كروبــ كآرفت آلمـشـآهير🐺🔥 كروبــ مـحـترم آلونسـه🕊❤️ مـ نريد كرنج ـ نريد وآعين مـرتبــين 🥺↗️ دآخل تونسـ وغـير روتين 😊↗️ هلآوسـهلآ بــكل مـن يدخـل 🤭🫡 - رابط المجموعه : 𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐒 𝐄𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐑𝐄 — — — — — — — — — — https://t.me/+4kjyNArCDO1iZWIy

Channel
صور منوعة♡متحركة Gif♡
@Gif2022am
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,533subscribers
-2,947 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001317804390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gif2022am |
| Description | 💝متحركة 2024 Gif💖 -بوت حماية @Merro1bot @aemn121bot فروله -السورس: @meroteam - مصنع حماية @Mrrmkbot @noor_tm لطلب التمويل تواصل المحظورين @Nonaybot الاثبات والثقه : @tamweelnoor 𝘿𝙀𝙑: @ameer_Dev |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gif2022am |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:10 | 43,533 | -41 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:55 | 43,574 | -40 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:46 | 43,614 | -29 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:49 | 43,643 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 43,655 | -45 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 43,700 | -25 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 43,725 | -33 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 43,758 | -25 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 43,783 | -25 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 43,808 | -38 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 43,846 | -19 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 43,865 | -29 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 43,894 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 43,909 | -26 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 43,935 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 43,961 | -41 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 44,002 | -38 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 44,040 | -30 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 44,070 | -33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 44,103 | first reading |
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 11 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.858%
- avg views ÷ 43,533 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 373
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (11 October 2024 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بلشت لعبة التقييم اصعد اسمع التعليقات تموت ضحك😂😂😂🤣🤣
https://t.me/+e2P3bHEHdMplNzhi كروب ام عسوله ترند بل تلي1#كروب محترم وكلي فقرات وألعاب تجنن دخلو ام عسوله فاتحي تصال راح تلعب لعبت السرع دخلو وصعدو بل تصال ام عسوله كروبه فول دخلو قبل الحذف❤️🔥✔️ 👇👇👇❤️🔥✔️ عمري محتار وين تروح ؟ وضايج تعال هنا ثبت ويانا خلي توحيدنا وتعرف ع ناس جدد كليوم تمويل ونسه فول 💞⭐️ https://t.me/eu_uki https://t.me/+e2P3bHEHdMplNzhi
انس ابو النسوان يريدكم تعالو 🙂↔️😂😂😂🏃♀🏃♀🏃♀🏃♀
😻❤️🔥زوزو ال علي اني سويت كروب 🔥😻😘خاص بيه واتمنى 😻🔥دخلون 🔥❤️بيه تنورني يلا بنات طبو تفاعلو وصعدكم بكروبي مشرفين 😻🔥❤️ https://t.me/+acwCVqKvhAEwNzky
سهران و ضايج ؟ وكاعد لهسه 🙄🐸 تعال تونس و سولف بلكروب فاتحين اتصال ونسه لصبح😻💖 https://t.me/+B9BcQy5wanxlZGEy
زنوبة تريد تزوج 😂😂🙊وصتني تريد شباب صاكين بكروبهه🙈🧐🧐
يلُِهـ آلُِڪلُِ يدِخـلُِ 😍ڪرووبَ بَس حٍتيت 🥰 خـلُِيڪ مثقٌفُ بَدِوون مشُآڪلُِ يحٍتآجٍوون مشُرفات ومشرفين متفُآعٍلُِين دِخـلُِ توونس ڪروبنا😘😍 https://t.me/+3DIS7WU4HZs2Mjg0
نوشة ورهف ولولو تريدكم بالاتصال 🥰🥰🙈🙈🏃♀🏃♀
ضايج😒 ودور ونسه 🤭يمي 😌ادخل للكروب ونطي مشاركه للرابط 😉 احله لمه شباب وبنات كيوت😍❤️💋 https://t.me/+HCz8sdTNqVk1NzAy
ضايج😒 ودور ونسه 🤭يمي 😌ادخل للكروب ونطي مشاركه للرابط 😉 احله لمه شباب وبنات كيوت😍❤️💋 https://t.me/+RCIfAvfiUps0Zjhi
اليوم مشتددة بالاتصال 🔥🔥🔥زينب ورند مسويات مسابقة من رصيدد اصعدوو
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @Gif2022am. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @Gif2022am as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 24 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Gif2022am named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 3 October 2026 – 3 October 2026 · confirmed gone 10 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@llllahll · 124,564#1
@hwjeki · 914,763#2
@lvv_me · 28,847#3
@TJ_H5 · 72,428#4
@F3BBF · 88,310#5
@PP_02 · 1,030,352#6
@zz_2b · 853,293#7
@zx_n7 · 969,112 (as read 27 August 2026)#8
@iT64i · 78,999#9
@llllOOlllllO · 8,323#10
@F8FFl · 1,336,822#11
@za_cvj · 1,493#12
@pp_35 · 271,436#13
@hooy_10 · 1,425#14
@FF_G4 · 4,976#15
@HeB1H1 · 92,157#16
@QQQmmma · 5,077#17
@C0CUO · 454#18
@l6_lrs · 230#19
@ss_zz_sa · 4,327#20
@tt9et · 303#21
@SU_OP · 14,889#22
@d_q_y2 · 360#23
@thaertk · 532#24
@srwns · 2,465#25
@EFSBOS · 105,972#26
@AO_5Q · 424 (as read 27 August 2026)#27
@gog788 · 95,705#28
@B_a_r · 178,699#29
@zzzzzz · 2,011,976#30
@ilji7 · 1,471#31
@entcxn · 2,304#32
@XQ_85 · 135,432#33
@A_H_A64 · 1,403#34
@PPPJP · 3,186,857#35
@one_news2026 · 91,225#36
@IHOII · 12,575#37
@MQ_XO · 63,789#38
@zrzzzz · 1,425,308#39
@iraqed4 · 3,197,089#40
@errzzl · 478,322#41
@PPPPJ · 2,319,206#42
@iraqedu · 4,755,657#43
@EFACTO_12 · 1,673#44
@V_8_T4 · 1,462#45
@M_UI_M · 818#46
@Bs_Bu · 288#47
@YYYYD · 1,631,121#48
@XG_64 · 6#49
@V_1_V_7 · 2,679#50
@u2ssa · 1,309#51
@XJ_93 · 7,010#52
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ssnc5 · 36,954
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 29 August 2026
@nKnnn · 2,195,912
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 August 2026
@B_a_r · 178,699
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 13 August 2026
@HRRRRis · 152,642
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
@kx_e3 · 150,916
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
@NNNZN · 1,338,680
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 August 2026
@KKK9K · 133,785
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
@YYYXY · 1,039,906
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 September 2026
@l8_lI · 38,398
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 1 September 2026
@P_8_D · 63,110
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 22 August 2026
@TNTNC · 38,938
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 30 August 2026
@en_wk · 973,566
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
@FxEFF · 56,059
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 7 September 2026
@zzzxz · 1,018,239
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
@O8_22 · 119,030
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@zzuzzz · 140,473
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
@TT_BNW · 53,966
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 23 August 2026
@lvv_me · 28,847
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 8 September 2026
@mmmsc · 107,516
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
@F8FFl · 1,336,822
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 15 August 2026
@O5_6D · 233,205
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@F3BBF · 88,310
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
@llllahll · 124,564
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
@zzzazz · 200,294
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 99 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صور منوعة♡متحركة Gif♡” (@Gif2022am), 43,533 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gif2022am.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.