Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀

Channel

TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀

@btcyouliang

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,837subscribers

-511 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715389371
TypeChannel
Username@btcyouliang
Description专注二级市场实战的深度研究圈✨ VIP服务咨询: @wanggebtc 业务推广合作: @cryptoyouliang 双向机器人: @Bitwangge_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/btcyouliang

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

103,000 average views per post against 28,837 subscribers — an engagement rate of 357.5%. Across the 1,711 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.51% and 8.02%, with a median of 3.40%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,886,900
Mature posts only357.5% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers28,837 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:zho · 1,711 channels · p10 0.457% · p25 1.51% · p50 3.40% · p75 8.02% · p90 15.7%
Position in cohort99.942th percentile · 105.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.105% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

28,83729,34829,092.57 August 2026 — 29,348 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,348 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,344 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,322 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,301 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,289 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,267 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,254 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,256 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,232 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,214 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,205 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,197 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,194 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,179 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,173 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,144 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,134 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,124 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,125 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,116 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,102 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,085 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,082 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,062 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,042 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,019 subscribers7 September 2026 — 28,994 subscribers10 September 2026 — 28,945 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,897 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,879 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,855 subscribers17 September 2026 — 28,837 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,760–29,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:3928,837-18
15 Sept 2026, 14:3828,855-24
14 Sept 2026, 00:3828,879-18
12 Sept 2026, 08:3628,897-48
10 Sept 2026, 03:5828,945-49
7 Sept 2026, 00:3828,994-25
4 Sept 2026, 11:1929,019-23
2 Sept 2026, 23:2529,042-20
1 Sept 2026, 19:1329,062-20
31 Aug 2026, 15:3629,082-3
30 Aug 2026, 18:0929,085-17
29 Aug 2026, 20:3329,102-14
28 Aug 2026, 20:1229,116-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:0329,125+1
26 Aug 2026, 18:0329,124-10
25 Aug 2026, 15:4829,134-10
24 Aug 2026, 13:4529,144-29
22 Aug 2026, 20:4629,173-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:0729,179-15
20 Aug 2026, 10:3529,194first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
334.1%
avg views ÷ 28,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
96,300
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.041%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held91 (20 July 202618 September 2026)
Views total2,504,900
Reactions total1,030
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,040
Videos
12
Links
232

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,004 reactions across 91 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,03525.8%
👍88522.1%
🔥68717.2%
🎉66816.7%
😁66016.5%
🙏491.22%
👏150.375%
🕊50.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,004 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC≈78,800 views45 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

刚提到了第一种说法,8万站稳就不用怀疑背后有真实的资金买盘承接推进 如果再向上拉一针,突破了85000,这个结构很像是牛旗第一波上涨,之前踏空的人一样还可以买现货,而且有不小的空间

🔥139🎉8😁8👍7

Signed Crypto友良

18 Sept 2026, 15:57 UTC≈78,400 views42 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

实际操作上也不用着急,涨上去了会给你机会,跌下来一样会给你机会,现在没有脱离区间,不管怎么做概率都比较小 我觉得不错的位置,从21号开始形成的区间,上沿高点是82500,只要到了,我目前空仓的情况下会尝试做空,但是会控制仓位, 79500-79000属于上涨的中轴而且这里形成的支撑在图里非常明显,属于做多做空都有机会的一个点,但是现在没办法判断,主要是看这里的得失,

16🎉9😁7👍5🔥5

Signed Crypto友良

18 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈78,300 views36 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

美联储加息、清晰法案受挫、日本央行加息,本质上都够偏空,连续利空下来,市场的空头预期明显要变重 结构上有三个位置,78000是周线收复,突破后结构会更利于趋势向上,75000的位置属于支撑测了4次,每次测试都会给市场增加一批空头,而支阻的位置一直是77100,得失就显得比较重要,几轮没有跌破也说明了一部分问题,明显低估了市场的买盘强度 行情上也偏向于价格从7.6万往上买 → 7.71万/7.8万这些位置被收回 → 空头开始止损和强平 → 后半段上涨明显加速,市场连续吃了几个利空都跌不下去,等价格重新拿回关键位置以后,原本押着继续跌的仓位反而成了上涨的燃料。 主要还是看后续的行情,爆空结束后,8万还能不能站稳,能的话就不用怀疑,背后有真实的资金买盘承接才导致连续利空没把价格打下去;如果又回到7.9以下,不管本周还是周一开盘,那我都偏向于拉一波骗炮然后诱散户上车,觉得顶着宏观利空还能往上冲,散户上了车,再进行一波闷杀

