كثيرُ سُهادِ العينِ مِن غِيرِ عِلَّةٍ ..

Channel
سـنـديـانـه ☀️
@universedcxuc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,829subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002033120893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @universedcxuc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/universedcxuc |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 9,829 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 9,842 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 9,853 | -29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 9,882 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:26 | 9,880 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 9,873 | +35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 9,838 | +14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 9,824 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 9,833 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 9,844 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 9,862 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 9,871 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 9,855 | +31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 9,824 | first reading |
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.84%
- avg views ÷ 9,829 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 279
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 121 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,624 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 32s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
الشجرة الاحبها سولفت سري .
-مساء الخير، نوافيكم علمًا؛ بأن الإنسان ممكن يحيّا بـ كلمة.
Photo, posted without a caption
"وافتح عليّ فتحاً يذهلني اتساعه وارضَ عني رضا لا اشقىٰ بعدهُ ابدا وامنن عليّ بِقُرةِ عينٍ غير منقطعة وبقلب سليم وكامل التسليم لكل اقدارك يا الله".
ربّنا آتنا ما نحبّ، علىٰ الوجه الذي تُحب ).
..❉.. أفعالنا و أقوالنا هي الريشه التي ترسمنا في قلوب الآخرين ، فلتڪن رسماتنا رقيقه جميله لا تُنسى. ╭┈─────── ೄྀ ࿐ ˊˎ-
و أهلُ الحبِّ أحياءُ ..🌿
"الذي يلفّ قلبه اليوم في قماشةٍ خوفًا من الضوء، أمسِ كان فاتحًا ذراعيه للشمس." - دينا إبراهيم
إمامنـا الصادق (؏ـليه السلام) يقول: " و إذا رأيتَ من هو أسفل منك بدرجة فارفعه إليك برفق ولا تحملن عليه ما لا يطيق فتكسره فإن من كسرَ مؤمناً فعليه جبره "
" عندما تخاطب احداً اقلُ منكَ علماً عليك ان تتحلى بأعلى درجات التواضع، وان يكون خطابك رؤوفاً غايتهُ الاحتواء ورفع مستوى المستمع، لا ان تنهرهُ فينفر منك أو تراهُ ناقصاً لانكَ افهم فهذا دليل على عدم استيعابك للمنظومة الأخلاقية "
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @universedcxuc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@zeinabkarout5 · 8,9753 postsحُب الحُسين يَجمعنا 💚
@Hob_alhussein22 · 23,7572 postsرحيق ميم (Maysaa)🤍🌸
@Rahik9 · 13,4992 postsThe Paradise 🪽
@pure214 · 7,0192 postsبَقيةُ الله .
@reem7y · 4,1602 postsلأنـكِ امرأة
@amli114 · 20,5991 postفِيــرُوزَة .
@fyruza97 · 7451 postصَبْرًا.
@olixvr · 1271 post𝑆𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑡💕
@s_sweet6 · 2,0991 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@pure214 · 7,0198 postsرائِحَة سَفَـرجَل♥!"
@Safarjali · 4,7025 postsلأنـكِ امرأة
@amli114 · 20,5994 postsبَقيةُ الله .
@reem7y · 4,1604 postsاِقتِبَاسَات مُلْهِمَة
@Ya_Zahraa_2020 · 34,8123 postsكِتَابَاتِي ..
@kitabate_2024 · 15,4463 postsدفء، زينب قاروط
@zeinabkarout5 · 8,9753 postsميمٌ ونَار!
@narandmem · 9662 postsدُرّة الجهاد 𓂆
@Dooraah · 5,2771 postكوزمتك رَوز💅🎀
@Rose2Rose0 · 2691 postأملي بالله وحده
@amelyblah · 23,1661 postفاطِمةالحُرالعامليّ
@fatima_alhor · 7,3681 postفُــرقَان ستور
@frqanstoor · 4,0601 postبَيت وَقَصِيدَة 🎧
@kacidaa_25 · 5,3671 postكهيعص.🌻
@mryamads · 6,5091 postروحٌ وريِحانّ 🌱
@ruhhwarayhan · 4,5321 postدِل عاشِق|..
@shalalsha · 3,1061 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@forqanwassam313 · 32,375
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@wa2004jd · 23,997
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
@e0lann · 48,578
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@Qotrss · 39,263
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
@OieeiO · 29,424
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
@iisiis0 · 98,894
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
@jgjj2 · 45,046
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@something9 · 34,665
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@n0n99n · 27,716
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
@fajer87 · 30,955
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
@IlAli9 · 23,180
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
@hs0000hs · 28,481
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
@tooma18aa · 66,134
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
@alimarer3 · 24,127
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
@book12_1 · 26,810
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سـنـديـانـه ☀️” (@universedcxuc), 9,829 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/universedcxuc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.