Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 金十数据

Channel

金十数据

@jin10data

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,858subscribers

+161 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693268862
TypeChannel
Username@jin10data
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jin10data

Growth

10,69710,86010,778.56 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,704 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,719 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,736 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,734 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,740 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,744 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,770 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,781 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,786 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,790 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,804 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,819 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,821 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,842 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,847 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,839 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,836 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,850 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,854 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,851 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,856 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,860 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,858 subscribers10,8586 August 20262 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net +161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,673–10,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:1710,858-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:3610,860+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:3610,856+5
30 Aug 2026, 20:4410,851-3
29 Aug 2026, 19:5410,854+4
28 Aug 2026, 20:0310,850+14
27 Aug 2026, 21:1710,836-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:5510,839-8
25 Aug 2026, 17:2710,847+5
24 Aug 2026, 18:1610,842+7
23 Aug 2026, 04:1410,835+14
21 Aug 2026, 16:4910,821+2
20 Aug 2026, 18:2710,819+15
19 Aug 2026, 18:4510,804+14
18 Aug 2026, 20:2610,790+4
17 Aug 2026, 22:0210,786+5
16 Aug 2026, 21:4510,781+11
15 Aug 2026, 12:4310,770+14
14 Aug 2026, 00:5710,756+12
12 Aug 2026, 19:4610,744first reading

Engagement

780 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.561%
avg views ÷ 10,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.0
780 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
780
of 780 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 780 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held780 (6 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total47,547
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩228.6%
114.3%
👍114.3%
💯114.3%
😁114.3%
😢114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 780 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 780 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 19:58 UTC10 viewsread 1 September 2026

据伊朗国家电视台:美国袭击导致伊朗锡里克附近一场婚礼至少4人死亡、35人重伤;美国方面暂无立即回应。

1 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC22 viewsread 1 September 2026

据伊朗媒体:几分钟前,德黑兰东部出现防空活动。

1 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC30 viewsread 1 September 2026

伊朗卫生部:霍尔木兹甘省库希斯塔克村遭袭后造成多人死亡,包括一名儿童,另有50多名居民受伤,当地电力和电话服务已中断。

1 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC30 viewsread 1 September 2026

【美债10y升至4.8% 投资者押注美长端收益率继续攀升】金十数据9月2日讯,据外媒报道,交易员正争相对冲美国国债进一步下跌的风险,对预算赤字和通胀的担忧将收益率推至多年高点。值得关注的操作包括:周一出现一笔650万美元的仓位,目标为30年期收益率在11月底前升至5.7%。Nedgroup Investments固定收益主管David Roberts表示,“目前很难看到债券命运的转机,当然,伊朗问题的长期解决方案会有所帮助。”其他周一建立的仓位包括SOFR期权的新风险偏好上行保护,CME未平仓数据显示,这些策略覆盖了10年期收益率在未来几周升至约4.85%、5年期升至4.6%的情景。周二盘中,10年期收益率触及4.8%,为2025年以来最高。分析师表示,债券焦虑可能会持续存在于长端,而非美联储控制的短端。

1 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC34 viewsread 1 September 2026

伊朗最高领袖:伊朗和抵抗阵线给美国敌人留下了难忘的教训。

1 Sept 2026, 19:39 UTC48 viewsread 1 September 2026

据伊朗媒体:胡齐斯坦省安全事务副省长表示,阿瓦士市附近一处地点遭到美国支持的恐怖主义敌人导弹袭击。

1 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC58 viewsread 1 September 2026

美国财政部副部长艾琳·布朗:如果G20财长联合公报无法达成一致,美国将发布一份反映美国优先事项的主席声明。

1 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC60 viewsread 1 September 2026

美国财政部副部长艾琳·布朗:贸易顺差国家和贸易逆差国家在全球失衡带来的挑战问题上存在分歧。

1 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC60 viewsread 1 September 2026

美国财政部副部长艾琳·布朗:各方在主权债务重组以及减少全球失衡相关措辞上仍存在一些分歧。

1 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC60 viewsread 1 September 2026

美国财政部副部长艾琳·布朗:G20国家正在努力制定联合公报,但必须反映美国的利益。

1 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC57 viewsread 1 September 2026

据相关内部备忘录显示,美国银行(BAC.N)安全团队已全面参与配合警方调查,并处理银行办公地点及员工持续面临的安全与安保问题。

1 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC49 viewsread 1 September 2026

伊朗革命卫队:美国的攻击只会让霍尔木兹海峡的封锁更加牢固。

Showing the 12 most recent of 780 posts we hold for @jin10data. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 34,253
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 54,612
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
华尔街日报
@HuaErJie1 · 69,284
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
金色财经
@jinsecaijinpingdao · 247,003
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“金十数据” (@jin10data), 10,858 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jin10data.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.