Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رائِحَة سَفَـرجَل♥!"

Channel

رائِحَة سَفَـرجَل♥!"

@Safarjali

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,761subscribers

+361 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487629258
TypeChannel
Username@Safarjali
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Safarjali

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,4004,7614,580.56 August 2026 — 4,400 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,420 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,519 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,567 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,586 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,611 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,644 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,649 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,657 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,711 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,718 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,735 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,716 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,702 subscribers29 September 2026 — 4,706 subscribers6 October 2026 — 4,721 subscribers13 October 2026 — 4,710 subscribers16 October 2026 — 4,701 subscribers19 October 2026 — 4,699 subscribers21 October 2026 — 4,701 subscribers25 October 2026 — 4,725 subscribers27 October 2026 — 4,732 subscribers30 October 2026 — 4,738 subscribers2 November 2026 — 4,761 subscribers6 August 20262 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net +361. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,346–4,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 13:184,761+23
30 Oct 2026, 05:274,738+6
27 Oct 2026, 16:064,732+7
25 Oct 2026, 01:394,725+24
21 Oct 2026, 22:374,701+2
19 Oct 2026, 00:044,699-2
16 Oct 2026, 03:164,701-9
13 Oct 2026, 01:454,710-11
6 Oct 2026, 20:004,721+15
29 Sept 2026, 15:574,706+4
19 Sept 2026, 05:194,702-14
14 Sept 2026, 11:394,716-19
10 Sept 2026, 11:384,735+17
5 Sept 2026, 03:174,718+7
1 Sept 2026, 13:384,711+54
29 Aug 2026, 15:424,657+8
26 Aug 2026, 14:224,649+5
23 Aug 2026, 07:444,644+33
20 Aug 2026, 05:034,611+25
17 Aug 2026, 11:484,586first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 36 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12856.1%
🕊177.46%
🥰167.02%
👏135.70%
🍓125.26%
💯93.95%
🤣73.07%
🔥52.19%
👌41.75%
😢41.75%
⚡31.32%
💔31.32%
👍20.877%
❤‍🔥10.439%
🏆10.439%
👎10.439%
💘10.439%
😍10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026

-⛅️مساء الخيـ͜ـࢪ والجو الحلو وجمال البدايات 🥺🤍. - لِـ مُحبي الصباحات المبهࢪة ⛅️🍁. -صور قَهوة ، حالات³⁰ث مسائية ، -إقتباسات مترجمة، اِنضمووا مش حتندمووا و🏃🏻‍♀🔥

11 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC243 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لكنَّها كلماتٌ مؤذيةٌ! لا أدري متىٰ يحينُ الأوانُ لأنْ أتجاوزَ هذه الأمورَ الصغائرَ، حتىٰ تزولَ عن قلبي، ولا يعودَ لها في نفسي أثرٌ، ولا تُحرِّكُ في كياني وَجْدًا، فأعيشُ بعدها طليقًا، كأنْ لم تكُنْ.

❤4

11 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC281 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

' لمَاذا يظلُّ في صدرِي شيءٌ عالقٌ، لا يبلغُ فمِي، ولا يجدُ سبيلًا إلىٰ الخروجِ؟ أظنُّه تلكَ الكلماتُ التي قيلتْ لي، وكانَ لي عندَها جوابٌ حاضرٌ، لكنِّي حبستُهُ إجلالًا، وإبقاءً على وِدادٍ كان، أو توهُّمًا أنَّ الصمتَ أبقىٰ للودِّ، وأنَّ الكلمةَ قد تهدمُ ما بناهُ السكوتُ !"

❤4🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

' « اسكِرْ روحَنا بِشرابِ لقائِكَ » . - شيرازي (حافظ) 🌿

❤4

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC245 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- #تساؤلات : لماذا المرء دائماً يقول أشياء أخرىٰ غير تلك التي رتبّها في صدره؟!"

❤3🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC375 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

احسن منهن اثنینهن💘

🤣7❤2🍓1👍1💘1

10 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC352 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- الرساله ؛ وكأسُ الشاي خمرُ العشقِ فينا وربّي لا أُقايضُهُ ببُنِّ

❤3🏆1👍1👎1

10 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC349 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- الرساله ؛ القهوة لأصحاب البصيرة والشاي لمن أضلّ الطريق🙂‍↔️

❤4

10 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

زمان عنكم رفاقي شلونكم؟ دزولنه صور شاي قهوة عصائر نحطها بالقنأ :) ❥ @Safrjll_bot

❤1🥰1

10 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC353 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

"ولتُدرك أنَّ القهوة ما هيَ إلا مشروب لا يُقدّم ولا يأخر، فـ مزاجُكَ الرائق، وسعة صدرك، وانشراحك، ما هوَ إلا نِتاجُ فِكرك ".

❤4

10 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC333 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تَخَيَّل فَقط كيف أَنَّ أَقْصَىٰ طُمُوحَاتِكَ أصبحت هيَ: أَنْ تَشْعُرَ بِقَلِيلٍ مِنَ الرَّاحَةِ، وَأَلَّا تَكُونَ مُنْزَعِجًا وَلَا مَكْرُوبًا؟!"

❤4💔1

9 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC477 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"في أوقات الحُزن، لا نحتاج إلىٰ نصائح، ولا إلىٰ إجابات منطقية، ولا إلىٰ عتاب، بل نبحث عن مواساة أو حِضن، وعن شخص يستمع إلينا، ولا يقلّل من حُزننا، ولا يتجاهله. ليس من الضروري أن يكون لديه الحلّ؛ يكفي أن يكون حضوره خفيفاً مريحاً، يُهوّن عليك، لا يضغط عليك، ولا يزيد الحُزن أكثر...".

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Safarjali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Safarjali as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الشِّعْرُ العَرَبيّ🖋
@mn_hord · 22,712
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
روحٌ مطمئنة ♡
@roohmotmaina · 43,204
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رائِحَة سَفَـرجَل♥!"” (@Safarjali), 4,761 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Safarjali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.