BTC空頭累積!盤口依然背離,小級別看漲?但又遲遲不動! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcQO2xpEcbY
Signed IFTTT

Channel
@tiaalert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,126subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001552243512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiaalert |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiaalert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 20,126 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:28 | 20,135 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 20,133 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 20,147 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 20,154 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 20,150 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 20,154 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 20,162 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 20,166 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 20,184 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 20,187 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 20,188 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 20,186 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 20,191 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 20,199 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 20,205 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 20,214 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 20,227 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 20,230 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 20,234 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (15 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 82,191 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
459 reactions across 39 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 257 | 56.0% | |
| 👍 | 133 | 29.0% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 12.9% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 1.53% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC空頭累積!盤口依然背離,小級別看漲?但又遲遲不動! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcQO2xpEcbY
Signed IFTTT
开学第一周 换到了新学校,是湾区数一数二的了吧。上学第一天,我对小孩说:「学校不错,但再好的学校,也别以为能学到什么重要的,别以为老师就不是蠢货。不要以为学校有响亮的名头,就放弃自己的主见,等别人灌输给你什么,多读几本书,培养自学能力。」 第一周,老师让自我介绍,并说说自己想做的工作,和最不想做的工作。 第一个男生说,他最不想做的工作是厨师,因为做菜很简单,似乎也不是重要。 老师听了勃然大怒。 是字面上的那种勃然大怒,是发怒到失态的那种,说这话太offensive(攻击性)了,这是对厨师的歧视,这违背了平等的精神,狠狠批判了半节课。 接下来的学生,是很会看脸色的,说自己最讨厌的事业是金融投机者,因为他们什么都不做,就赚很多钱,非常不公平。 老师赞许地点头。 后来,当然有学生说,自己最讨厌的是大公司的亿万富翁老板,因为他们自己什么都不做,金钱全是压榨和奴役员工来的。 老师号召同学们一起鼓掌。 除此之外,几乎所有…
👍27❤3🐳2
Signed tiabtc-discord
BTC看漲背離?小級別邊界清晰!牛回沒回,也要看價格行為! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cRglTNZQi0
❤7🔥1
Signed IFTTT
BTC高位盤整!蓄勢待發?還是掉頭向下? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM81maAeORQ
❤7
Signed IFTTT
BTC急跌$3000!假突破出現?正常盤整,還是下跌開始? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd1dLWp9yJ4
❤9🔥2
Signed IFTTT
BTC一浪一浪還在漲!未見頹勢信號,所以延續趨勢? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw_TyhmRCxA
❤3👍1
Signed IFTTT
BTC高位盤整!做多或做空?醞釀下一次的方向…… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Qa8fmbBINE
❤3🔥1
Signed IFTTT
BTC挑戰80000!受到強阻?能否上去? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iT5dq2XprI
🔥2❤1👍1
Signed IFTTT
BTC沖高受阻!能否繼續漲?牛來還是沒來? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoVH3OPoBow
❤8
Signed IFTTT
BTC暴漲79000!這是牛回了?現在怎麼做? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yf189F2NA
❤8👍1
Signed IFTTT
BTC不僅到了68000!還上了72000!這是牛回了? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_G1q5K5Cac
❤9🔥2
Signed IFTTT
BTC上了68000!殺空頭止損!繼續漲?馬上跌? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zag336YTlwo
❤7
Signed IFTTT
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @tiaalert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“提阿非羅TIABTC” (@tiaalert), 20,126 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiaalert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.