Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Memes

Channel

Memes

@memesxx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,537subscribers

-483 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063613091
TypeChannel
Username@memesxx
Created25 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/memesxx

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,53724,02023,778.55 August 2026 — 24,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,019 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,011 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,001 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,992 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,983 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,982 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,992 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,991 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,997 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,984 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,978 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,944 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,941 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,933 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,917 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,900 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,922 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,918 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,917 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,906 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,896 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,889 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,883 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,880 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,876 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,870 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,876 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,926 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,899 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,892 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,869 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,860 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,844 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,774 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,719 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,675 subscribers12 October 2026 — 23,651 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,641 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,630 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,621 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,617 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,614 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,611 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,609 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,598 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,591 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,587 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,582 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,583 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,571 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,564 subscribers28 October 2026 — 23,562 subscribers29 October 2026 — 23,560 subscribers30 October 2026 — 23,549 subscribers31 October 2026 — 23,548 subscribers1 November 2026 — 23,553 subscribers2 November 2026 — 23,542 subscribers3 November 2026 — 23,537 subscribers5 August 20263 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net -483. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,465–24,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 16:1923,537-5
2 Nov 2026, 17:3623,542-11
1 Nov 2026, 15:0623,553+5
31 Oct 2026, 14:4023,548-1
30 Oct 2026, 17:4923,549-11
29 Oct 2026, 21:0123,560-2
28 Oct 2026, 23:1423,562-2
27 Oct 2026, 23:1023,564-7
27 Oct 2026, 00:4523,571-12
26 Oct 2026, 02:3823,583+1
25 Oct 2026, 05:5923,582-5
24 Oct 2026, 08:2723,587-4
23 Oct 2026, 11:3623,591-7
21 Oct 2026, 06:5023,598-11
20 Oct 2026, 05:4123,609-2
19 Oct 2026, 08:0523,611-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:4123,614-3
17 Oct 2026, 11:1823,617-4
16 Oct 2026, 10:2023,621-9
15 Oct 2026, 12:1023,630first reading

Engagement

248 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 23,537 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 248 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held248 (2 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total217,880
Reactions total5,647
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16,830 reactions across 246 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7,93147.1%
😭5,42632.2%
😢1,4438.57%
🤬5573.31%
💘4892.91%
👏4542.70%
🫡2351.40%
🔥1931.15%
😈1020.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 248 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,903 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
277
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 248 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @memesxx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 248 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,140 views59 reactions20 Starsread 3 November 2026

بالدراسة صفر بالعشگ صفر بس بالحزن حسرة من حسرة

😭34🤣21😢3🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,900 views25 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣15😭9🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,850 views33 reactionsread 3 November 2026

عندي ارق وبصعوبة دانام بحيث النهار كله مكضيته مثل السكران بسبب قله النوم

😢23🤣6😭3🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 21:37 UTC≈2,450 views46 reactions10 Starsread 3 November 2026

شهر جديد !

🤬21💘12👏4😢4🤣3🫡2

31 Oct 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,720 views88 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

اي والله شسويت بهاي السنة

😭67😢12🤣6😈2💘1

29 Oct 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,770 views100 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣80😭13🔥6👏1

Signed زينب

29 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,900 views74 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣61😭11😈2

28 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC≈3,210 views68 reactionsread 3 November 2026

يلحكني الحزن لو امشي 200

😭47😢11🤣7👏2🫡1

27 Oct 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,540 views82 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣64👏11😢7

23 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC≈4,140 views132 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭95🤣29😢8

Signed زينب

Showing the 12 most recent of 248 posts we hold for @memesxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 21 posts on @memesxx as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
6

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 11:20 UTCAnonymous Poll353 voters

