https://x.com/shukriim/status/2114070524254896546

Channel
إسماعيل الشكري
@mutdawel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,687subscribers
-1,150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182438590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mutdawel |
| Description | تحليل الأسهم السعودية بالفيديو باستخدام إستراتيجيات بسيطة لنشر الوعي الفني لدى المتداولين |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mutdawel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:41 | 48,687 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 48,709 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 48,720 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 48,718 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 48,727 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 48,745 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 48,756 | -28 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:47 | 48,784 | -26 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 48,810 | -25 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 48,835 | -48 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 48,883 | -38 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 48,921 | -79 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 49,000 | -81 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 49,081 | -77 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 49,158 | -183 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 49,341 | -19 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 49,360 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 49,377 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 49,396 | +7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 49,389 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 14 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.5%
- avg views ÷ 48,687 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,000
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (14 August 2025 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 50,020 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈180
- Videos
- ≈34
- Links
- ≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 39s
- Average length
- 1m 50s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
ألف مبروك فوز منتخبنا الوطني ببطولة #كاس_الخليج نبارك للجميع هذا المنتخب المتجدد وعقبال كأس آسيا
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
يسألني الكثير من المتابعين الأفاضل عن غيابي الذي طال ؟؟! أحياناً يكون الغياب عن الساحة أكثر فائدة شخصية من الحضور فيها. ابتعدت فترة، ليس لعدم وجود ما أقدمه ، ولكن لأن المشهد قد تغيّر كثيراً ؟! فبالرغم من وجود بعض الأساتذة المميزين الذي أثروا الساحة بعلمهم ، كثرت الأصوات ، واختلط التحليل بالاستعراض ، وأصبح لبثوث التكتوك وأصحاب المساحات حضور يفوق أحياناً حضور المعرفة والخبرة. فضّلت أن أراقب من بعيد ، وأحافظ على منهج…
Photo, posted without a caption
https://x.com/i/status/2039446271975432695
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
https://x.com/shukriim/status/1990135818418078024?t=HQ7N62qiaqVIyIk0ybdLfg&s=35
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @mutdawel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ezzo_khrais · 38,949#1
@vip_2000_vip · 19,673#2
@Forex_Star · 44,991#3
@khairanalkhayari · 7,246#4
@chart511 · 5,425#5
@khhr88 · 10,455#6
@Abomazenbpt · 8,818#7
@charta_swaji · 13,006#8
@Haneen444444 · 6,428#9
@sauditrede · 9,243#10
@almogheri · 3,832#11
@turki1555 · 13,651#12
@Tadawul_1 · 11,925#13
@wiki_2030 · 14,035#14
@saudiser · 11,724#15
@faisal487 · 6,480#16
@Sa7atTadawul · 46,059#17
@Raakaan_7007 · 5,992#18
@argaam_ksa · 17,163#19
@abumadeleine · 3,352#20
@alhawamir · 8,781#21
@S3Dwave · 8,807#22
@albashrish · 14,075#23
@AboAbdullah91822 · 6,804#24
@p123abs · 10,619#25
@ChartPort · 6,333#26
@fn_HARONIC_WOOLF · 4,277#27
@RqZPx3_2lrepS753 · 28,469#28
@TickerFlash · 9,655#29
@Bassam_AlObaid · 6,058#30
@wiki_Dji · 7,601#31
@mohammad1071234 · 4,308#32
@Dow_Star · 15,176#33
@alshartalfani · 2,710#34
@A_1_a_A_1_a_A · 7,403#35
@KO_R17 · 30,130#36
@kaser1441 · 10,001#37
@shamakh0 · 5,905#38
@KHOBAR2000_1 · 2,850#39
@dahom1993 · 3,098#40
@Rackets08 · 5,293#41
@II1II_II1II · 9,342#42
@Forsah500 · 6,721#43
@mahmoudsaadjooker · 2,157#44
@abunjooood · 29,932#45
@Hasanmassoud · 1,380#46
@almahtraf · 3,170 (as read 25 August 2026)#47
@OptionsAbuAhmed · 20,984#48
@alfaisal_c · 2,286#49
@Hdwj5s3uIZiNjM8 · 2,314#50
@adelmzyad · 8,726#51
@labeehksa · 3,454#52
@alehtrafiah · 772#53
@professorchart · 5,416#54
@cryptomena1 · 103,450#55
@az_vip1 · 3,450#56
@numerixanalasis21 · 1,616#57
@FutrueGlimpsee · 12,566#58
@tadawulReport · 9,458#59
@MGTSPX · 49,892#60
@aborashedTAC2030 · 505#61
@optionart · 16,329#62
@aboyousef_Digichart · 11,692#63
@ssaaeedd91 · 36,680#64
@chart62 · 936#65
@ll2020ll20 · 3,565#66
@abo_shaqran · 10,649#67
@abosalmanchart · 1,313#68
@FAHAD_GAMMA1 · 679#69
@TriplePower1 · 706#70
@basatatchart · 1,106 (as read 25 August 2026)#71
@abo3aysha · 1,788#72
@SmartStrategy_Trader · 24,271#73
@dream_vu · 122,810#74
@OPTION_Xn · 9,035#75
@businessma7room · 46,680#76
@spark_Option · 5,840#77
@gulf_chemicals · 3,778#78
@wzirUSD · 8,595#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@instituteMEC · 24,328
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
@ssaaeedd91 · 36,680
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
@Free5courses · 24,857
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@Forex_Star · 44,991
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@mrz_s1 · 62,287
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@ezzo_khrais · 38,949
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
@Sa7atTadawul · 46,059
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
@vip_2000_vip · 19,673
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
@matagrcom · 24,212
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@alkhmaisIN · 35,252
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
@adelacademy · 88,693
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
@Talal92me · 99,987
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@s_eulim · 96,739
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@RqZPx3_2lrepS753 · 28,469
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
@SalmaAlrehaely · 160,899
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Sptboy · 19,369
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 September 2026
@abunjooood · 29,932
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@RSLHD · 101,362
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 August 2026
@AL1000A · 49,330
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@fahad_ali_alshehri · 51,547
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@Accooounting · 41,398
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@Techpills · 66,233
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
@KSA_HR · 21,984
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
@grobksa · 76,446
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إسماعيل الشكري” (@mutdawel), 48,687 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutdawel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.