الإسلامية حضوريًا وية استاذ علي ما تحتاج دراسة بالبيت تفهمها، تحفظها، وتثبّتها بالكامل داخل المحاضرة. ✅
🍓11❤6😢2

Channel
@wezaryataa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,607subscribers
-4,268 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001571491595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wezaryataa |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wezaryataa |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 63,607 | -103 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 63,710 | -180 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 63,890 | -367 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 64,257 | -642 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 64,899 | -2,042 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 66,941 | -320 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 67,261 | -139 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 67,400 | -187 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:53 | 67,587 | -95 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:28 | 67,682 | -81 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 67,763 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 67,788 | +49 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 67,739 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 67,724 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 67,767 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 67,785 | -36 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 67,821 | +28 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 67,793 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 67,797 | +56 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 67,741 | first reading |
220 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 220 (5 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 977,000 |
| Reactions total | 9,826 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,600 reactions across 219 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,178 | 59.1% | |
| 💔 | 3,325 | 16.1% | |
| 😢 | 2,040 | 9.90% | |
| 🍓 | 1,465 | 7.11% | |
| 🙏 | 1,216 | 5.90% | |
| 🔥 | 376 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 219 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الإسلامية حضوريًا وية استاذ علي ما تحتاج دراسة بالبيت تفهمها، تحفظها، وتثبّتها بالكامل داخل المحاضرة. ✅
🍓11❤6😢2
📢 تنويه مهم | المجموعة الحضورية معهد أثر – زيونة نود إعلامكم بأن محاضرة يوم غد قد تم تأجيلها إلى الأسبوع القادم، لتكون: 📅 الأحد القادم 🕕 الساعة 6:00 مساءً 📍 معهد أثر – زيونة 🔸 لماذا تم التأجيل؟ سنستثمر هذا الأسبوع في ضبط أحكام التلاوة بصورة أكبر إلكترونيًا، حرصًا على الطلبة الذين لم يتمكنوا من حضور المحاضرة الحضورية الخاصة بالأحكام، حتى يصل الجميع إلى مستوى واحد قبل الانتقال إلى الموضوع القادم. 🔸 التسجيل مستمر خ…
❤17💔1
#عاجل ⚠️ التربية تتيح نقل الطلاب من مدرسة الى مدرسة اخرى او تسجيل الطلاب إلكترونياً عبر تطبيق سوبر كي شذ 🔵 وبسعر رمزي مقابل 2500 دينار دون الحاجة لمراجعة الدوائر الحكومية
❤129💔25😢10
بعد ما تكمل اجوبتك وتصفن وتسد الدفتر افتح الدفتر واصفن بكل سؤال شنو الي ممكن اخطأ بيه ك خطأ تافه هنا ؟ اصفن وفكر بكل سؤال راح تطلع كل الاخطاء التافهة الي ممكن توكع بيهة وهيج ممكن تتفادى هاي المشكلة كل التوفيق وخليها ببالك
❤217🙏19🔥16
لا تهمل رسم الدوال ، حتى لو اطلاع على الموضوع في حال اضطريت تجاوبه
🙏120❤82🍓22
اهم نقطة لا تنساها بامتحان الرياضيات رتب الحل يجوز ينطوك درجة كاملة عالترتيب فقط
❤215🙏31🍓30
لتنسى + c لتنسى ln مطلق المقام اذا المشتقة توفرت بالبسط مال المقام لتنسى الوحدات وديربالك اذا ما منطيك وحدة تكتب unit يعني وحدة لتنسى كل تربيع (قوة زوجية) ينطيك موجب سالب لتنسى الميل لازم لازم رقم لتنسى سالب اكس مشتقتة سالب واحد لتنسى الرسم بالتعريف مال القطوع لتنسى مجموعة الحل من يكلك حل لتنسى لتنسى الكليشة مال الفصل الخامس مال تمثل حلاً للمعادلة لتنسى Q.E.D يعني وهو المطلوب ولتنسى الطرف الايمن يساوي الايسر لتنسى من…
❤42🍓11🙏2
ملاحظات ذهبية للرياضيات بشكل عام
🍓24❤16
وبعد الاهمال بالثوابت ❗️ يا اما يحددنا بالسؤال ويكول القيمة تنتمي الى R الموجب ف نهمل السالب او ممكن يكول تنتمي الى R السالب بعدها مجاية بالوزاري بس ممكن يجيبها وفكرة حلوه why not ? ف انت كلش كلش تنتبه هو محددك بشنو وحسب شيحددك تهمل او ممكن بالسؤال ينطينا نوع النهاية ف راح نسوي اختبار للقيم يعني مثلاً السؤال نهاية عظمى ف نروح نسوي اختبار منو القيمة الي تنطي نهاية صغرى نهملها ومنو القيمة الي تنطينا نهاية عظمى ناخذه…
❤21🍓5
الفصل الاول : -بالجذور التربيعية من يفك مربع حدانية x+yi يخطأ بالاشارة مرات -بتبسيطات الi ميعرف شلون اذا اجاه بدون استخدام المرافق واكو عدد معين مثلا 200 وبالمقام 3-4i لازم ياخذ الفرق او يقسم مقامات والفرق هو يفتح قوس فوك 16+9 في 8 والناتج حيرجع 200 لان ٢٥*٨ هو 200 -بديموافر ميعرف اذا اجاه مثلا بس i اس ٥ شيسوي وكبل ينثول حبيبي كبل تفكه طريقة سريعة وهو كوساين باي على ثنين وساين باي على ثنين ونوب تخليلهم قوة ٥ وتلحم …
❤24🍓3
الفصل الثاني : القطع المكافئ اذا المعادلة والبؤرة نفس الاشارة فالدليل عكسهم متكدر تستنتج الاشارات مال المعادلة اذا بيهة مجهول بس اذا بيهة مجهول ومنطيك الدليل مثلا سالب ف اكيد هي موجب اذا كلك دليل القطع المكافئ يمر بهاي النقطة ف هاي النقطة تعوضها بالدليل ومستحيل تعوضها بالقطع لان هي مو من حقه اذا كلك قطع يمر بهاي النقطة ف هاي النقطة تعوضها بالقطع علمود تطلع قيمة p وترجع تعوضها وتطلع المعادلة القطع المكافئ اذا كلك ار…
❤20🍓3
بالقطع الناقص والزائد تعرفون معلوماتهن بس اكو فد شغلات الطالب ميعرف يستخرجهن مثلا الطول البؤري(focal length) هو 2c نصف القطر البؤري (focal radius)هو لو pf1 لو pf2 حسب الجهة مجموع بعدي اي نقطة عن البؤرتين هو 2a ليش ؟ لان pf1+pf2=2a - التعريف مال القطع الزائد والناقص بيه ٤ طرحات اشارة معادلة القطع الناقص موجبة واشارة معادلة القطع الزائد سالبة حلال المشاكل مال القطع الناقص اشارته سالبة حلال المشاكل مال القطع الزائد ا…
❤19🍓9🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @wezaryataa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
قَالَ الشَّاعِرُ: ما مَن أَحَبَّ رِضاكَ عَنكَ بِخارِجٍ حَتَّى تَقَطَّعَ نَفسُهُ حَسَراتِ. معمُولا "مَا":
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ويشكل الشحوم والسكريات نسبة السايتوبلازم في_
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ما موقع السايتوبلازم
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
يشكل الماء نسبة في السايتوبلازم___
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ويشكل البروتينات نسبة في السايتوبلازم_
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ينتج عن نشاط العضيات الخلوية ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 176 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“wezary by A.A” (@wezaryataa), 63,607 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wezaryataa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.