دش الوناسه يم باريس وبس 💋

Channel
اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •
@YYYYD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,677,270subscribers
-37,909 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001302275706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YYYYD |
| Description | [+] لطلب تمويل القنوات : @xxx1x [+] قناة التمويلات : @nnnon |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YYYYD |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 1,677,270 | -3,069 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 1,680,339 | -3,056 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 1,683,395 | -2,711 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 1,686,106 | -3,454 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 1,689,560 | -5,316 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 1,694,876 | -3,357 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 1,698,233 | -1,152 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 1,699,385 | -1,020 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 1,700,405 | -509 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 1,700,914 | -510 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 1,701,424 | -199 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 1,701,623 | +168 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 1,701,455 | +386 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 1,701,069 | +312 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 1,700,757 | -948 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,701,705 | -591 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,702,296 | -1,315 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 1,703,611 | -1,373 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1,704,984 | -1,097 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 1,706,081 | first reading |
Engagement
5,259 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.14%
- avg views ÷ 1,677,270 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,350
- 3,238 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3,238
- of 5,259 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3,238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5,259 (9 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,597,745 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,030
- Links
- ≈68
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 3,162 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 8 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3 days of being posted; a typical post has already reached 9.39% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 40.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 13,200 views — 0.787% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 16,920).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /26921819 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC | 13 minutes – 3 minutes old | 63 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26921719 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC | 15 minutes – 5 minutes old | 65 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26921619 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTC | 110 minutes – 10 minutes old | 276 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26921319 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC | 219 minutes – 35 minutes old | 733 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /26921219 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC | 223 minutes – 39 minutes old | 1,000 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 23 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /26921119 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC | 223 minutes – 39 minutes old | 731 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 23 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /26920819 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC | 14 minutes – 4 minutes old | 108 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26920719 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC | 15 minutes – 5 minutes old | 986 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+1IqojsSzNl45ZjA0
اول واحد يجي ننطي بوسه
https://t.me/+lCp1_bX2MY03ZjU6
خالو ناز يريدكم -دونت مشاكل 🍒 -دونت عوائل 🍒 وناسه لأكثر 🍒 دش وتونس🍒
https://t.me/+QsNayMIbdGE2NGJh
لي ثابت ينقط محتاجين مشرفين 🗡
https://t.me/+9zGPrsj5sUoyMjUy
الله يسهل هاي الايام علينا ويارب نشوف نفسنا بحضن الايام اللي دنعيش علمودها
"انتَ دَتحاول " ورب العالمين دَيشوف وهالشيء كُلش كافي .
صباح الخير حلوة الناس اللي تبقى منبهرة بيك رغم انت صرت باهت
السعادة بتحلي ملامح الإنسان اللّٰه يسعدنا السعادة اللي تحلينا وتنورنا 🐱
Showing the 12 most recent of 5,259 posts we hold for @YYYYD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@YYYYD edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@nl3lln · 111,71928 postsكروب+انمي+اوتاكو🎌
@h1_Vy · 43,1239 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 18,7266 postsكروبات بنات وشباب تعارف دردشه
@AG_Im · 87,0265 postsكروب انمي اوتاكو راقيين 🍂
@AnimeShtpostr · 12,8905 postsاقتباسات واغاني - ShoK
@IllBlll · 58,6985 postsكروبات ونسه درشه بنات تعارف بس ولد
@ZU_A3 · 22,1014 postsكروب تعارف شباب وبنات
@bbu_ghc67 · 2,6263 postsاقتباسات ، عبارات ، خواطر ، كبرياء ، غرور ،
@Eljoker464 · 57,1223 postsOTAKU
@GroupAnimeEvo · 5,5643 postsرابط انجل#1
@LlNKAnGeL · 3,0973 postsكروب مكالمات جماعيه
@YYYYYS5 · 12,4403 postsbleedng
@bleedng · 22 postsكـُن أنـتَ .
@c780o · 672 postsروح
@ci2rrr · 14,1822 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 114,1942 postsأثَــر
@LinkLiZni · 5462 postsNOVA
@Philosophmp · 5,5882 postsسُكر و لوزِ 🪐
@pin_cm · 1,4842 postsراقيين فقط
@rae7en · 7,5372 postsStylAi - ستايلي
@stylai_iraq · 1,3652 posts𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐍
@TTNNTNT · 7,4942 posts01 PlatForm - منصة 01
@D666N · 5631 postSUN🌓MOON
@marhar2922 · 8,2221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 4
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@YYYYD named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 28 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026 · confirmed gone 15 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PPPJP · 3,208,272#1
@PPPPJ · 2,330,076#2
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602#3
@zrzzzz · 1,426,469#4
@nnKnn · 1,264,389#5
@deved_iraq · 119,837#6
@llllahll · 118,437#7
@iXiiii · 68,875#8
@voovvo · 69,552#9
@HeB1H1 · 98,336#10
@shabohte · 10,080#11
@oooorooi · 5,868#12
@LLU63 · 19,211#13
@NNNZN · 1,187,169#14
@xoHox · 2,553 (as read 8 August 2026)#15
@hwjeki · 984,781#16
@zx_e4 · 938,248 (as read 8 August 2026)#17
@iii6b · 52,454#18
@nnnnan · 96,791#19
@TJ_H5 · 75,580#20
@iraqed4 · 3,333,171#21
@iraqedu · 4,431,987#22
@lAlMosahfl · 776,377#23
@mlazemna · 1,044,735#24
@L9L9L · 77,085#25
@iT64i · 75,620#26
@Edu211 · 652,328#27
@RN24_IQ · 225,550#28
@errzzl · 535,835#29
@z12zxi · 232,945#30
@XG_64 · 34,406#31
@v999v · 1,574,082#32
@iiPiii · 54,670#33
@santer_sads · 370,099#34
@one_news2026 · 95,802#35
@soi17 · 473,196#36
@TeslaAws · 301,129#37
@edu2iq · 1,181,015#38
@Newton1998 · 387,583#39
@U_1_20 · 1,380#40
@HHHB50H · 50,155#41
@llquraanll · 248,297#42
@alnahraintv · 26,798#43
@SadsHelp · 1,020,431#44
@k4kkk · 335,340#45
@HH_H7S · 275,231#46
@Medical_cours1 · 721,406#47
@hmd2m · 10,482#48
@V_1_V_7 · 2,837#49
@SabrenNewss · 1,101,970#50
@iqresults · 653,413#51
@ntnrr · 17#52
@haiderwaleed · 452,905#53
@Gif2022am · 45,032#54
@B_a_r · 158,227#55
@MemesRaqen · 27,430#56
@educationiq · 612,102#57
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iXiiii · 68,875
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
@zzzqz · 92,225
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
@KKXXFK · 45,387
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
@KK_211 · 152,875
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@PPPJP · 3,208,272
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@dilekrz1 · 44,462
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
@xmoaml · 136,619
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@PPPPJ · 2,330,076
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
@FCB10Le · 109,808
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@op_35 · 301,095
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@NNNZN · 1,187,169
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 August 2026
@cccpck · 104,754
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
@HJAYATT · 487,465
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 9 August 2026
@zrzzzz · 1,426,469
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@HRRRRis · 157,514
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
@NlNNN · 2,080,164
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@nnnnan · 96,791
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@zzuzz · 866,450
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@zzzzzz · 2,011,602
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@mmmsc · 108,149
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
@nnKnn · 1,264,389
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 August 2026
@amalzos21 · 271,903
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 August 2026
@PVVVV · 813,726
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 August 2026
@pJVJJJJ · 97,488
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 146 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •” (@YYYYD), 1,677,270 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YYYYD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.