Channel
استراتيجية فرصة
@Forsah500
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,739subscribers
+59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001121910871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forsah500 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forsah500 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 6,739 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 6,737 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 6,747 | +37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 6,710 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 6,717 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 6,706 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 6,691 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 6,691 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 6,693 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 6,682 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 6,677 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 6,672 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 6,673 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 6,674 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 6,680 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@businessma7room · 47,462
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
@AskJusur · 28,928
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@fahad_ali_alshehri · 51,842
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@AL1000A · 49,539
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@FAHAD_GAMMA1 · 42,864
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
@matches_today2 · 60,493
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
@alkhmaisIN · 35,860
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
@sok191bo · 30,298
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@SPLHD · 193,387
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@SPL_3G · 147,803
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
@Tagme3a · 133,640
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@matagrcom · 24,687
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@KFU_D · 24,265
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@mutdawel · 49,341
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@MGTSPX · 50,426
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
@SPL4K · 29,474
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
@SmartStrategy_Trader · 24,389
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026
@mrz_s1 · 63,733
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@iAhmedMoh · 34,009
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
@Forex_Star · 45,847
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@adelacademy · 89,721
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
@mk77ii · 79,493
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@generaleducation · 30,510
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@RqZPx3_2lrepS753 · 29,078
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“استراتيجية فرصة” (@Forsah500), 6,739 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forsah500.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.