Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hugo 雨果幣圈財源社區

Channel

Hugo 雨果幣圈財源社區

@MysteriousCamp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,755subscribers

+1,366 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620087432
TypeChannel
Username@MysteriousCamp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MysteriousCamp

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8308,7557,792.57 August 2026 — 7,389 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,389 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,388 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,341 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,329 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,235 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,214 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,149 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,095 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,009 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,970 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,912 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,830 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,755 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1,366. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,541–9,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 02:218,755+1,925
11 Sept 2026, 13:196,830-82
6 Sept 2026, 19:416,912-58
2 Sept 2026, 03:246,970-39
30 Aug 2026, 02:337,009-86
26 Aug 2026, 20:247,095-54
23 Aug 2026, 12:177,149-65
20 Aug 2026, 01:227,214-21
17 Aug 2026, 11:337,235-94
13 Aug 2026, 12:457,329-12
10 Aug 2026, 09:217,341-47
7 Aug 2026, 16:017,388-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:007,389no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:557,389first reading

Engagement

117 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 117 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 41 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4729.9%
4327.4%
👀2012.7%
🕊74.46%
❤‍🔥63.82%
🥰63.82%
🐳53.18%
💋53.18%
🔥42.55%
😁42.55%
🎃31.91%
👌31.91%
🤩21.27%
🎉10.637%
🙏10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC79 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#CHIP 期間回了一次成本,帶保本的朋友是已經損了,現在這個形態我是持續看跌的,留有底倉的朋友繼續持有,目前來看應該會是個千趴

20 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#CHIP 這裏可以手動TP1,有個小支撐,留小倉位搏一搏後面的

🤩2🙏1

20 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC124 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

這波沒跌破0.1880就先減倉獲利,今天不太好做

👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @MysteriousCamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Block
@TheBlock001 · 54,544
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 August 2026
以太坊币圈行情分析频道
@btc18688 · 25,268
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
TMGM币圈分析比特币交易策略🚀
@btcyouliang · 28,837
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
三马哥币圈分析(币安或油管确认)
@sanmage · 30,951
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
比特币飞扬公开频道
@feiyangkanbi · 23,581
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hugo 雨果幣圈財源社區” (@MysteriousCamp), 8,755 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MysteriousCamp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.