12🎉8🔥6👍5😁5

Signed Crypto友良

18 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC≈77,800 views36 reactionsread 23 September 2026

两个单子都被打保本了😶‍🌫️,继续说下现在行情的看法吧

9🎉9😁9👍5🔥4

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC≈78,100 views37 reactionsread 23 September 2026

今天再做一个收口吧,白天的时候做了一个77000的空单,限价应该是该进的都进了 这个现在同样有点利润,继续拿吧,虽然空间不大,但还是原先结构上的看法,破位之后才会打开空间。

🎉11🔥87👍7😁4

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC≈78,000 views38 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

做ZEC这种币,尤其是现在势头猛,资费高的时候,耐心一点,配合的级别也尽量小一点 现在这个是5分钟级别的,突破了1400之后形成带量上涨,这里三次测试都是突破失败,那第四次突破之后就不应该再去做空了,严重逆势,这是一个技巧 那现在也一样,1500的空单,有一部分人跟着我进了,今晚同样关注的是这个位置1400,破位了那可能会向1320再延升一下,但山寨波动大,没法做保证,散户只要做好保护就行了!🚀

👍12🔥10😁84🎉4

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC≈77,700 views37 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

还不错,1500入场后走出了一点下行空间,这单试水,基本就可以做保本了~

😁127👍7🔥7🎉4

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC≈77,700 views39 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

一二浪上涨完成后目前三浪,我入场会选择1500左右的限价,山寨币原因仓位较小,属于盈亏比不错试试水 止损1555以上,目标TP暂定1380。因为现在属于真空区,没什么信号或者指标,单纯按照每次上涨的波段幅度进行判断,各位谨慎尝试~

11🎉8👍8🔥7😁5

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈77,900 views36 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

ZEC已经1470,涨了24%。最大催化是Paradigm持有ZEC,把ZEC称作BTC的隐私补充。这句话已经把ZEC的位置摆清了。 BTC负责公开、可验证,ZEC补上隐私。BTC越主流,这种补充越容易被看见,价值也就体现得越充分

10👍7🔥7🎉6😁6

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC≈77,700 views45 reactionsread 23 September 2026

思路也在图中标注很明显,转换位置77000左右做空,损定价78500。 按照第一个看就可以,我重新入场低倍低定价79500。目标两个位置,TP1前低75000,TP2通道下轨72800!✊🏻

🔥16👍108🎉6😁5

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 07:33 UTC≈77,600 views38 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

再就目前的行情还有之前的观点来看,总的没有太大的变化,宏观的影响往往判定大方向,盘面决定现在的情况该如何寻找位置 下降通道的结构还有框架已经足够明显了,接下来就是围绕这里去做布局,就像上次做的78800空单一样 现在价格处于中轨附近,但成交量已经出现明显的下降了,我觉得如果再出现一次带量下跌,有概率就会直接形成破位

😁1310🎉10👍5

Signed Crypto友良

17 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC≈77,700 views38 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

先来说宏观的,加息目前落地市场基本消化了一部分,起码到现在为止,兑现了一次加息,市场默认还有三次加息 但比特币还是很硬的,反弹到了76500左右,买盘真的太强了,但我个人觉得,短期的反弹并不能抵御长期的宏观风险 因为有一个点,点阵图显示的最基础的东西是再加两次息,透过里面还有重要的是原先的市场想的是加息/经济稳定/重新降息,2027年底的利率还是4.1%,说明高利率要在2027年变成新常态

