Channel
@bimi_chs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,459subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001318339742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bimi_chs |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bimi_chs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:07 | 8,459 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 8,474 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 8,473 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 8,470 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 8,477 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 8,484 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 8,491 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 8,492 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 8,493 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 8,492 | first reading |
480 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 480 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 480 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,374 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 480 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 480 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【trade.xyz与HPC联名致信CFTC，呼吁为能源永续合约及24/7交易建立美国监管路径】 trade.xyz 在 X 平台发文表示，其与@HyperliquidPC 联合向美国商品期货交易委员会提交评论信，呼吁为能源永续合约及 24/7 交易建立受监管的美国市场路径。该公司称，在今年的原油市场冲击期间，能源市场保持开放，而基准市场一度关闭；多个周末期间，trade.xyz 成为价格发现的主要场所。 评论信称，2 月 28 日中东冲突导致该地区能源出口中断并扰乱全球供应链，油市关闭期间，美国航空公司、炼油商和持有原油敞口的基金管理机构缺乏受监管的反应场所，直至期货市场于周日晚间重新开盘。3 月 9 日，布伦特原油价格一度接近每桶 120 美元，数周内航空煤油价格翻倍。 评论信称，在冲突发生后的首个周末，美国以外的市场参与者可通过 Hyperliquid 上的原油永续合约管理原油敞口；从周五收盘到基准市场重新开盘期…
【Core Lightning发布紧急安全更新，建议所有节点运行者立即升级】 Bitcoin News 在 X 平台发文表示，Core Lightning 26.06.7 版本已发布，修复了过去三周内负责任披露的多个漏洞。针对开源比特币项目的 AI 生成安全报告近期增加，具体漏洞信息将暂时保密两周，以便节点运营者完成升级后再公布技术细节和源代码。 开发者警告称，立即公布修复内容可能使攻击者反向分析漏洞，进而攻击尚未更新的节点。所有 Core Lightning 节点运行者均应立即升级。目前 Docker 镜像尚未 उपलब्ध，开发者明确警告用户不要等待 Docker 镜像。
【沃什鹰派表态推升加息押注，现货黄金日内跌超120美元】 8 月 29 日，美联储主席沃什就抑制通胀压力发表讲话后，市场对美联储加息的押注显著升温，美元随之走强，黄金等贵金属价格承压大跌。截至发稿，现货黄金日内下跌 2.6%，跌幅超 120 美元，报每盎司 4480 美元，盘中一度触及 4464 美元的一周低点。 独立分析师 Tai Wong 指出：「沃什主席明确表示通胀尚未出现实质性放缓，并强调美联储『仍有工作要做』，这一表态引发黄金市场遭遇剧烈抛售。尽管这可能仍是『雷声大雨点小』的沟通策略，但足以令市场将 9 月会议视为加息与暂停概率各半的胶着局面。」沃什此番言论是其迄今最为接近承认可能需要进一步加息以缓解价格压力的公开表态。 他在讲话中指出，若政策制定者无法确信基础通胀正稳步回归 2% 的目标水平，美联储就「还有工作要做」。受此影响，交易员迅速加大了对 9 月加息的押注规模。其他贵金属品种方面，现货白银下跌 3.63…
