
Channel
تَبارك الأعرجي
@t41116
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,315subscribers
+180 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001124097670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @t41116 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/t41116 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 6,315 | -31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 6,346 | -22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 6,368 | -26 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 6,394 | -16 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 6,410 | +55 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:22 | 6,355 | +4 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 6,351 | -41 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 6,392 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 6,390 | +12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 6,378 | +27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 6,351 | +40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 6,311 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 6,293 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 6,283 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 6,283 | +12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 6,271 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 6,255 | +48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 6,207 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 6,196 | +26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 6,170 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ll_inll · 18,810
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 October 2026
@N_Has2 · 20,057
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 September 2026
@AlQuran_l · 44,110
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
@TSsiS · 79,763
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@fatima_005 · 20,117
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
@wa2004jd · 23,471
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
@hamood692001 · 31,954
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
@IlAli9 · 22,552
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
@infinity511 · 27,634
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@tillkv · 82,736
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@meo_six · 29,098
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@B7UU7 · 232,850
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@suhaeb_aga · 53,603
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@strongzeno · 25,330
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
@lAlMosahfl · 777,846
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ahmed_Abo_ALSanter · 55,394
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
@drsttr · 73,926
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
@mimaox · 18,901
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 3 October 2026
@r54ou · 42,922
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
@n0n99n · 27,606
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
@apple_ee23 · 32,704
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@babilcom · 141,672
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@Qamarcat · 24,540
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
@NJOM_SDS · 25,285
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تَبارك الأعرجي” (@t41116), 6,315 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t41116.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.