Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
- Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
- 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
- shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
- Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @lAlMosahfl — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Engagement
1,197 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.31%
- avg views ÷ 775,228 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41,200
- 981 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 981
- of 1,197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 429 of 981 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1,304
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 411
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 41%
- Most on one post
- 101
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lAlMosahfl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 August 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
11 Sept 2026, 02:29 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 11 September 2026 Photo
رسالة لقلبك : مَهما تعاظمت الهموم وثقُلت الأيام، يهونها الله💛
11 Sept 2026, 01:17 UTC≈9,810 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 صلاة الفجر🤍.
الربُّ الذي تقولُ له ناصيتي بيدك أتظنه يتركك
11 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC≈10,600 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 Voice message
﴿وَيَهْدِي مَن يَشَاء إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ﴾🤍
11 Sept 2026, 00:02 UTC≈14,400 viewsread 11 September 2026 ﴿يأتِ بِها اللهُ إنَ اللهَ لَطيفٌ خَبير ﴾.
10 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC≈17,100 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 ﴿رَبَّنا وَلا تُحَمِّلنا ما لا طاقَةَ لَنا بِهِ﴾.
10 Sept 2026, 23:04 UTC≈19,800 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 ﴿وَمَن يَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى اللَّهِ فَهُوَ حَسْبُهُ﴾
10 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC≈23,400 views0 reactions3 Starsread 11 September 2026 ﴿فَرِحِينَ بِمَا آتَاهُمُ اللَّهُ مِنْ فَضْلِهِ﴾
10 Sept 2026, 22:00 UTC≈28,300 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
10 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC≈33,500 views0 reactions2 Starsread 11 September 2026 Voice message
اللهم اجعل القرآن ربيع قلوبنا❤️.
10 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC≈34,900 views0 reactions2 Starsread 11 September 2026 ما لا يُنالُ بالأسباب يُنال بالدُعاء.
10 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC≈36,600 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 September 2026 “الامور المتروكة لله .. مضمونة.
10 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC≈38,300 views0 reactions2 Starsread 11 September 2026 ضَع شكواكَ في سَجدة وأَطمَئِن
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,197 posts we hold for @lAlMosahfl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
افتارات اغاني كروبات عاشكها
@PPPPJ · 2,338,556#5 اقتباسات حب ، عبارات حزينه ، ستوريات 🖤 .
@zzzzzz · 1,946,706#11 تعَىٰ نشرب سِيجاره
@szovl · 12,104#18 نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,394,596#24 اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات 0:0
@PPPJP · 3,218,085#29 نيمار ابن الانبار iraqedu
@v999v · 1,548,975#39 شبكة المساعد التعليمية
@SadsHelp · 1,027,729#46 The Medical Family - العائلة الطبية
@MydoctorA96 · 189,587#49 اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •
@YYYYD · 1,689,560#50 المنقذ في الأنكليزي || أ.محمد العبيدي
@dr_English1 · 323,154#51 - my reFuGe .
@LLU63 · 19,786#52 قناة الهيتي للتميز🩺
@xd6xd6 · 167,248#55 Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,675#57 قناة طلاب العراق الرسمية
@soi17 · 464,840#65 Memes ميمز دمعة جلب
@iiPiii · 54,388#70 Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
إنسان من عصر آخر
@Gareeb9898 · 41,993
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026 𝙳𝚞𝚋𝚘𝚟
@Dubovdu · 32,852
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026 𝐀 𝐌 𝐎 𝐔 𝐑 𝐘.𝟗𝟏 •🕰
@amoury1991 · 34,173
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026 رسائل منٓ القران .
@rrrr7w · 36,905
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 September 2026 القرأن طريقي🤎🍂
@MV0MV · 39,811
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026 ليطمئن قلبك ♡.
@AY_MN1 · 41,830
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026 المصحف
@almushaf4 · 43,267
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026 طريقنا الى الجنة🤍
@jgjj2 · 45,147
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026 أَلا بِذِكرِ اللَّهِ تَطمَئِنُّ القُلوبُ
@AlQuran_l · 45,013
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026 الامام الحسين{ع}ستوريات حسينيه
@Q3QQR · 48,956
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026 بالقـرأن نـرتـقـي
@l11ll · 50,612
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026 شي مرَّة فكَّرت ؟💙🌙
@dayszahraa1 · 72,279
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026 مقالات أنسان مريض
@iliiiii0 · 108,970
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026 عُمر عبدألسّلام
@deved_iraq · 120,271
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026 ادعيه،اذكار،خواطر،القرآن الكريم.
@EO_30 · 192,178
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026 القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,296
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026 رسائل من القران
@X_i_E · 28,940
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 9 September 2026 أطمئنآن
@ll0UII · 29,393
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026 م . مؤمـل الزُبيـدي 📊🔱
@se_pm · 30,940
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 6 September 2026 متكلمنيش
@fajer87 · 31,093
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026 اندي
@anoudy9 · 31,731
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026 Repost
@viiiivil · 33,798
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026 Fact
@f0ctt · 31,622
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026 ملجا الامان
@Z1XZ11 · 33,036
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 September 2026 This channel appears in 455 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المُصْحَف” (@lAlMosahfl), 775,228 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lAlMosahfl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