【美联储古尔斯比：通胀持续时间超出预期】 8 月 29 日，美联储古尔斯比表示，显然过热需求导致的通胀难以解决。通胀持续时间超出预期。关注重点必须仍然是判断通胀是否只是暂时性的。对 FOMC 会议次数没有强烈看法。
【Brian Armstrong：美国应开放股票永续合约，将创新型新市场引入本土】 Brian Armstrong 在 X 平台发文表示，美国发明了现代衍生品市场，但随着全球转向全天候永续合约，美国未能跟上金融创新步伐。现在是开放股票永续合约、将最具创新性的新市场引入美国本土的时候。
【Charles Schwab计划未来数月新增Solana、Avalanche及Chainlink交易】 金融服务公司 Charles Schwab 表示，计划在未来数月将 Solana、Avalanche 和 Chainlink 纳入加密货币交易平台，具体上线日期尚未公布。该平台于 2026 年 5 月开始向部分符合条件的散户客户开放比特币和以太坊直接交易。 客户可通过官网、移动应用及 thinkorswim 交易平台买卖相关加密货币，每笔交易收取 0.75%费用，即 1000 美元交易对应 7.50 美元。此前客户主要通过交易所交易产品及 Coinbase、Strategy 等公司股票获得加密货币敞口。 Charles Schwab 数字资产负责人 Joe Vietri 表示，此次扩展将增加客户配置数字资产的选择。CEO Rick Wurster 于 2025 年表示，公司正探索推出与美元挂钩的稳定币，但目前尚未公布相…
【英伟达支持的Lambda公司签署10亿美元私募债务协议】 8月29日消息，英伟达(NVDA.O)支持的Lambda公司签署10亿美元私募债务协议，用于芯片交易，据悉该笔交易由摩根大通牵头安排，债务面向私募配售投资者推介。知情人士补充称，这笔债务将用于采购英伟达 GPU 显卡，这批芯片后续将租赁给微软使用。
【过去1小时全网爆仓扩大至2.03亿美元，多单爆仓达1.96亿美元】 8月29日消息，据Coinglass数据显示，过去1小时全网爆仓扩大至2.03亿美元，多单爆仓达1.96亿美元，空单爆仓688万美元，BTC爆仓金额达8608万美元，ETH爆仓金额达5980万美元。
🌐 市场趋势分析 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 状态： FRESH · 偏向： 🔴📉 BEARISH · 风险： High 变化： 是 📈 K线分析 • BTC收于78,309.0，跌破EMA20(79,171)和EMA50(79,450)，MACD柱状图从+13.55恶化至-54.27，RSI从53.11降至32.82，动能从+30.9转为-851.1，1小时回报-1.51%，下行趋势确立。 📰 新闻分析 • OCC初步有条件批准World Liberty设立全国性信托银行发行稳定币USD1，阿布扎比王室成员持股49%，监管利好未能阻止技术性回调。 📊 数据分析 • 20个币种全部DOWN，4小时回报在-0.53%到-5.87%之间，BCH(-5.87%)、UNI(-3.36%)领跌，ETH-1.35%、SOL-0.53%相对抗跌，广度从上小时12UP/3DOWN急剧恶化为0UP/20DOWN。 🎯 策略 • 趋势转空，建…
【江卓尔：BTC与ETH均跌破上升通道，且周末ETF休市为多头弱势时间】 8 月 29 日，莱比特矿池（B.TOP）创始人江卓尔发文表示，BTC 和 ETH 均跌破上升通道，周末无 ETF 买盘为多头弱势时间，可能产生一波下跌。[原文链接]
【俄方称未收到9月恢复乌克兰问题谈判的提议】 8月29日，俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃28日表示，俄方未收到关于9月恢复乌克兰问题谈判的提议，无论是从乌克兰方面还是从其他方面。乌克兰总统办公室主任布达诺夫27日曾表示，乌俄谈判代表可能于9月会晤。（央视）
【"反CZ"巨鲸BTC和ETH多单浮盈超700万美元，投资回报率已超475%】 8月29日消息，据链上数据监测，"反 CZ"巨鲸开设的20倍杠杆比特币多单和 15 倍杠杆以太坊多单已浮盈超过 700 万美元，投资回报率达476%，该巨鲸曾因在 CZ 购入 ASTER 后立即3倍做空而闻名，目前其比特币多单仓位持有 31.31624 BTC，以太坊多单仓位持有 8,092.4521 ETH。
Showing the 12 most recent of 480 posts we hold for @bimi_chs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“币㊙️快讯｜Web3｜AI｜BTC ETH SOL｜比特币 以太坊｜MEME｜新闻” (@bimi_chs), 8,459 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bimi_chs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.