👍118🎉7🔥6😁6

Signed Crypto友良

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @btcyouliang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto_獵捕者合約帝
@oobbb1 · 21,258
#1
幣圈超級賽亞人(主動私訊你的是騙子)
@cake102468 · 10,533
#2
幣圈Buffett_kama
@hdshdgjashds · 14,327
#3
Crpking的投资心理知识库
@zhigebtcchat · 5,855
#4
逆途⚔️𝓡𝓲𝓬𝓱
@Cor_Leone0 · 10,962
#5
T神_加密合約社區
@Tshen666888 · 10,212
#6
『以命为棋』实盘策略分析🚀
@BTC8883 · 2,217
#7
Leo-加密貨幣頻道
@Xboshi1 · 20,654
#8
比特币飞扬公开频道
@feiyangkanbi · 23,581
#9
Seven-加密貨幣社區
@fanji8888 · 13,692
#10
寫輪眼致富基地(主動私訊都是騙子)
@Traderfenggecn · 5,526
#11
東哥Crypto JB唯一电报公开频道
@JBcryptotrader881117 · 5,508
#12
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 25,268
#13
幣勝客_加密趨勢捕捉
@cryptoelroy · 12,355
#14
【比特币】币圈策略分析🇨🇳
@eth77896bnb · 9,457
#15
合約騎士 — 衝擊🅰️9️⃣
@btc100w100w2 · 7,066
#16
R總的交易頻道
@rzong392888 · 7,567
#17
波段猛牛-加密衝鋒隊
@pionexcn_MN · 3,100
#18
招財貓-幣圈合約最强Trader
@crypto_achan_tw · 7,459
#19
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,412
#20
Captain_艦長_幣圈合約戰艦
@Bitgetxizi · 5,384
#21
胖丁❤️個人投資筆記
@btc_dingLoVeTS · 3,154
#22
Simba 幣圈合約王
@simbacryptoking · 5,422
#23
撈金團 - 合約波段技術面研究
@laojintuan66666 · 6,643
#24
金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时
@jinseBTC · 23,761
#25
【Colin】幣圈研究所
@crypto_colin · 10,006
#26
Crypto Hunters|造富工坊
@pepeboost168888 · 5,825
#27
Chenge 二级市场从业者
@ChengeTrader · 19,072
#28
砸鍋賣鐵去炒幣
@bitgetnico · 11,434
#29
幣圈趨勢分析-Bit帶你飛🌈
@bitget_voyager · 12,099
#30
Saber Alpha | 加密信號研究 🌐
@news_crypto00 · 2,892
#31
三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 30,951
#32
Kyle—加密貨幣起飛站🛫【主動私訊都是騙子】
@bitgetTW11 · 8,156
#33
『 豪仔說幣』— 閃擊牛市💰
@btc1868888 · 3,848
#34
Ashley帶你賺U
@Ashley_uulai · 8,980
#35
【預言家】合約策略分析頻道
@yuyanjia66 · 5,362
#36
Cora財富舵手_合約分享
@oobbb6 · 12,229
#37
加密貨幣社區(虎哥策略分析)💎💰
@huge889977 · 5,269
#38
加密魔術師-Nemo免費合約社區
@huahuayjy9 · 9,007
#39
BTC-ETH【策略分析🛫】
@ETHeth1688 · 2,686
#40
UMIE_加密貨幣
@IvanCryptotalk · 5,974
#41
維多利加市場預測
@lbeobhpreo · 2,894
#42
劉Coin
@crypto_liufan · 10,794
#43
福布斯富婆 👑 viki財經
@ChinapumpWXC011 · 6,132
#44
CC-短線刺客交易圈
@cryptoslaowai2 · 6,870
#45
幣圈航海王(駛向牛市的方向)
@aicoincn0 · 814
#46
比特币军长
@junzhangbtc · 16,185
#47
高倍獵手_幣圈短線狙擊
@gaobeilieshou666 · 4,150
#48
⟦Zero⟧—加密貨幣
@Bitget_crypto1 · 5,190
#49
Hugo 雨果幣圈財源社區
@MysteriousCamp · 8,755
#50
区块链冷眼社群(牛市警告⚠️)
@btc887 · 5,235
#51
章魚船長🚢加密貸幣巨輪
@heyueSunbeams · 776
#52
浪花团队比特币【公开频道】
@LanghuaJuziBTC · 3,277
#53
Aatrox 加密社區
@bitgetMrcrab · 2,297
#54
币㊙️快讯|Web3|AI|BTC ETH SOL|比特币 以太坊|MEME|新闻
@bimi_chs · 8,447
#55
Circle ‘s 分享区
@Circlebtc12 · 9,920
#56
Alpha•比特幣凱皇🏄‍♂️(私訊搭訕 一律詐騙)
@waylars · 11,865
#57
Spike-幣圈交易軌跡
@Spike_EL · 7,551
#58
威廉的加密社區
@cryptporachel · 8,398
#59
Aiden - 山寨渔夫
@aidenbiquanjidi · 9,283
#60
比特币以太坊行情分析(每日发布免费策略)
