结构上还是在4小时的下行通道,现在的消息还没全部落地,做单的空间比较小 因为要关注两个价格区,82000是本周的阻力区,但是已经测试过一次;84000是这个下行阶段的阻力区。 要入场可以取个均价83000左右挂限价进场,止损84800。做多的话目前没有建议,资费偏高,追车的人太多,缺一波大洗❗️
👍24❤11😁8🔥7🎉5
Signed Crypto友良

Channel
@btcyouliang
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,056subscribers
-1,292 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001715389371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btcyouliang |
| Description | 专注二级市场实战的深度研究圈✨ VIP服务咨询: @wanggebtc 业务推广合作: @cryptoyouliang 双向机器人: @Bitwangge_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btcyouliang |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
67,700 average views per post against 28,119 subscribers — an engagement rate of 240.7%. Across the 2,085 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.76% and 11.0%, with a median of 4.89%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,285,720 |
| Mature posts only | 240.7% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 28,119 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 2,085 channels · p10 0.495% · p25 1.76% · p50 4.89% · p75 11.0% · p90 24.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.904th percentile · 49.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.103% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:50 | 28,056 | -29 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:31 | 28,085 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:45 | 28,097 | -22 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:17 | 28,119 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 28,125 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 28,129 | -20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 28,149 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:15 | 28,159 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 28,169 | -17 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 28,186 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 28,204 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 28,219 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 28,234 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 28,252 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 28,262 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 28,284 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 28,310 | -34 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 28,344 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 28,362 | -17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 28,379 | first reading |
110 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 152 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 110 (20 July 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 703,020 |
| Reactions total | 509 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,759 reactions across 109 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,182 | 24.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,097 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 830 | 17.4% | |
| 😁 | 799 | 16.8% | |
| 🎉 | 780 | 16.4% | |
| 🙏 | 49 | 1.03% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 0.315% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.147% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,759 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
结构上还是在4小时的下行通道,现在的消息还没全部落地,做单的空间比较小 因为要关注两个价格区,82000是本周的阻力区,但是已经测试过一次;84000是这个下行阶段的阻力区。 要入场可以取个均价83000左右挂限价进场,止损84800。做多的话目前没有建议,资费偏高,追车的人太多,缺一波大洗❗️
👍24❤11😁8🔥7🎉5
Signed Crypto友良
市场定价12 月加息概率从一周前的76%升到86%左右,10 年期美债站上5%以上,2年期也在涨。措辞偏鹰,市场反应却很平静,属于没超出预期吧,已经被提前定价了一部分 之后真正的考验是12月。如果11月CPi继续走高,2027年加 3 次的担心可能会变成现实。
❤8🎉8😁8👍6🔥5
Signed Crypto友良
利率落地维持不变,维持在 3.75%–4%,符合预期,实际要比预期更鹰! 投票:10 比 2。 理事库克和克利夫兰联储主席哈马克投了反对票主张现在就加息。9 月那次加息是 12 比 0 全票通过,这次开始出现分歧,而且分歧是往鹰派方向走。 声明措辞从经济增长从稳健上调为强劲,通胀依然偏高。原来政策有助于通胀回到 2%那句话删了,换成需要更多信息来决定立场。就是把乐观的立场删了
❤12🎉7👍7😁7🔥6
Signed Crypto友良
最近更新没有那么频繁,波动太小,操作也不会有空间,宏观上来说下今天晚上的利率决议吧,目前会还没有开完,说下目前已知的信息
👍11❤8🔥8😁6🎉4
Signed Crypto友良
现在反弹,下跌趋势没有改变,市价81800左右就可以直接进,止损83200上方,前低还是目标❗️
👍28❤9😁9🎉6🔥5🕊2
Signed Crypto友良
最低79700,差了一点点
🔥14😁10👍7❤4🎉4
Signed Crypto友良
短线两个位置,阻力83200,支撑79500,各1500点止损,盈亏比一以上就可以了
👍21🎉7🔥6😁6❤5
Signed Crypto友良
新思路
👍14🔥8🎉7😁5❤3
Signed Crypto友良
前面这两个单子,空单思路不用多说了,都告诉你做多,只有这边告诉你维持震荡,该入场时就入场
😁15👍10🔥8🎉7❤3
Signed Crypto友良
以太坊,2540-2555区间就可以开始做空了,也是同理,虽然反弹,但还是要看震荡区间的破位情况 止损关注2590上方,TP1-2480,TP2-2420,两个持仓波动较大可降低以太的持仓比例❗️
👍20❤10🔥6😁6🎉4
Signed Crypto友良
现有的位置,只要不突破的情况下,这波反弹还是按照震荡的观点去看,突破85800作为止损,因为形态反转了 入场位置关注84200-84600区间,均价84400,目标1是83100,破位后继续看震荡延续,目标2看81500的破位情况~
👍12🔥10🎉7❤5😁5
Signed Crypto友良
这两单,给了很多次机会,正常执行的话,这里的空应该会有两次进场机会,包括以太坊也是,两个TP都完美到达了🚀
😁12🔥10🎉9👍3❤1
Signed Crypto友良
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @btcyouliang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀” (@btcyouliang), 28,056 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcyouliang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.