Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نَرجسة 𐙚 .

Channel

نَرجسة 𐙚 .

@N_Has2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,231subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001640946964
TypeChannel
Username@N_Has2
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/N_Has2

Growth

20,19120,28520,23811 August 2026 — 20,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,191 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,230 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,260 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,262 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,234 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,261 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,268 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,279 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,285 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,278 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,264 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,259 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,253 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,231 subscribers20,23111 August 202628 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 17 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,177–20,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 13:4620,231-22
27 Aug 2026, 13:4620,253-6
26 Aug 2026, 12:4220,259-5
25 Aug 2026, 10:2820,264-14
24 Aug 2026, 07:1620,278-7
22 Aug 2026, 11:4420,285+6
21 Aug 2026, 00:4420,279+11
19 Aug 2026, 22:5220,268+7
18 Aug 2026, 19:5620,261+27
17 Aug 2026, 18:3420,234-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:5720,235-27
15 Aug 2026, 01:0320,262+2
13 Aug 2026, 16:0720,260+30
12 Aug 2026, 13:2320,230+39
11 Aug 2026, 14:5320,191-7
11 Aug 2026, 12:3120,198first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.63%
avg views ÷ 20,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
734
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.683%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held44 (21 May 202628 August 2026)
Views total25,691
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,258 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529195966503324082879735.3%
🍓59926.5%
💘56324.9%
custom 53190693611666223751868.24%
1135.00%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,258reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 44 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @N_Has2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC926 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

دخلي وخمطي يلفاهية 🤣♥️

🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @N_Has2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 595,602 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مُلهَم
@TSsiS · 75,033
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
𝖢𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝖬𝖾🪞 .
@tillkv · 82,072
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
آذار
@nrrd3 · 64,955
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
طريقنا الى الجنة🤍
@jgjj2 · 44,485
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
رثاء الحُسين
@alruer · 67,995
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
ترتيب انستا هايلات بايوات افتارات
@NU_G5 · 132,639
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
شبكة بابليون
@babilcom · 137,596
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
عُزلة المُهتدين .
@zz_zzml · 87,389
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
احمد ابو السنتر | Al-Santer
@Ahmed_Abo_ALSanter · 58,367
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
مملكة عُـشتارات أسـاور 🐆♥️ .
@asawer_hussein22 · 129,002
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
زازا 💅🏻
@zhraalsalmi · 120,452
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
أيلول || Rehanat🌿
@aylol_w · 173,352
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
طريق الهُدىٰ
@MY_YiY · 55,194
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
سنتر الجامعة | Al-Santer
@santer_jamea · 219,220
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
مجرة دراستي ⚡️
@drsttr · 54,107
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
ִֶָ ⊹تباركي‧₊˚
@theonlyheaventho · 46,058
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 28 August 2026
شكد باقي للوزاري؟
@kmbaki · 54,870
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
صِدفة🤍.
@iisiis0 · 101,167
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
" سوادس قلبي "
@Swads_6 · 108,835
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
أَلا بِذِكرِ اللَّهِ تَطمَئِنُّ القُلوبُ
@AlQuran_l · 45,210
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
مقالات أنسان مريض
@iliiiii0 · 109,114
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
ابن كركوك
@GQ_38 · 297,307
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
اخبار وزارة التربيه | وزاره التعليم
@O2_E3 · 143,722
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
شبكة فلوجيين
@fallujeen1 · 79,363
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نَرجسة 𐙚 .” (@N_Has2), 20,231 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/N_Has2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.