刚提到了第一种说法,8万站稳就不用怀疑背后有真实的资金买盘承接推进 如果再向上拉一针,突破了85000,这个结构很像是牛旗第一波上涨,之前踏空的人一样还可以买现货,而且有不小的空间
🔥13❤9🎉8😁8👍7
Signed Crypto友良

Channel
@btcyouliang
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,837subscribers
-511 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001715389371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btcyouliang |
| Description | 专注二级市场实战的深度研究圈✨ VIP服务咨询: @wanggebtc 业务推广合作: @cryptoyouliang 双向机器人: @Bitwangge_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btcyouliang |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
103,000 average views per post against 28,837 subscribers — an engagement rate of 357.5%. Across the 1,711 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.51% and 8.02%, with a median of 3.40%.
| Window | 30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 2,886,900 |
| Mature posts only | 357.5% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 28,837 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 1,711 channels · p10 0.457% · p25 1.51% · p50 3.40% · p75 8.02% · p90 15.7% |
| Position in cohort | 99.942th percentile · 105.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.105% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 28,837 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 28,855 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 28,879 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 28,897 | -48 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 28,945 | -49 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 28,994 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 29,019 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:25 | 29,042 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:13 | 29,062 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 29,082 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 29,085 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 29,102 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 29,116 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 29,125 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 29,124 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 29,134 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 29,144 | -29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 29,173 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 29,179 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 29,194 | first reading |
91 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (20 July 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,504,900 |
| Reactions total | 1,030 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,004 reactions across 91 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,035 | 25.8% | |
| 👍 | 885 | 22.1% | |
| 🔥 | 687 | 17.2% | |
| 🎉 | 668 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 660 | 16.5% | |
| 🙏 | 49 | 1.22% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 0.375% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 0.125% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,004 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
刚提到了第一种说法,8万站稳就不用怀疑背后有真实的资金买盘承接推进 如果再向上拉一针,突破了85000,这个结构很像是牛旗第一波上涨,之前踏空的人一样还可以买现货,而且有不小的空间
🔥13❤9🎉8😁8👍7
Signed Crypto友良
实际操作上也不用着急,涨上去了会给你机会,跌下来一样会给你机会,现在没有脱离区间,不管怎么做概率都比较小 我觉得不错的位置,从21号开始形成的区间,上沿高点是82500,只要到了,我目前空仓的情况下会尝试做空,但是会控制仓位, 79500-79000属于上涨的中轴而且这里形成的支撑在图里非常明显,属于做多做空都有机会的一个点,但是现在没办法判断,主要是看这里的得失,
❤16🎉9😁7👍5🔥5
Signed Crypto友良
美联储加息、清晰法案受挫、日本央行加息,本质上都够偏空,连续利空下来,市场的空头预期明显要变重 结构上有三个位置,78000是周线收复,突破后结构会更利于趋势向上,75000的位置属于支撑测了4次,每次测试都会给市场增加一批空头,而支阻的位置一直是77100,得失就显得比较重要,几轮没有跌破也说明了一部分问题,明显低估了市场的买盘强度 行情上也偏向于价格从7.6万往上买 → 7.71万/7.8万这些位置被收回 → 空头开始止损和强平 → 后半段上涨明显加速,市场连续吃了几个利空都跌不下去,等价格重新拿回关键位置以后,原本押着继续跌的仓位反而成了上涨的燃料。 主要还是看后续的行情,爆空结束后,8万还能不能站稳,能的话就不用怀疑,背后有真实的资金买盘承接才导致连续利空没把价格打下去;如果又回到7.9以下,不管本周还是周一开盘,那我都偏向于拉一波骗炮然后诱散户上车,觉得顶着宏观利空还能往上冲,散户上了车,再进行一波闷杀
❤12🎉8🔥6👍5😁5
Signed Crypto友良
两个单子都被打保本了😶🌫️,继续说下现在行情的看法吧
❤9🎉9😁9👍5🔥4
Signed Crypto友良
今天再做一个收口吧,白天的时候做了一个77000的空单,限价应该是该进的都进了 这个现在同样有点利润,继续拿吧,虽然空间不大,但还是原先结构上的看法,破位之后才会打开空间。
🎉11🔥8❤7👍7😁4
Signed Crypto友良
做ZEC这种币,尤其是现在势头猛,资费高的时候,耐心一点,配合的级别也尽量小一点 现在这个是5分钟级别的,突破了1400之后形成带量上涨,这里三次测试都是突破失败,那第四次突破之后就不应该再去做空了,严重逆势,这是一个技巧 那现在也一样,1500的空单,有一部分人跟着我进了,今晚同样关注的是这个位置1400,破位了那可能会向1320再延升一下,但山寨波动大,没法做保证,散户只要做好保护就行了!🚀
👍12🔥10😁8❤4🎉4
Signed Crypto友良
还不错,1500入场后走出了一点下行空间,这单试水,基本就可以做保本了~
😁12❤7👍7🔥7🎉4
Signed Crypto友良
一二浪上涨完成后目前三浪,我入场会选择1500左右的限价,山寨币原因仓位较小,属于盈亏比不错试试水 止损1555以上,目标TP暂定1380。因为现在属于真空区,没什么信号或者指标,单纯按照每次上涨的波段幅度进行判断,各位谨慎尝试~
❤11🎉8👍8🔥7😁5
Signed Crypto友良
ZEC已经1470,涨了24%。最大催化是Paradigm持有ZEC,把ZEC称作BTC的隐私补充。这句话已经把ZEC的位置摆清了。 BTC负责公开、可验证,ZEC补上隐私。BTC越主流,这种补充越容易被看见,价值也就体现得越充分
❤10👍7🔥7🎉6😁6
Signed Crypto友良
思路也在图中标注很明显,转换位置77000左右做空,损定价78500。 按照第一个看就可以,我重新入场低倍低定价79500。目标两个位置,TP1前低75000,TP2通道下轨72800!✊🏻
🔥16👍10❤8🎉6😁5
Signed Crypto友良
再就目前的行情还有之前的观点来看,总的没有太大的变化,宏观的影响往往判定大方向,盘面决定现在的情况该如何寻找位置 下降通道的结构还有框架已经足够明显了,接下来就是围绕这里去做布局,就像上次做的78800空单一样 现在价格处于中轨附近,但成交量已经出现明显的下降了,我觉得如果再出现一次带量下跌,有概率就会直接形成破位
😁13❤10🎉10👍5
Signed Crypto友良
先来说宏观的,加息目前落地市场基本消化了一部分,起码到现在为止,兑现了一次加息,市场默认还有三次加息 但比特币还是很硬的,反弹到了76500左右,买盘真的太强了,但我个人觉得,短期的反弹并不能抵御长期的宏观风险 因为有一个点,点阵图显示的最基础的东西是再加两次息,透过里面还有重要的是原先的市场想的是加息/经济稳定/重新降息,2027年底的利率还是4.1%,说明高利率要在2027年变成新常态
👍11❤8🎉7🔥6😁6
Signed Crypto友良
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @btcyouliang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀” (@btcyouliang), 28,837 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcyouliang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.