Channel
@jinse2017
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,813subscribers
-339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001748596288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jinse2017 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jinse2017 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 22,813 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:27 | 22,808 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 22,819 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 22,832 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 22,838 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 22,854 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 22,860 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 22,880 | +10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 22,870 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 22,865 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 22,879 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:09 | 22,881 | +31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 22,850 | +27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 22,823 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 22,837 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 22,834 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 22,843 | -48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 22,891 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 22,910 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 22,919 | first reading |
533 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 533 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 367,712 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
【快讯】某巨鲸从Coinbase提取86.58万枚HYPE，价值7064万美元 金色财经报道，据OnchainLens监测，某巨鲸在过去17小时内从Coinbase提取82.44万枚HYPE，价值6752万美元；该巨鲸累计从Coinbase提取86.58万枚HYPE，价值7064万美元。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530839.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】天猫上线Token充值中心，首批接入阿里云、智谱、Kimi、MiniMax等国产模型厂商 【天猫上线Token充值中心，首批接入阿里云、智谱、Kimi、MiniMax等国产模型厂商】金色财经报道，9月3日，天猫正式上线AI空间站(Token充值中心)，用户可直接购买多家头部大模型订阅产品。页面显示，该充值中心集合了阿里云、智谱、Kimi、MiniMax等国内头部大模型厂商的订阅服务，在售商品包括按周期订阅的TokenPlan、CodingPlan以及按用量付费的充值方案,支持卡密或直充两种交付方式。此前一天，智谱已正式入驻天猫开设官方旗舰店，开售CodingPlan等订阅套餐。据了解，开店首日搜索环比暴涨40倍，大模型订阅服务开始进入电商消费场景。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530827.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】Robinhood Chain 单日链收入超 400 万美元，交易额位居公链赛道前列 金色财经报道，据 DeFiLlama 数据，Robinhood Chain 过去 24 小时 DEX 交易额约 18.51 亿美元，位居全链第二，仅次于 Solana 的 25.31 亿美元，高于以太坊的 13.20 亿美元、BSC 的 11.81 亿美元和 Base 的 8.00 亿美元。同期 Robinhood Chain 链费用约 445 万美元，链收入约 401 万美元，均位居 DeFiLlama Chain 口径第一。Solana、BSC、以太坊和 Base 四条链合计费用约 149 万美元，合计收入约 28.8 万美元。OKX 钱包宣布用户使用 OKX 内置 DEX 交易 Robinhood 链代币限时全额补贴 Gas 费，Binance Wallet 上线 Robinhood Chain 的 20% 手续费减免活动。 …
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】Hyperliquid开放HIP-4无许可部署，交易量增长近3倍 金色财经报道，据 Hyperliquid Research Collective 报告，Hyperliquid 于 8 月 29 日开放 HIP-4 无许可部署后，日均交易量从 54.5 万美元 升至 275 万美元，活跃交易者增至 1841 人。Outcome 占据 HIP-4 近 85% 交易量，其 100 万美元 激励计划推动了流动性。Hyperliquid 统一账户体系支持预测市场与永续合约对冲。HIP-4 曾于世界杯期间实现 18950 万美元 交易量。目前 HIP-4 面临的主要限制是监管准入，美国市场涉及 CFTC、SEC 监管框架，体育预测市场可能触发博彩审查。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530802.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】某ETH波段交易者以2417美元均价买入1650枚ETH 金色财经报道，据Ai姨监测，某ETH波段交易者以2417美元均价买入1650枚ETH，价值约400万美元，开启新一轮波段交易，该交易者自7月以来已完成4次ETH交易，累计获利约105万美元。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530799.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】美国SEC主席希望CLARITY法案9月15日通过参议院 金色财经报道，美国SEC主席Paul Atkins表示希望CLARITY法案能在9月15日通过参议院并提交总统签署。（CoinDesk） 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530800.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】市场消息：日本央行账户显示，周三没有进行大规模日元干预 【市场消息：日本央行账户显示，周三没有进行大规模日元干预】金色财经报道，市场消息：日本央行账户显示，周三没有进行大规模日元干预。(金十) 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530801.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】某地址今日买入9.08万枚HYPE，成交额约743万美元 金色财经报道，某地址今日累计买入9.08万枚HYPE，成交额约743万美元，目前该地址持有9.83万枚HYPE，价值约804.69万美元，其中HyperCore现货账户持有5.03万枚，HyperEVM原生HYPE持有4.80万枚，该地址剩余购买力约9267.72枚HYPE，若投入全部USDC，HYPE持仓理论上可增至约10.75万枚。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530797.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】博通盘前跌超2%，Q4营收逊预期，AI芯片收入指引仅略超预期 【博通盘前跌超2%，Q4营收逊预期，AI芯片收入指引仅略超预期】金色财经报道，9月3日，博通(AVGO.US)盘前跌超2%，报359.29美元。消息面上，博通第三财季净营收同比增长86%至295.91亿美元，续创单季营收新高、增速再创九年多新高；调整后每股收益同比增长96%至3.32美元。AI芯片收入同比增长221%至167亿美元，环比增长54%。然而，展望第四财季，博通预计营收约348亿美元，同比增长93%，低于分析师预期的350.5亿美元；其中，AI半导体收入指引217亿美元，同比增长236%，仅略高于市场预期的213.3亿美元。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530792.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】AI资本开支奔向3万亿美元，债市将成主要金主 金色财经报道，GokulHariharan的长期测算称，当前趋势指向Hyperscaler资本开支在2027年约1.4万亿美元，2030年升至约3万亿美元，并判断本十年内数据中心资本开支不会明显放缓。更关键的是融资结构：未来几年相关建设所需资金合计约5.5万亿美元，其中投资级债券市场需要承担约2.1万亿美元，是最大的单项外部资金来源。(金十) 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530791.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】BTC突破78000美元 【BTC突破78000美元】金色财经报道，行情显示，BTC突破78000美元，现报78011.84美元，24小时涨幅达到0.49%，行情波动较大，请做好风险控制。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530769.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
【快讯】金色午报 | 9月3日午间重要动态一览 【金色午报 | 9月3日午间重要动态一览】7:00-12:00关键词：Kalshi、Payward、CLARITY法案、伊朗 1.美SEC主席再次敦促国会推动CLARITY法案； 2.贝森特：对伊朗制裁将扩大至数字资产、航空及航运业； 3.Kraken母公司Payward将IPO计划推迟至最早2027年Q2； 4.日本央行决议前交易员高度警惕干预风险，“白银周”或成行动窗口； 5.高盛看涨黄金年底至4900美元：衍生品对冲或成“放大器”，金价可能冲得更高； 6.Arthur Hayes：ETH年内看涨至1万美元，美联储扩表将为加密市场注入流动性； 7.密歇根州法院已发布初步禁令，要求Kalshi继续阻止该州居民参与其体育赛事合约交易。 原文链接：https://www.jinse.com.cn/lives/530757.html
Signed 金色财经JinSeFinance
Showing the 12 most recent of 533 posts we hold for @jinse2017. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 23 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金色财经新闻频道” (@jinse2017), 22,813 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinse2017.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.