Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анисимова Анастасия ✨Formagiclife

Channel

Анисимова Анастасия ✨Formagiclife

@ForMagicLife_RU

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

139,270subscribers

-1,978 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342572355
TypeChannel
Username@ForMagicLife_RU
Descriptionпросто волшебница и создатель ЧУДО КЛУБА ✨ Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67692fcc6aa9672b960355de&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ForMagicLife_RU

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

139,270141,248140,2597 August 2026 — 141,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 141,212 subscribers8 August 2026 — 141,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 141,142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 141,059 subscribers11 August 2026 — 141,037 subscribers12 August 2026 — 140,914 subscribers13 August 2026 — 140,844 subscribers15 August 2026 — 140,783 subscribers16 August 2026 — 140,688 subscribers17 August 2026 — 140,588 subscribers18 August 2026 — 140,537 subscribers19 August 2026 — 140,513 subscribers20 August 2026 — 140,438 subscribers21 August 2026 — 140,350 subscribers23 August 2026 — 140,252 subscribers25 August 2026 — 140,151 subscribers26 August 2026 — 140,087 subscribers27 August 2026 — 140,016 subscribers28 August 2026 — 139,951 subscribers28 August 2026 — 139,912 subscribers29 August 2026 — 139,814 subscribers30 August 2026 — 139,783 subscribers31 August 2026 — 139,728 subscribers1 September 2026 — 139,680 subscribers2 September 2026 — 139,529 subscribers4 September 2026 — 139,470 subscribers6 September 2026 — 139,284 subscribers10 September 2026 — 139,270 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -1,978. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138,973–141,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 06:22139,270-14
6 Sept 2026, 21:37139,284-186
4 Sept 2026, 05:01139,470-59
2 Sept 2026, 21:45139,529-151
1 Sept 2026, 17:26139,680-48
31 Aug 2026, 19:35139,728-55
30 Aug 2026, 19:25139,783-31
29 Aug 2026, 22:58139,814-98
28 Aug 2026, 23:29139,912-39
28 Aug 2026, 00:41139,951-65
27 Aug 2026, 01:13140,016-71
26 Aug 2026, 00:11140,087-64
25 Aug 2026, 00:23140,151-101
23 Aug 2026, 13:15140,252-98
21 Aug 2026, 23:36140,350-88
20 Aug 2026, 16:16140,438-75
19 Aug 2026, 18:23140,513-24
18 Aug 2026, 17:12140,537-51
17 Aug 2026, 19:25140,588-100
16 Aug 2026, 17:46140,688first reading

Engagement

217 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.85%
avg views ÷ 139,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,750
178 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
178
of 217 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held217 (6 August 202610 September 2026)
Views total1,202,100
Reactions total83,981
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 04:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,270
Videos
5,520
Links
2,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 01s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

107,384 reactions across 217 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥35,77233.3%
33,06630.8%
😁11,52310.7%
🤣11,04410.3%
👍6,6646.21%
🎉2,9832.78%
🥰2,7702.58%
👏1,6391.53%
🤩1,1441.07%
🤯3510.327%
😱2930.273%
😭1350.126%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 217 of the 217 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107,384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 217 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
42
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 217 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ForMagicLife_RU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 217 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC≈3,940 views281 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Video

11 сентября 06:27 по Москве – новолуние ✨ Бесплатные материалы для вас: 👉 Алгоритм «SOS» для снятия тревоги 👉 Мастер-класс «Исполнение желаний» с рисованием алгоритма «НБР» 👉 Тест «Что мешает вам зарабатывать» 💕 Вступить в Чудо Клуб всегда можно по ссылке 👉 https://kurs.neiromagic.ru/neiromonth?utm_source=chudoclub&utm_medium=tg_calendar ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Практики, которые могут вам пригодиться 💡 💜Заявление вселенн

🔥15883🥰20👏12🎉5👍2🤩1

10 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈4,730 views77 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

