كليشه صورة عيد ميلادچ 🐾

Channel
صور كأنها الج 🦋.
@Lne_8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
136,814subscribers
-1,799 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001524831595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lne_8 |
| Description | ڪوني القوية وحَطمي الجَميع 🦋. لـ طلب التمويل : @NI999l . |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lne_8 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 136,814 | -114 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:45 | 136,928 | -41 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:39 | 136,969 | -86 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 137,055 | -118 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 137,173 | -56 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 137,229 | -92 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 137,321 | -167 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 137,488 | -142 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 137,630 | -102 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 137,732 | -172 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 137,904 | +64 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 137,840 | -172 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 138,012 | -57 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 138,069 | -54 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 138,123 | -99 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 138,222 | -137 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 138,359 | -187 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 138,546 | -165 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:02 | 138,711 | -61 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 138,772 | first reading |
Engagement
275 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 213 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.50%
- avg views ÷ 136,814 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,520
- 71 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 71
- of 275 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 275 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 534,020 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,780
- Videos
- ≈564
- Links
- ≈39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 40s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
استخارة مجانية مضبوطة 💯🕯️
Sticker, posted without a caption
صور اظافر كانها الـچ 💅🤍.
قناتي الثانية @z_reqa 🤎.
Sticker, posted without a caption
صور طلعات كانها الـچ 🤎.
قناتي الثانية @z_reqa 🤎.
Sticker, posted without a caption
- صور اجواء مطر كانها الج 🩷 ْ
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 275 posts we hold for @Lne_8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Lne_8 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 70 posts on @Lne_8 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 31 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 24
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@iT64i · 78,8569 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 115,9727 postsسورس بوتات ميوزك حياوي
@PPYPP · 170,1794 postsكِتمان اشعار افتار عبارات
@yypyy · 891,8374 postsشَوارع الآدب
@asxtye · 51,4513 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 116,0093 postsاشعار اغاني صور بنات خلفيات
@en_wk · 974,5303 postsمُمكن ألك
@ie12ee · 124,3813 postsغمچ گلبي
@lllxcrn · 45,5573 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 77,8793 postsرياكشنات🤎🇮🇶
@msra52 · 50,5013 postsكفخه إدراك:
@spwnrz · 61,1303 postsعالمي 🌍
@BZBBI · 40,0471 postمُختلفة .
@fg_bz · 68,1631 postمزج حنيتلك .
@I8ii9ii · 35,5141 postصور كانها لك 💙.
@IRT6I · 40,7791 postاقتباسات، حالات واتساب، خلفيات،عبارت حب،
@STORS5 · 278,2581 postترتيبات انستا 💙.
@trrteb · 63,9601 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@z_reqa · 14,43637 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 26,58714 posts• Girl mood ☀️.
@n0n99n · 27,52213 postsصور بنات كأنها الج 💜.
@bbv76 · 30,94910 postsبوت تحميل من جميع المواقع 📥
@VVXN_BOT · 12,8508 postsبوت تنزيل مقاطع انستا تيك توك
@QWGHUHVBOt · 17,3787 postsمـَكْتَبَة بُــن || Bon Library
@Bon_Library · 11,1645 postsحَـــوراء🪞⋆˚
@hoari2004 · 24,4675 posts- لمة بنات☀️.
@INTJ_CYS · 3,2175 posts🦢
@laivl · 36,8165 postsڪلايش سمسم
@z_484 · 7,7255 postsتَصويرنا 🦋.
@Qiise · 21,6414 postsوقت الأسترخاء
@vvv_8vv30 · 1,3044 postsبيت النساء 💒
@rroxba · 8,0183 postsعُزلة المُهتدين .
@zz_zzml · 82,3523 postsملجئي 🤍.
@HJ_YB · 18,9062 posts♡ تراث استايل ♡
@hufnnwj · 1,7172 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@QCQ37 · 75,5952 postsأنوار القرآن .
