Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 比特币峰哥公开频道

Channel

比特币峰哥公开频道

@TraderfenggeTG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,091subscribers

+426 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001565179412
TypeChannel
Username@TraderfenggeTG
Description峰哥唯一私信链接:https://t.me/Traderfengge 峰哥YouTube比特币分析:https://youtube.com/@traderfengge 峰哥YouTube 美股分析:https://youtube.com/@fenggemeigu 峰哥X官方账号:https://twitter.com/Traderfengge 峰哥美股电报社区:https://t.me/fenggemg
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TraderfenggeTG

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

32,55633,16432,8607 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,666 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,658 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,655 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,645 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,637 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,608 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,603 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,600 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,584 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,574 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,563 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,556 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,595 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,622 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,650 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,668 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,718 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,733 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,740 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,755 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,759 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,751 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,763 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,777 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,775 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,802 subscribers7 September 2026 — 32,775 subscribers10 September 2026 — 32,764 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,765 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,782 subscribers16 September 2026 — 32,824 subscribers18 September 2026 — 32,853 subscribers30 September 2026 — 33,038 subscribers6 October 2026 — 33,054 subscribers10 October 2026 — 33,097 subscribers13 October 2026 — 33,122 subscribers14 October 2026 — 33,134 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,147 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,149 subscribers18 October 2026 — 33,139 subscribers19 October 2026 — 33,149 subscribers20 October 2026 — 33,164 subscribers21 October 2026 — 33,142 subscribers22 October 2026 — 33,150 subscribers23 October 2026 — 33,143 subscribers24 October 2026 — 33,141 subscribers25 October 2026 — 33,140 subscribers26 October 2026 — 33,129 subscribers28 October 2026 — 33,116 subscribers29 October 2026 — 33,122 subscribers30 October 2026 — 33,107 subscribers31 October 2026 — 33,091 subscribers33,0917 August 202631 October 2026
54 measurements spanning 85 days, net +426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,465–33,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 12:2833,091-16
30 Oct 2026, 15:3633,107-15
29 Oct 2026, 12:2133,122+6
28 Oct 2026, 14:1633,116-13
26 Oct 2026, 11:5633,129-11
25 Oct 2026, 13:0633,140-1
24 Oct 2026, 10:1733,141-2
23 Oct 2026, 12:2633,143-7
22 Oct 2026, 10:1633,150+8
21 Oct 2026, 03:1133,142-22
20 Oct 2026, 00:0433,164+15
19 Oct 2026, 02:4033,149+10
18 Oct 2026, 02:3933,139-10
17 Oct 2026, 03:2633,149+2
16 Oct 2026, 00:1633,147+13
14 Oct 2026, 22:1133,134+12
13 Oct 2026, 18:4733,122+25
10 Oct 2026, 05:5633,097+43
6 Oct 2026, 01:5833,054+16
30 Sept 2026, 21:5833,038first reading

Engagement

730 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 33,091 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
258 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.377%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
258
of 730 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 229 of 258 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held730 (6 August 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total921,160
Reactions total3,128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,500
Videos
≈29
Links
≈1,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,729 reactions across 590 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,08945.9%
👍2,14231.8%
🔥4316.41%
👏2123.15%
🍾1532.27%
💯1402.08%
😍1331.98%
🍓1081.60%
🏆1011.50%
🎉811.20%
💋530.788%
🙏420.624%
🤩290.431%
🥰150.223%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 621 of the 730 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,729 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 730 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC≈2,130 views15 reactionsread 31 October 2026

BTC 上方空单清算关注: 78056-79569-80249 下方多单清算关注: 77225-76456-76090

❤12👍2👏1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 11:18 UTC≈2,360 views1 reactionsread 31 October 2026

11月福利来袭🫴🫴🌹🌹 🎉🎉峰哥会员社区开放30个特大优惠名额💥💥 🔝🔝峰哥会员社区技术过硬,胜率较高,长期稳定。 🥇🥇本周整个会员层级10笔订单全胜,公开频道5笔全胜。 💰💰对于这样的战绩我们不过多解读,不骄傲,认真做好每一笔交易。顺境不浪,逆境不躁,保持平常心! 🥳🥳优惠活动截止11月1日24点!!! 🎶🎶私信666加入: https://t.me/Traderfengge

❤1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 04:38 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 31 October 2026

加入会员服务,获取更多精准策略。 https://t.me/Traderfengge

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 03:29 UTC≈2,940 views1 reactionsread 31 October 2026

https://youtu.be/ZgYg8VAGnfs?si=s51V1y2lKaxCWEdd

❤1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 03:13 UTC≈2,690 views5 reactionsread 31 October 2026

以太坊 🔴 上方空单清算区(可能上涨触发) 🔴 2,297 【强】 🔴 2,285 【强】 🔴 2,270 【强】 🟢 下方多单清算区(可能下跌触发) 🟢 2,234 【强】 🟢 2,205 【强】 🟢 2,186 【强】 近24小时多空爆仓较均衡;当前价格在 2,245 附近震荡,下方 2,234–2,186 存在较强的多单清算区,上方 2,270–2,297 存在较强的空单清算区,关注突破方向。

👍3❤2

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 02:25 UTC≈2,470 views13 reactionsread 31 October 2026

人们总喜欢在一帆风顺的时候有很多很多的想法,有很多很多的作法;人们又总喜欢在快要把自己作死的时候渴望力挽狂澜,绝处逢生,逆境翻盘,抱有诸多美好的期望!这个死循环会伴随很多人一生,这是实话,峰哥的肺腑之言,你不信,你就想想自己交易,自己的生活,是不是这样?

