File, posted without a caption

Channel
يوسف الدراجي
@U_F_20
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,800subscribers
-980 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001360733360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @U_F_20 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/U_F_20 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 13,800 | -45 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 13,845 | -39 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 13,884 | -47 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 13,931 | -60 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 13,991 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 14,005 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 14,023 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 14,012 | +34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 13,978 | -62 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 14,040 | -68 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 14,108 | -62 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 14,170 | -74 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 14,244 | -47 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 14,291 | -37 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 14,328 | -19 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 14,347 | -77 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 14,424 | -88 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 14,512 | -93 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 14,605 | -68 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 14,673 | first reading |
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.2%
- avg views ÷ 13,800 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,970
- 126 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 128
- of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 145 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 247,687 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 96
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 33
- of 143 we hold a reading for · 23%
- Most on one post
- 17
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @U_F_20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 145 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🟡 رئيس السن للجنة التربية النيابية زليخة الياس : ننتظر رد مجلس الوزراء على توصيتنا بخصوص الدخول الشامل وإذا رفضت سنعتذر للطلبة. https://t.me/U_F_20
🔵 قناة الاحياء الخاصة أبوية : https://t.me/USOOF0
#هــــام 🔵 التعليم المهني يُعلن جدول امتحانات الدور (الخاص) للدراسة المهنية. https://t.me/U_F_20
😒
طبعًا وية هاي الدفعة للنهاية بإذن الله
هم ترشح للدخول الشامل
يمه واحد تلي
ع كولتك جماعه ATM ناموا زين
الحمدلله 😘🫶
🔺أسئلة اللغة الإنجليزية 🔺السادس الإعدادي - العلمي والأدبي 🔺الدور الثاني ٢٠٢٦ https://t.me/U_F_20
الأسئلة موحّدة ومشتركة بين العلمي والأدبي. وفّقكم الله جميعًا.
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @U_F_20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Gr_arab_lang000 · 41,403
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@v040v · 38,747
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@collegewez · 35,261
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
@wezaryataa · 67,261
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
@Hete14 · 71,264
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
@khudher_arabic · 75,496
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@AA_C62 · 88,293
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@Newton1998 · 394,469
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@xd6xd6 · 169,479
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@Esam_6 · 77,095
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
@Swads_6 · 108,153
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
@mo_ziyad99 · 34,059
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@al3rbuh · 51,643
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@Amar_fadll · 58,599
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@a_hamzaaljabri · 90,986
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
@santer_jamea · 220,825
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@alialhashimi511 · 96,466
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@suhaeb_aga · 58,501
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@collegeton · 233,406
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@santer_sads · 373,688
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@Gareeb9898 · 42,265
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
@almunqidh_lilsaadis · 73,888
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@mlazemna · 1,046,123
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@englishnofly · 89,137
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“يوسف الدراجي” (@U_F_20), 13,800 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/U_F_20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.