@qqbtceth1688 · 19,665
#61
Crypto_頭號玩家
@balige811 · 2,602
#62
LiYaの幣圈局
@cryptoMandy6 · 1,644
#63
賺u永動機社區
@cryptoshougeji888 · 8,228
#64
幣圈殺手🥷
@jackscryptohk · 1,625
#65
Owen交易筆記
@Crypto_Owen111 · 7,893
#66
狼星信號SIG.K
@usdt_Saber2_Crypto · 7,995
#67
King的幣圈合約交易軌跡✍️
@cryptowesear · 5,644
#68
重生之咖子的二级天王梦
@BtCoffeeSpace · 8,955
#69
Kaven_實盤分析王
@colin112 · 2,459
#70
大镖客小伙伴们畅所欲言群
@dabiaoke9537 · 726 (as read 9 September 2026)
#71
🔥幣來贏【加密】翻倉參謀部🔥
@BiLaiYinPro · 726
#72
Simba幣圈合約
@xianzhisimba · 1,091 (as read 9 September 2026)
#73
「White」比特币趋势交易📈
@BTC168668 · 2,774
#74
麒麟社(币圈优质博主聚合平台)
@qilin456456 · 1,796
#75
Esen的合約猛攻社區
@Crypto_CD01 · 3,902
#76
梭哈研究院
@heyueCryptoKingdom · 893
#77
XXCrypto中文社区
@qihangkxia · 2,527
#78
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,492
#79
金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,784
#80
加密賽亞人
@btcduanxian · 4,276
#81
Ricky韭菜聚集地
@bebeooo9898 · 1,502
#82
Li-Crypto致富基地
@litchijiamizhifujidi · 1,390
#83
火箭燃燒彈-加密宇宙霸主
@bitgetTW99 · 1,390
#84
宋一雯 & King & 张叶 的策略分享群
@FFEX3 · 1,411
#85
Alpha加密法老
@bitgetTW_MILO · 1,152
#86
圈圈的加密領域研究所
@quanquancrypto · 13,532
#87
飞鱼比特币行情资讯
@BTC1555 · 1,478
#88
《比克学院》策略体验频道
@biquanfenxi · 1,560
#89
启航比特币币圈策略分析🚀
@qihangbtc1 · 10,325
#90
智神|比特币行情分析
@zhigebtc · 12,422
#91
提阿非羅TIABTC
@tiaalert · 20,061
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 30,951
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
舒琴比特币行情资讯(其他均为仿冒)
@bitebishuqin · 40,412
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
比特币飞扬公开频道
@feiyangkanbi · 23,581
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
金色财经/币圈快讯7*24小时
@jinseBTC · 23,761
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 25,121
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 25,268
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 255,096
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
欧易OKX公告
@OKXAnnouncements_CN · 44,940
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
金色财经新闻频道
@jinse2017 · 22,784
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 239,544
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 83,700
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 288,827
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 24,042
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
動區動趨 BlockTempo⚡️區塊鏈 加密貨幣新聞
@blocktemponews · 39,179
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
互联网观察
@guanchahulw · 67,029
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
Toncoin 中文频道
@toncoin_cn · 141,084
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀” (@btcyouliang), 28,837 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcyouliang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.