Channel
@Ghasham22
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
138,497subscribers
-7,643 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001219107114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ghasham22 |
| Description | منصة أ.غشام التعليمية 👩🏻💻👨💻 🌐 https://ghasham1.com/ كل ما تحتاجه لاختبار التحصيلي 💯📚 💬 قروب المناقشة @Ghasham222 📝 قناة التدريبات @Ghasham2222 📊 قناة الكويزات @Ghasham22223 ✨ قناة التجارب @Ghasham2223 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ghasham22 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 138,497 | -467 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 138,964 | -250 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 139,214 | -221 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:53 | 139,435 | -252 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 139,687 | -169 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 139,856 | -290 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 140,146 | -214 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 140,360 | -155 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 140,515 | -230 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 140,745 | -188 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 140,933 | -383 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 141,316 | -617 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 141,933 | -571 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 142,504 | -332 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 142,836 | -308 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 143,144 | -156 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 143,300 | -325 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 143,625 | -270 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 143,895 | -294 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 144,189 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
270 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 259 | 95.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.11% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اقول الله يبيض وجهك يا استاذ غشام ويجمل حالك استاذ غشام فيه حاجه فرقت معي كثيير اللي هي رسايل التحفيز والكلام اللي يبرد القلب سواء قبل الاختبار او بعده شكرا لكل من تعب في هذي التحفه الفنيه والقوه العلميه منصة استاذ غشام اخيرا حاب اطمن الدفعه اللي جايه الفتره الثانيه كان عندي فوق العشرين غلط وازيدك من الشعر بيت كان فيه منها اسئلة كثيير سهله عينوا خير اذكروا ربكم وسلام عليكم ❤️🙌
❤48👍3
فرحن🐎🐎
❤9
موووو عارفه أوصف مشاعري حاليييياااا بس الحمد لله دايماً الحمدلله ان اللهمني الصواب والحمدلله انه اللهمني ادخل مع الاستاذ غشام شكراً لك شكراً الدوره مره فادتني وخلتني اثبت كل شيء ذاكرته وبمده قصيره جداً يعطيك العافيه مو عارفه كيف أوصف مشاعري بسسس شكرااااً😭😭💗💗💗💗💗💗
❤22
الشكر مايوفي مجهوداتك معنا الله يعطيك ألف عافيه وباذن الله ما انساك من دعواتي ( أغلاطي بالأولى ٧ والثانيه ١٥ )
❤12
ياشيخ ليتني عرفتكم من السنه الي طافت وماقعدت قاب يير شككككررررًا لكم 🩷🩷🩷🩷
استاذ غشام يعلم الله اعتمدت عليك بين فترتين واستفدت الكثير وخاصتًا شمولية التأسيس فيه اسئلة كثييرة جديده ماحصلتها الا بالتأسيس ماقصرت معنا الله يسعدك ويوفقك
❤9
ماشاء الله تبارك الله
❤6
هذا من فضل ربي، الحمدلله 🤲🤲
❤15
الحمدلله الحمدلله 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕
❤22🙏2
والله التاسيس قوي جدا وفي اضافات مو عند احد واضافات قوية بناء على المنهج انصح به بكل قوة
❤19⚡3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9
ارتفعت درجتي بين الفترتين بسبب اني ذاكرت تجميعات غشام
❤24
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Ghasham22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحصيلي أ.غشام” (@Ghasham22), 138,497 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ghasham22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.