BTC 上方空单清算关注: 78056-79569-80249 下方多单清算关注: 77225-76456-76090
❤12👍2👏1
Signed 峰哥

Channel
@TraderfenggeTG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,091subscribers
+426 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001565179412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TraderfenggeTG |
| Description | 峰哥唯一私信链接:https://t.me/Traderfengge 峰哥YouTube比特币分析:https://youtube.com/@traderfengge 峰哥YouTube 美股分析:https://youtube.com/@fenggemeigu 峰哥X官方账号:https://twitter.com/Traderfengge 峰哥美股电报社区:https://t.me/fenggemg |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TraderfenggeTG |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 33,091 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 33,107 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 33,122 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 33,116 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 33,129 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 33,140 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 33,141 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 33,143 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 33,150 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 33,142 | -22 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:04 | 33,164 | +15 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 33,149 | +10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 33,139 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:26 | 33,149 | +2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 33,147 | +13 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 33,134 | +12 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 33,122 | +25 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 33,097 | +43 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 33,054 | +16 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 33,038 | first reading |
730 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 229 of 258 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 730 (6 August 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 921,160 |
| Reactions total | 3,128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,729 reactions across 590 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,089 | 45.9% | |
| 👍 | 2,142 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 431 | 6.41% | |
| 👏 | 212 | 3.15% | |
| 🍾 | 153 | 2.27% | |
| 💯 | 140 | 2.08% | |
| 😍 | 133 | 1.98% | |
| 🍓 | 108 | 1.60% | |
| 🏆 | 101 | 1.50% | |
| 🎉 | 81 | 1.20% | |
| 💋 | 53 | 0.788% | |
| 🙏 | 42 | 0.624% | |
| 🤩 | 29 | 0.431% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 0.223% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 621 of the 730 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,729 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 730 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC 上方空单清算关注: 78056-79569-80249 下方多单清算关注: 77225-76456-76090
❤12👍2👏1
Signed 峰哥
11月福利来袭🫴🫴🌹🌹 🎉🎉峰哥会员社区开放30个特大优惠名额💥💥 🔝🔝峰哥会员社区技术过硬,胜率较高,长期稳定。 🥇🥇本周整个会员层级10笔订单全胜,公开频道5笔全胜。 💰💰对于这样的战绩我们不过多解读,不骄傲,认真做好每一笔交易。顺境不浪,逆境不躁,保持平常心! 🥳🥳优惠活动截止11月1日24点!!! 🎶🎶私信666加入: https://t.me/Traderfengge
❤1
Signed 峰哥
加入会员服务,获取更多精准策略。 https://t.me/Traderfengge
Signed 峰哥
https://youtu.be/ZgYg8VAGnfs?si=s51V1y2lKaxCWEdd
❤1
Signed 峰哥
#比特币
Signed 峰哥
以太坊 🔴 上方空单清算区(可能上涨触发) 🔴 2,297 【强】 🔴 2,285 【强】 🔴 2,270 【强】 🟢 下方多单清算区(可能下跌触发) 🟢 2,234 【强】 🟢 2,205 【强】 🟢 2,186 【强】 近24小时多空爆仓较均衡;当前价格在 2,245 附近震荡,下方 2,234–2,186 存在较强的多单清算区,上方 2,270–2,297 存在较强的空单清算区,关注突破方向。
👍3❤2
Signed 峰哥
人们总喜欢在一帆风顺的时候有很多很多的想法,有很多很多的作法;人们又总喜欢在快要把自己作死的时候渴望力挽狂澜,绝处逢生,逆境翻盘,抱有诸多美好的期望!这个死循环会伴随很多人一生,这是实话,峰哥的肺腑之言,你不信,你就想想自己交易,自己的生活,是不是这样?
❤10👍2💯1
Signed 峰哥
我见过很多一单重仓把自己套死的,也在今年见过一位同时买了24笔订单的朋友,当时他问我峰哥我这持仓怎么搞?我当时慌了,脑回路突然短路了,一时间竟然不知道怎么回复他。我心想,这特么依次看盘也得一两小时吧?我能怎么回?能给什么意见?最终他面临的问题就是割肉不愿意,持仓有爆仓风险,这种窘境好多人都经历过吧?
👍6❤2
Signed 峰哥
我们每个人仓位有限,精力有限,时间有限,去做你认为最有价值的事,但不能做完你所有想做的事,学会筛选,优质的交易信号才值得入手!风险永远伴随着我们每一笔交易,你不能绝对避免,只能尽可能降低!赚钱的方式有很多种找到自己擅长领域!
❤5👍2👏1💯1
Signed 峰哥
这个交易市场最喜欢收拾的就是那种看到盘面全是交易信号的人。如果你不会筛选,不会分辨那些是机会哪些是陷阱,那么最终随着你的高频,会掉入很多陷阱,这时候第一个陷阱有可能你死里逃生,侥幸活了下来,第二个,第三个,你就没那么好运了!还有一类人同样会被收拾,那就是看到3个币,5个币,10个币同时想交易的人,他们眼里认为很多币跟比特币走势一样,所以疯狂扫货,你想想能跟比特币有联动作用的币不亚于上百个,你都买吗?买的完吗?考虑到有些币会出幺蛾子吗?最后直接一波把仓位干死!
👍7❤1
Signed 峰哥
还是一句话,是骡子是马出来遛一遛就知道了。 任何时候别只看博主的技术分析,更重要的你要看他敢不敢给公开单子,实战能力如何?远离嘴炮,爱惜仓位!
❤9
Signed 峰哥
这一波,我们赢麻了,赢麻了。 🔝🔝会员群10连胜➕2亏➕5连胜 🔝🔝超级会员14连胜➕3亏➕5连胜 🔝🔝公开频道福利10连胜➕5连胜 我们正在创造奇迹,正在超越自己!没有压力,没有挑战,那也没什么意思,我们每天都全力以赴! 联系方式: https://t.me/Traderfengge
Signed 峰哥
Showing the 12 most recent of 730 posts we hold for @TraderfenggeTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你认为币安被盗负面对行情影响
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
你是否希望比特币进一步下跌?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
当前BTC你认为
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你认为BNB的涨幅,能否跑赢比特币?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你今年情况
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你的虚拟货币交易生涯整体情况
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 730 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特币峰哥公开频道” (@TraderfenggeTG), 33,091 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderfenggeTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.