析尖端新聞,專題評議關鍵話題! 👉社群交流討論群:https://bit.ly/3JDCbsi 👉Instagram:https://bit.ly/37WnrHg 👉Facebook:https://bit.ly/3GvKsPo 👉官網:https://blockcast.it/ 👉Youtube:https://bit.ly/3MubJmB |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockcastit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:13 | 12,474 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:46 | 12,485 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 12,480 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 12,478 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 12,470 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 12,476 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 12,489 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 12,487 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 12,498 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 12,505 | +17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 12,488 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 12,484 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 12,472 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 12,473 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 12,485 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 12,484 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 12,474 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 12,468 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 12,466 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 12,461 | first reading |
Engagement
176 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.71%
- avg views ÷ 12,474 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 463
- 171 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.311%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 171
- of 176 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 171 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 176 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 79,168 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,600
- Videos
- ≈49
- Links
- ≈15,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
71 reactions across 36 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 18 | 25.4% | |
| 💩 | 15 | 21.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.7% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 176 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📉 全球債市拋售與油價上漲夾擊,比特幣九月開局受挫,考驗八月建立的漲勢基礎 🏦。 - 📋 九月首兩日,比特幣累計回落逾 2.6%,從 79,200 美元高點急速回落,一度下探 76,400 美元附近。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/7rzur2r
🏦 21家金融巨頭聯手籌組新公司,計畫於 2026 下半年成立,目標 2027 上半年推出美元穩定幣,正式進軍市場。 - 🎯 新公司將以全球市場為目標,應用情境鎖定跨境支付、機構資金轉移及數位資產結算,長期計畫涵蓋歐元等其他G7貨幣。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/2u84ny8
🧐 方舟投資與 Glassnode 聯合報告,深入剖析三大公鏈的去中心化光譜。 - 🔢 報告指出,BTC 與 ETH 各只需 3 個實體即可跨越關鍵共識門檻,Solana 則需 19 個驗證者,揭示了不同網路的設計權衡。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/pw6bw3z
🚨 注意!偽裝成「Claude Opus 5 免費桌面版」的應用程式,是名為 RevStealer 的惡意程式。 - 💸 專門鎖定逾 50 款加密錢包、瀏覽器憑證與密碼,竊取資料後會自行刪除,不留痕跡。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/3krt4nm
📈 幣安帳戶也能玩美股選擇權了!首階段支援超過 1,000 檔股票與 ETF,讓用戶能直接買入買權或賣權,表達多空觀點或進行對沖。 - 🔍 該產品採實物交割,符合資格的非美國用戶行使選擇權後,取得的股票將由美國券商 Alpaca Securities 代為託管。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/vw6bu9n
💰 美國現貨比特幣 ETF 資金回流!8 月 31 日合計淨流入 2.17 億美元,扭轉先前淨流出的局面。 - 🚀 貝萊德 IBIT 成為主要推手,貢獻 95% 流量;以太幣、XRP、Solana 相關基金也延續吸金趨勢。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/m5dqjfh
🇹🇭 泰國證券交易委員會擬開放散戶,可透過當地持牌業者投資海外數位資產衍生品。 - 📋 提案要求相關產品及交易所須符合特定監管標準,並非全面開放高槓桿的離岸合約交易。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/kd6ebg8
🤡 美國前眾議員桑托斯在預測市場自導自演,透過公開發言操縱自己是否出席國情咨文的賭盤結果。 - 🚫 平台 Kalshi 祭出史上首個終身禁令,並對他處以超過 7.1 萬美元的罰款,以儆效尤。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/p697p56
🇯🇵 日本金融廳提議放寬信託型穩定幣的稅務申報,以降低發行及受託機構的行政成本。 - ⚠️ 注意!此舉僅調整「受託人」的申報義務,並不代表穩定幣「持有人」未來可免稅或免除申報。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/qp6ugfe
📈 Strategy 再度出手!砸 3.7 億美元買入 4,603 枚比特幣,均價 80,318 美元,遭諷「低賣高買」。 - 🧐 增持後,Strategy 共持有 845,050 枚比特幣,整體均價為 75,412 美元,最新買入價比平均成本高出 6.5%。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/d4zyh8c
🚀 川普之子也來參一腳!預測市場平台 Polymarket 傳出新一輪募資消息,估值上看 210 億美元。 - 💰 由 Donald Trump Jr. 擔任合夥人的 1789 Capital 計畫投資約 3 億美元,此輪募資總規模約 10 億美元。 - 👉全文:https://qoo.run/8agdsu8
Showing the 12 most recent of 176 posts we hold for @blockcastit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@blocktemponews · 39,570
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@reporter_Taiwan · 59,426
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 August 2026
@theblockbeats · 37,299
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
@Gooaye · 105,971
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@binance_cn · 34,485
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@toncoin_cn · 142,434
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
@bitebishuqin · 40,260
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“區塊客 Blockcast.it-第一手 區塊鏈新聞” (@blockcastit), 12,474 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockcastit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.