Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ههه

Channel

ههه

@theonlyheaventho

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

-20,402 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001767018942
TypeChannel
Username@theonlyheaventho
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/theonlyheaventho

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

146,05823,029.58 August 2026 — 20,418 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,418 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,607 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,714 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,677 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,684 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,649 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,384 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,471 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,181 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,927 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,546 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,335 subscribers23 August 2026 — 43,558 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,847 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,559 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,315 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,058 subscribers29 August 2026 — 45,614 subscribers30 August 2026 — 45,388 subscribers31 August 2026 — 45,047 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,822 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,622 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,324 subscribers5 September 2026 — 43,993 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,521 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,119 subscribers12 September 2026 — 42,923 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,739 subscribers16 September 2026 — 43,257 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2 subscribers2 October 2026 — 43,564 subscribers7 October 2026 — 44,241 subscribers12 October 2026 — 43,602 subscribers14 October 2026 — 43,364 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16 subscribers168 August 202628 October 2026
39 measurements spanning 82 days, net -20,402. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 20:1916+3
22 Oct 2026, 05:3613+12
15 Oct 2026, 07:491-43,363
14 Oct 2026, 04:0043,364-238
12 Oct 2026, 01:2043,602-639
7 Oct 2026, 11:0044,241+677
2 Oct 2026, 15:0043,564+43,562
18 Sept 2026, 10:192-43,255
16 Sept 2026, 05:3843,257+518
14 Sept 2026, 09:0142,739-184
12 Sept 2026, 20:2242,923-196
11 Sept 2026, 00:5843,119-402
8 Sept 2026, 03:4043,521-472
5 Sept 2026, 02:0043,993-331
3 Sept 2026, 10:0244,324-298
2 Sept 2026, 01:1744,622-200
1 Sept 2026, 00:1444,822-225
31 Aug 2026, 00:2745,047-341
30 Aug 2026, 01:3445,388-226
29 Aug 2026, 04:5745,614first reading

Engagement

429 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10531.1%
avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 429 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held429 (7 August 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total129,743
Reactions total4,502
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 14:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,402 reactions across 387 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,19021.8%
😭5,83020.5%
💋3,18911.2%
💘2,89410.2%
🍓2,5589.01%
❤‍🔥1,2524.41%
custom 53798739991551191759193.24%
💯8302.92%
💔6662.34%
custom 53350148911094979976392.25%
custom 52267915764952169625912.08%
😢3841.35%
custom 58458582153963820093261.15%
custom 52110916327823303202650.933%
custom 53821238576436004552630.926%
💅2600.915%
🤷‍♀1840.648%
🔥1670.588%
custom 54474495113518372471120.394%
🤝1090.384%
24 further kinds7742.73%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 389 of the 429 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,402 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 429 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
208
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 429 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theonlyheaventho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 429 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 14 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Oct 2026, 01:35 UTC≈1,130 views49 reactionsread 14 October 2026

طبيِنا الحَرب وَاحدنه يطوي الگاع وَمن شفناك وَاگف أيد مَا شلنه جَمعنا سيَوفنا وَردينه مَو من خوَف چي شفناك واگف بالحرب ضَدنا .

💘43❤4🍓2

Signed مُحَمد صَادِق

13 Oct 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,100 views40 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @m2bnmiPhoto

🎀🩷

💘30❤6❤‍🔥2🍓2

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,540 views40 reactionsread 14 October 2026

نورهاني اه بخت شفتيها صار سنه مشايفتها

❤34🍓6

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,530 views38 reactionsread 14 October 2026

- الرساله ؛ اليوم شفت نورهان وشايله ورد وطالع تشك شك من الجمال🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️🩵

💘25❤6🍓6💅1

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 20:13 UTC≈1,600 views34 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤23🍓5💋4🤩2

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,610 views47 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💘31😭5🍓4❤3💅2💋2

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,580 views48 reactionsread 14 October 2026

طبعا عيد ميلاد اختي نبا وطلعنا أكلنا مشويات وعيد ميلاد ايشا همين جبنه كيك وهوسه بس نسيت اصور

❤37🍓7👍2💋2

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,610 views41 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓38❤‍🔥2💘1

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,600 views60 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

شوكت تهتز الجيوب

😭50🍓7❤3

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,550 views42 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤33🍓6💘2❤‍🔥1

Signed TbarK

13 Oct 2026, 00:00 UTC≈2,400 views116 reactionsread 14 October 2026

صار بخاطري افهم ليش العالم تزيف حياتها بشكل زايد عن اللزوم

💅72🤷‍♀18🍓17❤6⚡2🤬1

Signed TbarK

Showing the 12 most recent of 429 posts we hold for @theonlyheaventho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@theonlyheaventho edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 27 posts on @theonlyheaventho as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