💭 «Прорыдала весь эфир» — поделилась с нами Наталья после арт-расстановки «Разрешение себе быть любимой» ❤️ Арт-расстановки могут пробудить и помочь прожить самые скрытые чувства. Смотрите, что пишут другие волшебницы 👇 💭 «Самое интересное, что в жизни у нас так и есть» 💭 «Все мои треугольники ниже линии. Видимо, всех должников я уже простила. А сама всё ещё в долгах…» 💭 «Я просто в шоке, какую точную диагностику

🔥4928

10 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC≈5,360 views102 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Voice message

📣 Отвечаем на ваши вопросы! На связи команда. Дорогие волшебницы, Ксения Березкина записала подкаст с ответами на ваши вопросы ✨ На некоторые из них мы ответили ниже текстом 👌 В подкасте вы узнаете: – кому нужно покупать комбо-набор расстановок – что делаем в арт-расстановках «Спокойное возвращение долгов» и «Разрешение себе быть любимой» – как и когда пройдет арт-расстановка «Страх остаться без еды», а также о че

69🔥24😁5👍2🤩1🤯1

10 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC≈6,050 views163 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

У нас шикарная идея к новолунию ✨ Привет, дорогие волшебницы, на связи команда Насти 💕 Только 3 дня — 10, 11 и 12 сентября в продаже СУПЕР КОМБО 🔥 Набор из 2-х арт-расстановок на тему денег и отношений с крутейшим бонусом 🚀 Вы знаете, что новолуние — идеальное время для начала чего-то нового, загадывания и исполнения желаний! И оно уже завтра 👌 Набор может стать вашим первым шагом ✨ В наборе 2 арт-расстановки:

🔥10150👏9🤣3

9 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC≈7,190 views500 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026
Video

10 сентября – Убывающая луна 🌖 ✨ Бесплатные материалы для вас: 👉 Алгоритм «SOS» для снятия тревоги 👉 Мастер-класс «Исполнение желаний» с рисованием алгоритма «НБР» 👉 Тест «Что мешает вам зарабатывать» 💕 Вступить в Чудо Клуб всегда можно по ссылке 👉 https://kurs.neiromagic.ru/neiromonth?utm_source=chudoclub&utm_medium=tg_calendar ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Практики, которые могут вам пригодиться 💡 ⭕️Практика «Радикальное прощ

🔥299136👍59🤩6

9 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,830 views553 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Настя, благодарю за всё! Курс просто восторг, а на эфиры хожу на свидание с тобой! Это мое запускающее действие! Пусть тема исполнится наилучшим образом! Очень хочу создавать интерьеры по всей России, на радость людям!

🔥356126🤩36👏23👍12

9 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,310 views623 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Теперь мы ее так и будем называть 😂 Жизненная энергия Е Бань Ци

🤣355🔥141😁65👏3016🤩9👍7

9 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈6,480 views577 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Я признаю и принимаю свою энергию Е Бань Ци

😁277🔥136🤣11624👍14👏10

9 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC≈6,350 views607 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня мы открыли свои сильные стороны ✨🎉

🔥416116👍58🤩15🎉2

9 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈6,640 views886 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Сложнее всего было делать вид, что я без е*анцы 😂 И прогибаться под чужие ожидания ! И сейчас я счастлива, что я свободна делать то, что хочу ! Но стоило мне это не мало …

🔥492👏148119😁57🤣26🥰23👍19🎉2

9 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈6,660 views102 reactionsread 11 September 2026

интересно, что здесь было сложнее — решиться на этот шаг или потом не откатываться назад к прежним ожиданиям?

👍6438

9 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC≈6,760 views1,178 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Это называется саморегуляция ! Мне никто и никогда НЕ ЗАПРЕЩАЛ выкладывать техники ! Мне намекали, что это слишком эзотерично и недостойно профессионала ! В то время, я должна была соответствовать высокому статусу инструктора Нейрографики, были претензии к эзотерике от депутатов и вообще всех … А сейчас я решила, что я официально разрешаю себе быть странненькой художницей ! С е*анцой ! Извините 😁🙏🏻 Это мой стиль, ви

🔥624😁260👍11381🤣55🎉28👏17

Showing the 12 most recent of 217 posts we hold for @ForMagicLife_RU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анисимова Анастасия ✨Formagiclife” (@ForMagicLife_RU), 139,270 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForMagicLife_RU.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.