@ssdfgtry · 36,5172 posts• سـالـفـة وگـمـرة •
@x_603 · 21,8542 postsلـِ َزهـرَة ☾"
@zz_ry4 · 10,3052 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,2471 postايومي ستور | Store𝜗𝜚
@ir7lg · 2,0521 postتمويلاتي 🩶.
@NI999l · 2981 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Lne_8 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026 · confirmed gone 5 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 3 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ooaooos · 232,671#1
@NNNN0I · 11,294#2
@HiEiND · 70,447#3
@ZZ_VVi · 14,176#4
@fg_bz · 68,163#5
@vc6Il · 139,329#6
@nscsz · 80,806#7
@lRlTI · 76,179#8
@IRT6I · 40,779#9
@trrteb · 63,960#10
@AE_Hl · 109,869#11
@zzzzzz · 2,002,706#12
@IIU4T · 73,378#13
@trteb9 · 78,164#14
@NO_6C · 31,958#15
@afQ55 · 124,906#16
@myiyia · 190,615#17
@rsr2z · 44,625#18
@Diilen · 116,009#19
@ssswvs · 18,705#20
@en3_g · 369,766#21
@vvpvvv1 · 100,696#22
@Qiise · 21,641#23
@SS2lS · 181,432#24
@kooora_land · 23,354 (as read 13 August 2026)#25
@vnvvcs · 20,519#26
@zt_tz2 · 29,012#27
@t88q1 · 39,177#28
@fsbdys · 25,876#29
@llllahll · 124,565#30
@PPPPJ · 2,319,653#31
@c7_77c · 52,197#32
@Geoooom · 68,739#33
@NxNkwk · 3,079#34
@nrrd1 · 37,763#35
@SlSl2l · 121,145#36
@asxtye · 51,451#37
@ERT8l · 129,067#38
@cckkxs · 15,365#39
@Kd_kla1 · 42,894#40
@Nh_NE · 83,023#41
@spwnrz · 61,130#42
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,457#43
@iraqed4 · 3,203,345#44
@yatmanqalbi · 101,804#45
@c8orl · 1#46
@FCB_V · 89,350#47
@PPPJP · 3,187,255#48
@nrrd3 · 61,758#49
@UIOIU0 · 103,064#50
@citystop2 · 25,842#51
@PVVVV · 805,798#52
@zrzzzz · 1,396,272#53
@OOIIIEEE · 56,065#54
@m3im3ii · 114,262#55
@cf67c · 44,611#56
@iraqedu · 4,730,802#57
@lBIBPl · 34,257#58
@kkkkkkkhvc · 16,336#59
@T_16_7 · 47,872#60
@povv4 · 126,759#61
@FN_73 · 149,229#62
@ANNI1l · 28,074#63
@M1140 · 106,139#64
@sdqgii · 29,887#65
@HH_H7S · 264,450#66
@MemesRaqen · 26,260#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ll3llI · 36,975
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
@trrteb · 63,960
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@fg_bz · 68,163
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@ss_horror · 202,013
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@ooaooos · 232,671
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@trteb9 · 78,164
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@xo_bs · 165,506
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@adniat54 · 40,385
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@nscsz · 80,806
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@HiEiND · 70,447
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@ssswvs · 18,705
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 3 October 2026
@c7_77c · 52,197
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
@fsbdys · 25,876
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 11 September 2026
@Z5_38 · 21,247
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 22 September 2026
@SS2lS · 181,432
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@DleelD · 19,827
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
@AE_Hl · 109,869
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@kwknss · 79,678
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
@lighimazih · 84,572
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@Uuu2X · 169,465
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@nasme_t · 207,913
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@W_H_5 · 26,794
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
@Mlath82 · 29,212
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
@iq1_iq · 300,373
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 106 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صور كأنها الج 🦋.” (@Lne_8), 136,814 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lne_8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.