❤10👍2💯1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 02:18 UTC≈2,510 views8 reactionsread 31 October 2026

我见过很多一单重仓把自己套死的,也在今年见过一位同时买了24笔订单的朋友,当时他问我峰哥我这持仓怎么搞?我当时慌了,脑回路突然短路了,一时间竟然不知道怎么回复他。我心想,这特么依次看盘也得一两小时吧?我能怎么回?能给什么意见?最终他面临的问题就是割肉不愿意,持仓有爆仓风险,这种窘境好多人都经历过吧?

👍6❤2

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 02:12 UTC≈2,440 views9 reactionsread 31 October 2026

我们每个人仓位有限,精力有限,时间有限,去做你认为最有价值的事,但不能做完你所有想做的事,学会筛选,优质的交易信号才值得入手!风险永远伴随着我们每一笔交易,你不能绝对避免,只能尽可能降低!赚钱的方式有很多种找到自己擅长领域!

❤5👍2👏1💯1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 02:09 UTC≈2,420 views8 reactionsread 31 October 2026

这个交易市场最喜欢收拾的就是那种看到盘面全是交易信号的人。如果你不会筛选,不会分辨那些是机会哪些是陷阱,那么最终随着你的高频,会掉入很多陷阱,这时候第一个陷阱有可能你死里逃生,侥幸活了下来,第二个,第三个,你就没那么好运了!还有一类人同样会被收拾,那就是看到3个币,5个币,10个币同时想交易的人,他们眼里认为很多币跟比特币走势一样,所以疯狂扫货,你想想能跟比特币有联动作用的币不亚于上百个,你都买吗?买的完吗?考虑到有些币会出幺蛾子吗?最后直接一波把仓位干死!

👍7❤1

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 01:16 UTC≈2,640 views9 reactionsread 31 October 2026

还是一句话,是骡子是马出来遛一遛就知道了。 任何时候别只看博主的技术分析,更重要的你要看他敢不敢给公开单子,实战能力如何?远离嘴炮,爱惜仓位!

❤9

Signed 峰哥

31 Oct 2026, 01:14 UTC≈2,860 views0 reactionsread 31 October 2026

这一波,我们赢麻了,赢麻了。 🔝🔝会员群10连胜➕2亏➕5连胜 🔝🔝超级会员14连胜➕3亏➕5连胜 🔝🔝公开频道福利10连胜➕5连胜 我们正在创造奇迹,正在超越自己!没有压力,没有挑战,那也没什么意思,我们每天都全力以赴! 联系方式: https://t.me/Traderfengge

Signed 峰哥

Showing the 12 most recent of 730 posts we hold for @TraderfenggeTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2026, 01:54 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

你认为币安被盗负面对行情影响

  1. 短期内能够修复31%
  2. 继续下破75000,持续影响45%
  3. 焦灼状态,一段时间得横盘消磨26%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Oct 2026, 03:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,750 voters approx.

你是否希望比特币进一步下跌?

  1. 是的42%
  2. 不希望40%
  3. 随便19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Oct 2026, 00:17 UTCAnonymous Poll927 voters

当前BTC你认为

  1. 先到9万59%
  2. 先到8万41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Sept 2026, 03:44 UTCAnonymous Poll433 voters

你认为BNB的涨幅,能否跑赢比特币?

  1. 能57%
  2. 不能44%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTCAnonymous Poll949 voters

你今年情况

  1. 赚钱42%
  2. 亏钱58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTCAnonymous Poll949 voters

你的虚拟货币交易生涯整体情况

  1. 赚钱32%
  2. 亏钱68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 730 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

feiyangkanbi
@feiyangkanbi · 414
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 45,709
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 29,183
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
提阿非羅TIABTC
@tiaalert · 19,833
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
Leo-加密貨幣頻道
@Xboshi1 · 21,333
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 80,552
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto_獵捕者合約帝
@oobbb1 · 21,674
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,588
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 137,217
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
欧易OKX公告
@OKXAnnouncements_CN · 45,137
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 234,155
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时
@jinseBTC · 23,915
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,827
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 23,578
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
Odaily资讯速递
@Odaily_News · 20,258
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 37,914
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 265,327
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“比特币峰哥公开频道” (@TraderfenggeTG), 33,091 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderfenggeTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.