Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
17,300 average views per post against 27,438 subscribers — an engagement rate of 63.2%. Across the 5,410 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,607 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.69% and 14.0%, with a median of 7.10%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Posts measured
32 of 32 published in the window (0 exact, 32 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
555,100
Mature posts only
63.2% over 32 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net +270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,097–27,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 13:55
27,438
-4
26 Aug 2026, 12:33
27,442
+3
25 Aug 2026, 10:34
27,439
+62
24 Aug 2026, 12:16
27,377
-14
22 Aug 2026, 20:14
27,391
+18
21 Aug 2026, 13:39
27,373
+12
20 Aug 2026, 15:13
27,361
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:53
27,362
-21
18 Aug 2026, 10:43
27,383
+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:06
27,380
-23
16 Aug 2026, 03:17
27,403
-16
14 Aug 2026, 13:48
27,419
+152
13 Aug 2026, 06:05
27,267
-10
12 Aug 2026, 06:54
27,277
-7
11 Aug 2026, 07:34
27,284
+2
10 Aug 2026, 07:06
27,282
+140
9 Aug 2026, 07:11
27,142
-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
27,151
-17
6 Aug 2026, 21:15
27,168
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:04
27,168
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 27,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,500
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
32
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
49 (1 July 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
560,330
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
420
Videos
233
Links
59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
وقف الفلاحُ على حافة حقلِه؛ كانت الأرضُ من حوله متشققةً من الظمأ، تغصُّ بالغبار والجفاف. نظر إلى السماء الصافية التي لم تمنحْه غيمةً واحدةً منذ أشهر.
رفع يديه إلى السماء وبدأ يدعو الله بقلبٍ منكسر أن يرسل المطر. لكن، لم يكن مشهد دعائه عادياً.. ففي يده الأخرى، كان يمسك مظلةً سوداء مطوية.
مرَّ به عابر سبيل، ونظر إلى الأرض القاحلة، ثم إلى السماء الخالية، وأخيراً إلى المظلة، وقال ساخراً:
"يا هذا، أتستندُ إلى مظلةٍ في هجي…
بس الصدمة وين؟ الصدمة بالفئة الثانية، الأغلبية اللي تتهرب من المراية.
إذا چنت عايش يومك بـ عشوائية، وتأجل وتضيع وقتك وفلوسك على الشكليات، وتنام وتتكاسل، وبعدين توگع بالمصيبة وتبچي وتگول "الله جاي يختبرني".. فهذا مو ابتلاء، هذا غباء تنظيمي وتخلف عن قوانين الكون. عقلك الباطن من الداخل يرجف ويعرف إنك أنت الجاني وأنت الضحية، ولهذا تعيش بنكد وحسرة مستمرة لأنك جاي تكذب على نفسك. القرآن هنا يگولك بـ منتهى الصراحة «وما أصابك…
الجواب الحقيقي اللي تدور عليه هو مرآة تعكس مواجهتك ويا نفسك. كل اللي جاي تمر بيه بـ حياتك هسه، وبدون أي رتوش، ينقسم لـ حقيقتين ما تقبل التأويل:
إذا چنت إنسان محترف، رتبت حياتك، قريت، خططت، تعبت، وأخذت بكل أسباب الأرض وقوانينها، ومع ذلك انضربت بظرف دمرك.. فهنا أنت بـ منطقة "الابتلاء الإلهي". هذا مو عقاب، هذا نحت لـ روحك، وبناء لـ بصيرتك، الامتحان هنا جاي من برة حدود تغطيتك المادية، ولأنك بريء من التقصير، راح تلقى بـ گ…
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
عقارب الساعة تقترب من عتمة الليل، وأنا عالق في برزخ بين تعب يوم مضى وقلق غدٍ لم يأتِ بعد.
إشارة المرور الحمراء تجبرني على التوقف؛ لا بشر ألتمس في وجوههم الطمأنينة، ولا شاشة هاتف أهرب إليها خوفاً من قيد المخالفة.
في تلك العزلة الإجبارية، لم يتبقَ لي سوى السماء.
رفعت بصري نحو ذاك الرفيق الأزلي.. "القمر". بدا هادئاً كعادته، ثابتاً في مداراته منذ طفولتي وحتى شيب فكرتي. سألته في سري: "ما سرّ هذا الثبات؟ كيف لم تتأخر يوم…
Signed أ. علي الهاشمي 𖧾
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @infinity511. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 80,180 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الاستاذ علي الهاشمي 𖧾 @alialhashimi511 · 96,804 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
الاستاذ محمد الجنائي @suhaeb_aga · 59,787 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
احمد ابو السنتر | Al-Santer @Ahmed_Abo_ALSanter · 58,125 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
أَلا بِذِكرِ اللَّهِ تَطمَئِنُّ القُلوبُ @AlQuran_l · 45,223 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
مقالات أنسان مريض @iliiiii0 · 109,128 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
" سوادس قلبي " @Swads_6 · 109,055 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
برلين للتعليم @X4DDD · 215,496 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
سنتر الجامعة | Al-Santer @santer_jamea · 219,150 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
بالقـرأن نـرتـقـي @l11ll · 50,048 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
خضر الظاهر | اللغة العربية @khudher_arabic · 75,614 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية @Newton1998 · 395,623 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
المُصْحَف @lAlMosahfl · 772,598 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
شبكة جامعيون @collegeton · 233,735 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
شبكة متميزون التعليمية ✔ @M6NN6M · 57,974 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer @santer_sads · 372,486 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
سنتر الملازم | Al-Santer @santer_malazem · 66,550 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
الاستاذ سجاد العبيدي @sajjadobaidy · 215,665 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
احمد اللامي @eduuiq · 108,907 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
الأستاذ حسين محمد @teacher_mh · 273,856 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
الأستاذ حسن فلاح @hfbioo · 173,220 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
المنقذ في الأنكليزي || أ.محمد العبيدي @dr_English1 · 336,539 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ محمد قاسم @messo12 · 112,881 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
شكد باقي للوزاري؟ @kmbaki · 55,027 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
الاستاذ عمار فاضل @Amar_fadll · 59,956 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INFINITY 𖧾” (@infinity511), 27,438 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infinity511.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