اذا ادخل وياكم نقاش فلسفي علمي واهزمكم راح تبجون لو عدكم روح رياضة

  1. نبجي اكيد42%
  2. الروح الرياضية ترفرف62%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ممتتتتتتت
@batnashit0 · 67,997
#1
memes
@AliQusay0 · 7,320
#2
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 780,004
#3
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,472
#4
ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 92,432
#5
Memes Toxic
@bejdjskk · 7,880
#6
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer
@santer_sads · 360,106
#7
قهر 🏴 .
@assshkp · 2,851
#8
Omar Taste In Music
@omartasteinmusic · 1,867
#9
وزارة الترول العراقي
@troll_iqr · 1,980
#10
يوميات فتات جامعية مهرفلة
@tometo7777 · 11,047
#11
⁦numb
@numbhere · 4,225
#12
The sunny side 🌞
@thesunnyside4 · 9,865
#13
مُحَمَّد
@ajl1_1 · 17,520
#14
مَيخالِف
@makalef · 1,682
#15
جزيرة ابستين 🙊
@Impormems · 1,809
#16
سفر التكوين
@coolgenesis · 2,009
#17
ههه
@theonlyheaventho · 16
#18
CHAOS
@Chaosblock · 4,381
#19
البؤساء
@sad722 · 9,060
#20
ميمز حايرة والشوك بين عيونج
@onlymems1 · 1,197
#21
🆘
@BadIllusions · 1,177
#22
معاناة علاوي و اصحابه
@mrafq · 18,254
#23
ميمز وقذا 🪬
@memou_s · 13,461
#24
Vintage Yesur
@yforyelloww · 2,240
#25
Extra ميمز
@shwya_memess · 1,305
#26
رأي الناس
@RN24_IQ · 225,495
#27
وادي السلام
@azrabonaliraq · 1,980
#28
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية
@Newton1998 · 371,644
#29
شكو ماكو | أخبار
@koktelnews · 3,700
#30
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,203,345
#31
الجامعات الحكومية والأهلية
@Medical_cours1 · 751,201
#32
كسم.
@kasm_kiq · 5,163
#33
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,583
#34
مجرد قناة للصور
@chanelphotoo · 567
#35
Fact
@f0ctt · 31,141
#36
One Last Goodbye
@lastgoodbye1 · 21,244
#37
wezary by A.A
@wezaryataa · 58,601
#38
The Medical Family - العائلة الطبية
@MydoctorA96 · 189,534
#39
شبكة جامعيون
@collegeton · 233,537
#40
نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,730,802
#41
Sixth Dimension
@sixthdim · 4,014
#42
شبكة ملازمنا
@mlazemna · 1,086,875
#43
0/0
@error0error · 11,258
#44
امبراطورية الاخبار العراقية
@newss_iq · 82,334
#45
التعليم الناصي
@Educationiiq · 8,514
#46
البائسات
@ex8ea · 2,154
#47
بارت أُغنية 🎵
@partinmusic · 16,271
#48
ابن الدورة
@Edu211 · 666,530
#49

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 92,432
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,472
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 September 2026
ممتتتتتتت
@batnashit0 · 67,997
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
Trauma
@inTrauma · 27,391
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
𝟱𝟬𝟱
@xbk_0 · 20,523
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 23 September 2026
الاستاذ علي البدر
@mralithefullmoon · 56,385
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 23 August 2026
Repost
@viiiivil · 33,691
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
اندي
@anoudy9 · 31,251
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Fact
@f0ctt · 31,141
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
رأي الناس
@RN24_IQ · 225,495
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
cute/ugly 🥀
@ask_33s · 23,864
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 780,004
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
حُبًّا للقراءة
@freebooksf · 205,242
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
طلاب العراق - علي السورجي
@iraq_2016 · 59,330
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
عالم الكتب PDF
@Lovers_of_books · 179,244
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,583
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
The Medical Family - العائلة الطبية
@MydoctorA96 · 189,534
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
وكالة الرأي الدولية
@alraiiq · 44,590
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
Guardian Angels🕊
@thegurdianangel37 · 81,137
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
متكلمنيش
@fajer87 · 30,204
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
علي سعيد
@alisaedhsn · 23,391
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
التدحرج بالسادس
@Klawatx · 23,647
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
university of baghdad جامعة بغداد
@university_of_baghdad_photos · 163,631
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
شبكة متميزون التعليمية ✔
@M6NN6M · 37,213
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Memes” (@memesxx), 23,537 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memesxx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.