يوميات فتات جامعية مهرفلة
@tometo7777 · 11,047
#1
☀️🌊🌬️🪴
@luv634 · 16,820
#2
نبوىٰ
@mmmmmmmmmn19li · 7,588
#3
𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑠🪽
@angelleyees · 1,537 (as read 28 August 2026)
#4
هَدير
@Imhadeer · 13,007
#5
You can call me swan
@sobbyimnoni · 3,980 (as read 28 August 2026)
#6
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 780,442
#7
888
@PYPYl2 · 12,269
#8
بَلا ولا شيء
@JJ3DA · 21,543
#9
elsol
@i610e · 12,872
#10
513
@gravzs · 21,782
#11
𝗌𝗁𝖺𝗁𝖺𝖽 𝗁.
@llb0st · 4,341
#12
The sunny side 🌞
@thesunnyside4 · 9,916
#13
Star's girl
@squidwardFMi · 4,859
#14
حيادر
@llSPR · 20,055
#15
ㅤㅤㅤㅤحـسن
@ooooollllleeeeeeee · 7,426
#16
888
@marenoo22 · 5,831
#17
A Sky Full of Stars
@the_tabarak2 · 5,579
#18
مِش غّريَب
@ranyaq · 8,253
#19
₊⊹ browning 𝜗𝜚
@browningzai · 3,322
#20
watercolor eyes🦊
@gowanl · 1,874
#21
❣️
@viiiihl · 13,044
#22
كُشُك
@llofen9 · 4,773
#23
⋆⁺مِـيمة 🎀⊹˚
@mimaox · 19,114
#24
sunset
@amfa81 · 6,638
#25
Before we go
@moonembeer · 681
#26
m
@mohmmad773 · 523 (as read 28 August 2026)
#27
unreachable
@i611e · 13,734
#28
روما👷🏻‍♀️
@mayberomaa · 573
#29
Mood !
@xszszz · 11,860
#30
🦢
@swangirl6 · 10,753
#31
فـرقان - جانم فدای رَهبر
@forqanwassam313 · 30,637
#32
قناة مريم
@maryamsaad244 · 12
#33
One Last Goodbye
@lastgoodbye1 · 21,304
#34
Ro randoms ☀️
@itsmeRofairy · 663 (as read 28 August 2026)
#35
بِيسُو.
@israa_mz99 · 5,130
#36
شهد
@uirpli · 6,741
#37
نَرجسة 𐙚 .
@N_Has2 · 20,164
#38
شوية مني
@noorosi · 708
#39
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,201,066
#40
Doh
@ieeoq · 10,746
#41
نِبرَاس
@IlIlIlIlIlIlllllll · 1,177
#42
رأي الناس
@RN24_IQ · 225,364
#43
مُـدونه
@tabe77 · 5,685
#44
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer
@santer_sads · 359,581
#45

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ممتتتتتتت
@batnashit0 · 67,929
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
ميمز خاشوكة
@HHHB50H · 49,852
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 August 2026
فـرقان - جانم فدای رَهبر
@forqanwassam313 · 30,637
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
مقداد ابن السادس
@xccf_3 · 19,486
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 September 2026
Repost
@viiiivil · 33,733
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 92,529
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
تصريفات
@z12zxi · 225,581
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,725
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,453
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 September 2026
تَصويرنا 🦋.
@Qiise · 21,605
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 22 September 2026
نحاول :
@OieeiO · 31,899
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
Fact
@f0ctt · 31,129
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
𝙳𝚞𝚋𝚘𝚟
@Dubovdu · 31,866
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
⋆⁺مِـيمة 🎀⊹˚
@mimaox · 19,114
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 3 October 2026
Memes
@memesxx · 23,525
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 September 2026
وَجْد
@wa2004jd · 23,370
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
نَرجسة 𐙚 .
@N_Has2 · 20,164
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 September 2026
أَلا بِذِكرِ اللَّهِ تَطمَئِنُّ القُلوبُ
@AlQuran_l · 43,938
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
الاستاذ علي البدر
@mralithefullmoon · 56,066
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 23 August 2026
رولا
@Qamarcat · 24,321
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
مقالات أنسان مريض
@iliiiii0 · 107,980
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
بَلا ولا شيء
@JJ3DA · 21,543
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 September 2026
لو فيي خبّيك
@hajernazem90 · 19,772
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 October 2026
حَـــوراء🪞‏⋆˚
@hoari2004 · 24,350
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ههه” (@theonlyheaventho), 16 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theonlyheaventho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.